Author Name
Admin_niti
Choose Report Type
Publication Date
Report Upload
Download
(20.03 MB)
vertical
Energy
PDF Text
Designed b y
STATE
ROUND-I
ENERGY &
CLIMATE INDEXSTATE ENERGY & CLIMATE INDEX
ROUND-I
April 2022 State Energy and Climate Index: Round-I
Publishing Agency: NITI Aayog
Year of Publication: 2022
Language: English
ISBN: 978-81-953811-9-7
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/8ec6q
Authors: Sweety Pandey; Navin Kumar Vidyarthi;
Rajnath Ram and Rakesh Sarwal STATE ENERGY
& CLIMATE INDEX
ROUND-I
(Based on 2019-20 data)
April 2022 iiState Energy & Climate Index Round-I
AUTHORS & ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Authors
Dr. Sweety Pandey, Young Professional, NITI Aayog
Shri Navin Kumar Vidyarthi, Director, NITI Aayog
Shri Rajnath Ram, Adviser, NITI Aayog
Dr. Rakesh Sarwal, Additional Secretary, NITI Aayog
Peer-reviewer
Prof. Rangan Banerjee, Department of Energy Science and Engineering, IIT Bombay
(now with IIT Delhi)
Acknowledgements
The team is grateful for the mentorship and inputs provided by:
Dr. Rajiv Kumar, Vice-Chairman, NITI Aayog
Dr. V. K. Saraswat, Member, NITI Aayog
Shri. Amitabh Kant, CEO, NITI Aayog
The team is grateful for the input and contributions received from the following ministries:
Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change (MoEFCC)
Ministry of Power (MoP)
Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas (MoPNG)
Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE)
Central Electricity Authority (CEA)
Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE)
Power Finance Corporation (PFC)
Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board (PNGRB)
We would also like to thank the following organisations who provided valuable inputs that shaped
the contour of the report:
IIT Kanpur
Alliance for an Energy Efficient Economy (AEEE)
The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI)
Council on Energy, Environment and Water (CEEW)
Integrated Research and Action for Development (IRADe)
Prayas (Energy Group)
International Energy Agency (IEA)
The World Bank
The report has benefited a lot from continuous inputs from Shri Ashok Rajput, CEA; Shri Karthik Ganesan,
CEEW; Shri Manoj Kumar Upadhyay, Deputy Adviser, NITI Aayog; Shri Kamil Bhullar, Research Officer,
NITI Aayog; Shri Prasanth Regy, Ms. Prachi Gupta, and all other members of Energy team of NITI Aayog.
We are also thankful to Ms. Saloni Sachdeva (NITI Aayog) for editing the manuscript.
Disclaimer
This report is based on secondary data sources and information received from ministries. NITI Aayog
does not guarantee the accuracy of the data or accept the responsibility for the consequences of using
this data, as this index is based purely on information received from secondary sources. iiiState Energy & Climate Index Round-I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Abbreviationsv
Foreword by Vice Chairman, NITI Aayogix
Message by Member (Energy), NITI Aayogxi
Foreword by CEO, NITI Aayogxiii
Executive Summaryxv
1 Background. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1
2 Review of the Global and National Indices. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3 State Energy & Climate Index (SECI). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15
4 Methodology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .23
5 Key Findings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
6 Learnings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
7 The Way Forward. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
8 Annexures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .51
Annexure 1: State-wise performance across indicators52
Annexure 2: Indicator-wise performance of all states87
Annexure 3: SECI-Round I: Indicator’s definition, weights, data source
and a list of progressive and regressive indicators93
Annexure 4: States with null values across indicators104
Annexure 5: Correlation matrix of indicators105
Annexure 6: Raw data of each state for all indicators106 vState Energy & Climate Index Round-I
A&NAndaman & Nicobar
ACSAverage Cost of Supply
AEEEAlliance for an Energy Efficient Economy
AMIAdvanced Metering Infrastructure
ARRAverage Revenue Realised
AT&CAggregate Technical and Commercial
BEEBureau of Energy Efficiency
CCPIClimate Change Performance Index
CEACentral Electricity Authority
CEEWCouncil on Energy, Environment and Water
CEIClean Energy Initiatives
CERCCentral Electricity Regulatory Commission
CH4Methane
CNGCompressed Natural Gas
CO2Carbon Dioxide
CO2eq Carbon Dioxide Equivalent
COPConference of the Parties
CPPCritical Peak Pricing
D&DDaman & Diu
D&NDadra & Nagar Haveli
DBTDirect Benefit Transfer
DDUGJY Deendayal Upadhyaya Gram Jyoti Yojana
DISCOM Distribution Company
DSMDemand Side Management
EAPIEnergy Architecture Performance Index
EC Act Energy Conservation Act
ECBCEnergy Conservation Building Code
EE Energy Efficiency
ABBREVIATIONS Abbreviations
viState Energy & Climate Index Round-I
EESLEnergy Efficiency Services Limited
ES Environmental Sustainability
ESGEnvironmental Social and Governance
ETIEnergy Transition Index
EUEuropean Union
EVElectric Vehicle
EYErnst & Young
FAMEFaster Adoption and Manufacturing of (Hybrid &) Electric Vehicles
FYFinancial Year
GDPGross Domestic Product
GHGGreenhouse Gas
GoIGovernment of India
GSDPGross State Domestic Product
HDIHuman Development Index
HEVHybrid Electric Vehicle
HLPFHigh Level Political Forum
HSDHigh Speed Diesel
ICAPIndia Cooling Action Plan
IEAInternational Energy Agency
IPDSIntegrated Power Development Scheme
IRESIndian Residential Energy Survey
ISFRIndia State of Forest Report
J&KJammu & Kashmir
KPIKey Performance Indicator
LPGLiquefied Petroleum Gas
LULUCF Land use, Land-use Change and Forestry
MNREMinistry of New & Renewable Energy
MoEFCC Ministry of Environment Forest and Climate Change
MoPMinistry of Power
MoPNG Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas
MoRTH Ministry of Road Transport & Highways
MoUMemorandum of Understanding
N2ONitrous Oxide
NDCNationally Determined Contribution
NHEMNational Hydrogen Energy Mission
NI New Initiatives
NITI National Institution for Transforming India Abbreviations
viiState Energy & Climate Index Round-I
NMEEE National Mission for Enhanced Energy Efficiency
OAOpen Access
PAHAL Pratyaksh Hanstantrit Labh
PATPerform Achieve and Trade
PFCPower Finance Corporation Ltd.
PM-KUSUM Pradhan Mantri Kisan Urja Suraksha evam Utthaan Mahabhiyan
PMUYPradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana
PNGRB Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board
PPAPower Purchase Agreement
PPACPetroleum Planning & Analysis Cell
RBIReserve Bank of India
RE Renewable Energy
RECAI Renewable Energy Country Attractiveness Index
RTPReal Time Pricing
SAIDI System Average Interruption Duration Index
SAIFI System Average Interruption Frequency Index
SDGSustainable Development Goal
SECIState Energy and Climate Index
SEEIState Energy Efficiency Index
SERCState Electricity Regulatory Commission
SMESmall and Medium Enterprises
SMNPSmart Meter National Programme
T&DTransmission & Distribution
TFCTotal Forest Cover
TFECTotal Final Energy Consumption
TGATotal Geographical Area
ToDTime of Day
ToUTime of Use
TPESTotal Primary Energy Supply
UDAYUjwal DISCOM Assurance Yojana
UJALA Unnat Jyoti by Affordable LEDs for All
UT/UTs Union Territory/ Union Territories
VNRVoluntary National Review
WECWorld Energy Council
WEFWorld Economic Forum
WETIWorld Energy Trilemma Index m.ctt.m. {t1-<{<:H1
Dr. V.K. Saraswat
�
� �
�� .�,wt
-;:,{ �-110001
Government of India
Member
Tele : 23096566, 23096567
Fax : 23096603
National Institution for Transforming India
NIT! Aayog, Parliament Street,
New Delhi -110 001
E-mail : vk.saraswat@gov.in
MESSAGE
India is a country filled with natural resources. For instance, India accounts
for almost ten percent of the world's coal reserves and it has the largest thorium
reserves. But unfortunately, India imports almost 150 billion dollars worth of
of energy every year and this number is likely to double in the next 15
years unless corrective action is taken. So, there is a need to secure India's
energy future via effective centre's policies, the development of indigenous
technologies, and impeccable implementation. While there is a lot of focus
and research on the centre's role in delivering a secure and sustainable energy
economy, the role of states has largely been not discussed. The State Energy &
Climate Index-
Round I is envisaged as a stepping stone in highlighting the role and
performance of the state in the energy sector. It will help the country to become
"Atmanirbhar in the energy sector" by encouraging healthy competition
among states on different dimensions of the energy and climate sector.
After extensive discussion
with the stakeholders, several key parameters
have been identified to track and rank the state performance in the energy sector.
Amongst these parameters, only the parameters whose data is reliably available
have been taken in for this edition of the report. The exercise reveals that some of
the important data is not available at the state level. Going forward, there is a need
to develop a robust mechanism to capture data in this sector. I would like to
encou rage states to work with NITI Aayog in enabling a robust exchange of data to
further evolve and refine the index in the subsequent edition.
Overall, the State Energy & Climate Index-
Round I is based on 27
Key Performance Indicators (KPis) covering 6 parameters 'DISCOM's
performance' 'access, affordability & reliability of energy', 'clean energy
initiatives', 'energy efficiency', 'environmental sustainability, and 'New initiatives.
I strongly believe that indigenous technology development to leverage
resources available in the country and converting these resources into green fuels
that can power the economy is paramount for securing India's energy future. To
deliver on this ambition the role of states is critical as each
state has a different
portfolio of natural resources and state authorities would be in the best position to
enable the best creation of value from these energy resources. This will
require effective coordination and synergy with central programs and
also pro-active communication with the people of the states. I encourage all the
states to leverage the report and engage in peer-to-peer learning to radically
improve the energy ecosystem in the state which will be automatically reflected in
the rankings.
New Delhi
23.02.2022 Foreword
AttheCOP-26conference,theHonourablePrimeMinisterofIndiapresentedthe
agendaforthecountrytocombatclimatechange.Heannouncedthatby2030,the
countrywouldstriveto achieve 500 GW of installed electricity capacity from non-fossil
fuel sources, reduce thetotalprojectedcarbonemissionbyadditionalonebillion
tonnes, reducethe carbon intensityoftheeconomy by lessthan45%
andlastly,the country would achieve net-zero emissions by 2070.
The central government has taken major steps to reform the energy sector and usher in
a climate-friendly energy transition that will deliver energy security, affordability, and
sustainability. The steps include proposing the Electricity (Amendment) Bill, 2020, PM-
KUSUM scheme, proposing amendments to Energy Conservation Act (2001), Production-
linked incentive schemes, Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana, and so on.
While all these initiatives are aimed at transforming the Indian energy sector, states
will have to play a critical role in this historic transformation. Therefore, to deliver
one of its mandates of promoting cooperative federalism, NITI Aayog started to
work on a world-class State Energy & Climate Index (SECI). NITI Aayog has
undertaken extensive research and went through a consultative process to
construct a fair, transparent, and progressive index. While there is a lot of room for
improvement and refinement but thisedition of SECI will function as a starting
point for an effective benchmarking of state'sperformances in the energy sector for
the benefit of the Indian citizens, policy analysts, and investors. This would
encourage the state’s initiatives towards green economy and attract investments in the
renewable sector.
I congratulate the top States&UnionTerritoriesfor their exemplary performancein
thestatesandIamconfidentthatotherstateswillleverage this indextobridge the gapwith
theirbestcounterpartsacross categories.
(Amitabh Kant)
Place-New Delhi
Dated- 07/03/2022 xvState Energy & Climate Index Round-I
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
India is a resource-rich and diverse country. Many of its states are comparable to countries
in the European Union in terms of area, population, and diversity of resources. Thus, a
one-size-fits-all approach will not be appropriate as each state and Union Territory (UT)
differ in terms of culture, geography, and use of energy resources. It is imperative for each
state and UT to have its own policy to harness its potential and capability.
Apart from policy formulation, it is also important to track the progress of the implementation
of these policies. The State Energy and Climate Index (SECI) is the first index that aims
to track the efforts made by states and UTs in the climate and energy sector. It is hoped
that an in-depth analysis of individual states will help in enhancing the service delivery
on various parameters of energy. These parameters have been devised keeping in mind
India’s goals for climate change and clean energy transition.
The report consists of three thematic parts. The first part (chapters 1–3) explains the
background, objective and present energy scenario in India. Different global and national
indices are described, as well as a comparison of the Indian economy with a few other
countries is done to give an insight into how these economies perform in the energy and
climate sectors. A review of all existing indices reveals that there is no comprehensive
index to evaluate the performance of the states in the energy sector. A comprehensive
State Energy & Climate Index should ideally cover affordability, accessibility, efficiency,
DISCOM’s performance and climate friendliness of all forms of energy. This formed the
motivation for formulating the State Energy & Climate Index. This index is envisaged to
be at par with the international indices covering the entire energy value-chain.
The second part (chapters 4-5) lays out the explanation of parameters and indicators used
in the study, the methodology used to construct the index, followed by key findings at
the state level and further analysis of each parameter. The index consists of 6 parameters
namely, DISCOM’s Performance; Access, Affordability and Reliability; Clean Energy Initiatives;
Energy Efficiency; Environmental Sustainability; and New Initiatives. The parameters are
further divided into 27 indicators. Based on the composite SECI score, the states and UTs
are categorized into three groups: Front Runners, Achievers, and Aspirants. Executive Summary
xviState Energy & Climate Index Round-I
The scores and ranks are presented as per larger states, smaller states, and UTs. Gujarat,
Kerala and Punjab are the top three performers among larger states. Goa has emerged as
the top-performing state in the ‘Smaller States’ category, followed by Tripura and Manipur.
And lastly, among UTs, Chandigarh, Delhi, and D&D/D&N are performing well.
The third and final part (Chapter 6-7) provides learnings and the way forward in the
form of recommendations for policymakers with national and state governments. Several
learnings emerged during the preparation of the report and it is hoped that the learnings
will help policymakers to improve performance in the energy sector. Annexure 1 provides
a comprehensive snapshot of state-wise profile of scores achieved under each parameter
and indicator. Additional annexure provides information on indicator-wise scores of states.
Additional annexures provide detailed information related to indicators definition, weights,
null values, state-wise raw data etc. 1
BACKGROUND Background
2State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
INTRODUCTION
India, the third-largest energy consumer and the third-largest oil importer is working
aggressively to provide affordable energy, ensuring energy access to all and ensuring
high efficiencies in the operations. The intent to provide energy security to its 1.3 billion
people will have far-reaching impact on India’s energy portfolio as its embraces clean
energy pathways. India has strengthened its position in the market not only as a popular
consumer but also as a transforming nation with some outstanding far-reaching agendas
like increasing non-fossil fuel based installed electricity capacity of the country by 2030
to 500 GW, reducing the emission intensity of its GDP by about 45 percent from 2005
levels by 2030. India has a flourishing diversity with 28 states and 8 Union territories
that cover a range of geographical complexities. The per capita energy consumption of
India is one-third of the world average. More efforts are required to raise this per capita
energy consumption for the inclusive development of the country. However, it will not
be pragmatic to apply the same policy in every state and cascade the same agenda of
energy transformation across various states. It requires in-depth analysis and strategic
decision-making to come up with an appropriate energy transformation strategy for each
state depending on the geographical complexities of the state.
The energy sector contributes to about 75% of the total greenhouse gas emissions of
the country. The paradigm shift in the clean energy transition has a twin-fold objective: i)
ensure affordable and reliable energy to all and ii) reduce its dependence on fossil-based
energy by accelerating the clean energy transition. Though the government has made
significant reforms in the energy sector, a lot needs to be done to achieve these objectives.
This requires a robust roadmap and active involvement of the states.
The government has given thrust to improve downstream delivery with an aim to improve
transmission, distribution infrastructure and financial position of distribution companies;
access to clean cooking fuel through efficient and affordable fuel and ensure 24*7 supply
of electricity. All these efforts require differential planning and execution. Under cooperative
and competitive federalism, ranking the state’s initiatives can play an important role to
improve performance. Rankings will be useful for policy-makers and the state authorities
in identifying the leaders and the laggards in the energy sector and finetune the policies
by benchmarking against the best.
Taking a cue from experts and partner institutions, NITI Aayog has developed the State
Energy & Climate Index (SECI) which measures the state’s efforts for improving the energy
sector. The index has been designed to assess and identify the scope for improving the
performance of states and to help them efficiently manage their energy resources. This
will provide the states and concerned central ministries/departments with a ready reckoner
of valuable information which in turn would empower them to formulate and implement
suitable policies. The index has a preliminary set of 27 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
covering 6 parameters ‘DISCOM’s performance’, ‘access, affordability & reliability of energy’,
‘clean energy initiatives’, ‘energy efficiency’, ‘environmental sustainability’ and ‘new initiatives’. Background
3State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
Objectives
The objectives of the index are:
Ranking the States based on their efforts towards improving energy access,
energy consumption, energy efficiency, and safeguarding environment;
Helping drive the agenda of affordable, accessible, efficient and clean energy
transition at the State level;
Encouraging healthy competition among the states on different dimensions of
energy and climate.
Since DISCOMS are the important link in the entire energy value chain, their performance
has been assigned with higher weightage (40%) in the overall index. The aspects of financial
viability and performance of DISCOMS have been taken into consideration to encourage
competition among states. Other parameters such as ‘access, affordability & reliability
of energy’, ‘clean energy initiatives’, ‘energy efficiency’, ‘environmental sustainability’ and
‘new initiatives’ have been assigned weights of 15%, 15%, 6%, 12% and 12% respectively.
The State Energy & Climate Index will track the performance of the states in the energy
and climate sector. The findings will help the states to take timely remedial measures for
better management, thereby, meeting expectations of the citizens. The overall objective
of the index is to develop healthy competition among the states to perform better and
provide quality energy services to users in their states. 2
REVIEW OF
THE GLOBAL &
NATIONAL INDICES Review of the Global & National Indices
6State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
2.1. GLOBAL INDICES
A. World Energy Trilemma Index (WETI)
Since 2010, the World Energy Council has been preparing the World Energy Trilemma
Index
1
which annually measures the energy system performances of 127 countries across
the following dimensions:
Energy Security: This measures the capacity of nations to provide a sufficient
and reliable supply of energy to meet their current and future energy demand.
Energy Equity: This measures each nation’s ability to ensure universal accessibility,
affordability and reliability of energy for domestic as well as commercial use.
Environmental Sustainability: This captures indicators that measure the efficiency
of the nation’s energy system to mitigate and avoid potential harm to the
environment and climate change impact.
Country Context Dimension: This captures elements such as macroeconomics,
governance and institutional conditions that enable economies to develop and
implement their energy policy effectively.
The overall Index ranking of each country is calculated based on 32 indicators, falling under
11 categories across the above-mentioned dimensions. Energy Security, Energy Equity
and Environmental Sustainability are given equal weightage of 30 percent each and the
Country Context dimension has 10 percent weightage. As per the WETI-2021 report, just
9 out of 127 countries performed well, across all three energy trilemma dimensions and
achieved AAA grades.
Trilemma Rank
# 75
Trilemma Score
53.1
Balance Grade
B D D
61.2/100
ENERGY
SECURITY
ENERGY
EQUITY
47.1/100
ENVIRONMENTAL
SUSTAINABILITY
50/100
Fig 2.1: India’s Position (Trilemma Rank, score and balance)
Source: World Energy Trilemma Index, 2021
1 World Energy Trilemma Index, 2021. https://www.worldenergy.org/publications/entry/world-energy-trilemma-
index-2021 Review of the Global & National Indices
7State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
2000
Declined Baseline Improved
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Energy Security Energy Equity Environmental Sustainability
Fig 2.2: Historical Trilemma trend lines tracking India’s performance in each dimension
Source: World Energy Trilemma Index, 2021
India’s Position
As shown in Fig. 2.1, India is ranked 75
th
in the World Energy Trilemma Index (WETI) 2021.
The overall trilemma score is 53.1 and the scores of energy security, energy equity and
environmental sustainability are 61.2, 47.1 and 50 respectively. Trend lines in Fig 2.2 indicate
that since 2000, India has been continuously striving to achieve energy equity by having
better electricity accessibility and clean cooking facilities. However, the scores are low for
sustainability and energy security, with little improvement.
B. World Energy Transition Index
The Energy Transition Index (ETI)
2
is one of the initiatives taken by the World Economic
Forum (WEF) to track global energy transition. The index disseminates information on the
nation’s energy systems and promotes the adoption of policies, decisions and collaboration
to secure affordable, sustainable and inclusive energy systems in the future. The ETI 2021 is
a continuation of the Energy Architecture Performance Index (EAPI) published by (WEF)
from 2013 to 2017.
The ETI framework has two parts: System Performance and Energy Transition. The current
energy system performance assesses the nation’s energy system based on three key
parameters: i) the ability to support economic growth and development, ii) universal access
to a secure and reliable energy supply and iii) environmental sustainability across the energy
value chain. Further, the energy transition includes indicators related to political commitment,
regulatory structure, consumer awareness, incentives to promote investments and innovation,
stable business environment, adoption of new technologies and other factors.
2 Fostering Effective Energy Transition 2021 edition, World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/
reports/fostering-effective-energy-transition-2021#:~:text=As%20countries%20continue%20their%20
progress,Effective%20Energy%20Transition%202021%20report. Review of the Global & National Indices
8State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
The ETI is a composite score of 40 indicators and is calculated for 115 countries that
constitute 93% of the world’s total energy supply. The composite ETI score is calculated
as the average of the System Performance Index and Transition Readiness Index. ETI 2021
scores also provide an insight into how the global energy transition has evolved since 2015.
India’s position
As shown in Fig. 2.3, the overall ETI score of India is 52.8 with system performance score
and transition readiness score being 58.2 and 47.3 respectively. Sweden leads the list of
115 countries and India ranks at 87th position among 115 countries in the ETI. India (87),
has made strong improvements over the past decade, despite coal continuing to play a
significant role in its energy mix.
47.358.252.8
Energy Transition IndexSystem Performance Transition Readiness
Fig 2.3: ETI Scorecard, India 2021
Source: Fostering Effective Energy Transition 2021 edition, World Economic Forum
Energy Transition Index
System Performance
Economic Growth & Development
Energy Access & Security
Environmental Sustainability
Transition Readiness
Capital & Investment
Energy System Structure
Human Capital & Consumer Participation
Infrastructure & Innovative
Business Environment
Institutions & Governance
Regulation & Political Commitment
52.76
58.18
53.29
76.11
45.13
47.34
51.84
29.23
27.67
53.94
45.40
75.97
Fig 2.4: India’s ETI, Sub-indices and Dimension scores (vs. World Average)
Source: Fostering Effective Energy Transition 2021 edition, World Economic Forum Review of the Global & National Indices
9State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
Other countries in the top 5 are Norway (2nd), Denmark (3rd), Switzerland (4) and Austria
(5). Fig. 2.4 compares India’s ETI score, its sub-indices and dimension scores against the world
average. India continues to progress in energy transition and has achieved better scores in
energy security, energy access, regulation, political commitment, infrastructure and business
environment. However, the country is still lagging in dimensions such as environmental
sustainability, energy system structure, institutions, governance, human capital and consumer
participation. To progress further in the clean energy domain, it is critical to have significant
improvement in these dimensions and ensure economic, political and social progress.
C. Renewable Energy Country Attractiveness Index (RECAI)
Since 2003, the biannual RECAI
3
by Ernst & Young (EY) ranks top 40 markets on the
basis of investment made in the renewable energy sector. The index ranks the performance
of economies on the basis of several questions related to energy supply, ability to use
renewables, infrastructure, finance, renewable technologies, strength of natural resources,
macro-economic stability, ease of doing business, etc.
1
Edition 53 - May 2019
Edition 55 - May 2020
Edition 56 - Nov 2020
Edition 57 - May 2021
Edition 58 - Oct 2021
Edition 54 - Oct 2019
2
United States 1
India 3
China Mainland 2
France 4
United Kingdom 5
Germany 6
Australia 7
Japan 8
Brazil 9
Spain 10
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Fig 2.5: Top 10 ranked countries and their performance since 2019.
Source: Renewable Energy Country Attractiveness Index (RECAI) 2021.
3 Renewable Energy Country Attractiveness Index (RECAI) 2021. https://www.ey.com/en_in/recai Review of the Global & National Indices
10State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
Technology-specific scores
Rank
Previous
rank
Movement
on
previous
index
(RECAI
2020)
Country/
region
RECAI
score
Onshore
wind
Offshore
wind
Solar
PV
Solar
CSP
Bio
mass
Geo
thermal
Hydro
1 1 US 72.8 58.3 59.857.946.343.346.339.9
2 2
Mainland
China
70.7 54.8 56.860.253.950.828.354.3
3 3 India 70.2 54.3 28.862.449.645.125.146.2
4 5 France 67.4 54.8 51.953.122.745.939.040.6
5 4 UK 67.3 57.1 61.446.514.854.128.738.7
6 7 Germany 67.0 51.3 51.452.416.849.340.334.3
7 6 Australia66.9 53.3 33.156.141.538.517.426.6
8 8 Japan 65.4 50.1 51.349.619.355.644.540.0
9 11 Brazil 61.9 54.0 31.052.421.847.912.945.7
10 10 Spain 61.2 47.8 26.151.028.036.614.622.4
11 9 Netherlands61.0 48.3 44.846.315.044.418.421.2
12 12 Chile 60.8 50.4 20.448.644.541.446.344.0
13 15 Italy 59.7 44.7 31.248.841.338.942.244.9
14 14 Ireland59.6 47.5 41.343.918.741.818.222.2
15 13 Denmark 59.3 49.4 49.043.515.240.114.317.0
16 16 Morocco 58.1 45.0 17.250.449.625.813.733.7
Fig 2.6: RECAI score, previous rank and technology-specific scores of top 16 countries
Source: Renewable Energy Country Attractiveness Index (RECAI) 2021.
India’s position
India ranked 3
rd
with a 70.2 RECAI score, closely following China (2
nd
) with a 70.7 RECAI
score and the US (1
st
) with a 72.8 RECAI score. India has retained the 3
rd
position again
in the 58th edition of ‘Renewable Energy Country Attractiveness Index (RECAI) 2021’
released by EY. The RECAI highlights corporate Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) as
an emerging driver of clean energy growth. The ranking also reflects an assessment of
market attractiveness and global market trends, when investors and firms are prioritising
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) measures worldwide. The country’s ongoing
growth in renewable energy market conditions, inclusive policies and technological
advancements have showcased the country’s interest in the clean energy transition. The
US is expected to hold its position in RECAI, with new initiatives being announced recently.
Furthermore, favorable regulatory policies and investment conditions would continue to
aid top-performing markets in China and India. Review of the Global & National Indices
11State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
D. Climate Change Performance Index 2022
Germanwatch along with New Climate Institute and Climate Action Network International
publishes the Climate Change Performance Index (CCPI)
4
. CCPI analyses and compares
the climate protection performance of 63 countries and the European Union (EU). The
index evaluates emission levels and promotes transparency in international climate politics.
The CCPI measures a country’s progress towards the Nationally Determined Contributions
(NDCs) and 2030 targets. The national performances are assessed based on 14 indicators
under four major categories: GHG emissions (40%), Renewable energy (20%), Energy
use (20%) and Climate policy (20%). Based on the defined criteria, the index aims to
compare mitigation efforts and progress of countries responsible for more than 90% of
global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The report noted that no country has performed
well enough in all categories and hence, the top three places in the overall ranking remain
empty. Three developing countries have secured places among the top ten ranking in CCPI
2022, Morocco (8th), Chile (9th) and India (10th). Despite operational inefficiencies led by
the COVID-19 pandemic, India has retained 10
th
position in CCPI 2022.
Table 2. 1: Climate Change Performance Index 2022 (Top 10 countries) – Rating table
RankCountryScore
1--
2--
3--
4Denmark76.67
5Sweden74.22
6Norway73.29
7United Kingdom73.09
8Morocco71.60
9Chile69.51
10India69.20
31.429.1014.681469.2
GHG Emissions Renewable Energy Energy Use Climate Policy CCPI Rating
Fig 2.7: CCPI Scorecard, India 2022
Source: CCPI 2022
India’s position
Fig 2.7 gives the performance scores of India for each category and overall score. India’s
performance was ranked ‘High’ in 3 of the 4 categories (GHG Emissions, Energy Use
and Climate Policy). To evaluate GHG Emissions, 4 indicators have been used. The GHG
4 Climate Change Performance Index, 2022. https://ccpi.org/ Review of the Global & National Indices
12State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
emissions per capita at the current level including Land use, land-use change and forestry
(LULUCF), GHG per capita- current trend (excluding LULUCF), GHG per capita compared
to a well-below-2° benchmark and GHG 2030 target - compared to the well-below-2°
benchmark are used as indicators with a weightage of 10% each. India has performed
very high in all except for the Renewable Energy. Several schemes have given the country,
the impetus it needed to remain on schedule to achieve its 2030 emissions target and
Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) goals. In the Energy Use category, 4 indicators
with 5% of weightage, each was chosen. The indicators are Energy Use per capita at
the current level, current trend, compared to the well-below-2° benchmark and Energy
Use 2030 target when compared to the well-below-2° benchmark. India aims to have a
30% EV share among four-wheelers by 2030, with many initiatives to boost its adoption.
The aggressive electrification schemes have resulted in near-universal electrification and
increased clean energy use.
India has been ranked average in both the indicators of the Climate Policy category
(National and International Climate Policies with 5% weightage each). The report notes
that the country should set a target to achieve net-zero status and strengthen its policies
for mitigating climate vulnerability. Lastly, though India has set an ambitious target of
renewable electricity capacity of 500 GW, it was ranked ‘Medium’ in the Renewable Energy
category. This is because there is much scope for the growth of renewable energy in this
tropical country.
Table 2.2: Summarised list of Global indices and India’s ranking
Index
World Energy
Trilemma Index
(WETI)
Energy
Transition
Index (ETI)
Renewable
Energy Country
Attractiveness
Index (RECAI)
Climate Change
Performance
Index (CCPI)
Publishing
Agency
World Energy Council
World
Economic
Forum (WEF)
Ernst & Young (EY)Germanwatch e.V.
What it
measures
Measures energy
system performance
in terms of Energy
Security, Energy
Equity, Environmental
Sustainability in
Country context
Checks
nation’s
energy system
information
Ranks performance
of economies based
on the investment
made in the
renewable energy
sector -energy
supply, renewable
technologies, & ease
of doing business
Measures
country’s progress
towards the
NDC 2030 targets
and compares
climate protection
performance of
countries
India’s
Rank
75/127 (2021) 87/115 (2021)3/40 (2021) 10/63 (2022)
Best
performing
countries
Top 3: Sweden,
Switzerland, Denmark
Top 3: Sweden,
Norway,
Denmark
Top 2: USA &
Mainland China
Top 6: Denmark
(4
th
), Sweden (5
th
),
Norway (6
th
) Review of the Global & National Indices
13State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
2.2. NATIONAL INDICES
A. State Energy Efficiency Index
The State Energy Efficiency Index
5
framework was jointly conceptualized by NITI Aayog,
BEE and AEEE, after which it went through an extensive review, both at NITI Aayog and
BEE. The composition of the Index has been developed considering energy consumption,
energy-saving potential and states’ influence in implementing energy efficiency in buildings,
industry, municipalities, transport, agriculture and DISCOMs. It examines states’ policies and
regulations, financing mechanisms, institutional capacity, adoption of energy efficiency and
energy savings.
SEEI 2020 evaluated 36 states and UTs using 68 indicators. These indicators were
qualitative, quantitative and outcome-based. They belonged to 6 categories – buildings
(16), industry (10), municipalities (11), transport (10), agriculture and DISCOMs (14) and
cross-sector (7). Based on the scores, all states/UTs were classified into Front Runner,
Achiever, Contender and Aspirant. Group 1 states have the highest TFEC while Group 4
has the lowest TFEC. From Fig 2.8, it can be seen that Karnataka is the top-performing
state with a score of 70 followed by Rajasthan with a score of 61. Both these states have
been categorized as Front Runners. Compared to the previous year’s performance (i.e.,
SEEI 2019), Rajasthan and Maharashtra have improved the most, with the difference in
scores being 42.5 and 19.5 respectively.
Karnataka70
61
59.5
57.5
51.5
35.5
34
31
29.5
17.5
58
53
50.5
State-wise SEEI-2020 Score
29
28.5
23
17
16
31
26.5
24.5
14
13.5
13.5
13.5
11.5
9.5
9
8
6.5
5.5
5
3.5
23.5
Cross Sector
Ag&DISCOM
Transport
Municipalities
Industry
Buildings
9.5
8.5
Rajasthan
Haryana
Maharashtra
Tamil Nadu
Uttar Pradesh
Gujarat
Madhya Pradesh
Odisha
West Bengal
Punjab
Kerala
Andhra Pradesh
Delhi
Telangana
Chhattisgarh
Jharkhand
Bihar
Assam
Uttarakhand
Himachal Pradesh
Meghalaya
Goa
Jammu & Kashmir
Dadar Nagar & Daman Diu
Puducherry
Chandigarh
Tripura
Andaman & Nicobar
Sikkim
Mizoram
Arunachal Pradesh
Manipur
Nagaland
Lakshadweep
Ladakh
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Scores
Group 1Group 2Group 3Group 4
Fig 2.8: State-wise SEEI-2020 Score
5 State Energy Efficiency Index, 2020. https://stateenergyefficiencyindex.in/wpcontent/uploads/2021/10/SEEI-2020-
Report-Final-web.pdf Review of the Global & National Indices
14State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
B. Ranking & Annual Integrated Rating: State Distribution Utilities
Integrated Rating Methodology
6
was formulated in 2012 by the Ministry of Power. This
rating exercise is undertaken annually by Power Finance Corporation Ltd. (PFC) and 2
designated credit rating agencies - ICRA and CARE. PFC has also been publishing a
comprehensive report
7
on the financial and operational parameters annually, since 2004.
For the year 2019-20, 115 utilities have been considered (66 DISCOMs, 23 power generation
utilities, 22 power transmission utilities and 4 power trading utilities). Of these, 96 have
submitted audited accounts, 8 have provided provisional accounts and the rest 10 are
power departments that don’t prepare annual accounts, due to which information provided
in tariff petition has been used instead.
A review of all existing indices reveals that there is no comprehensive index to evaluate
the performance of the states in the energy sector. A comprehensive index should ideally
cover affordability, accessibility, efficiency, distributors performance and climate friendliness
of all forms of energy. This formed the motivation for formulating the State Energy &
Climate Index. This index is envisaged to be at par with the international indices covering
the entire energy value-chain.
6 Ranking and ninth Annual Integrated Rating: State Distribution Utilities (July, 2021). https://pfcindia.com/
DocumentRepository/ckfinder/files/GoI_Initiatives/Annual_Integrated_Ratings_of_State_DISCOMs/9th%20
Integrated%20Rating%20Booklet.pdf
7 Report on Performance of Power Utilities, 2019-20. https://pfcindia.com/DocumentRepository/ckfinder/
files/Operations/Performance_Reports_of_State_Power_Utilities/Report_on_Performance_of_Power_
Utilities_2019_20_29092021.pdf 3
STATE ENERGY &
CLIMATE INDEX (SECI) State Energy & Climate Index (SECI)
16State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
3.1. INTRODUCTION
With a population of 1.3 billion, India has a massive demand for energy to run this growing
economy. Since 2000, India has been responsible for more than 10% of growth in the
world’s energy demand and India’s per capita energy demand has increased by more than
60 percent
8
. The per capita electricity consumption in 2018-19 was 1181 kWh, which is just
1/3
rd
of the world’s average per capita electricity consumption of 3260 kWh. Also, it is
lower than other developing countries like Brazil and China. There has been a marginal
improvement over 2018-19 and the same has increased to 1208 kWh in 2019-2020
9
.
India’s energy use has doubled from 2000-level, due to an increase in income and improved
standard of living
8
. Almost 80% of the country’s energy requirements are met by coal,
oil, natural gas and solid biomass
8
. India’s per capita emission is quite low but in absolute
terms, it is the 3
rd
largest greenhouse gas emitter (country-wise) in the world. With the
robust renewable energy installation target, India may considerably reduce the overall
emissions. India’s ongoing industrialisation and urbanisation will place enormous pressure
on the energy sector, therefore decarbonising the demand and supply sectors would be
critical to reduce emissions.
3.2. INDIA AT GLOBAL STAGE
India has taken several measures at the international, national and state levels to address
the energy and climate issues. NITI Aayog presented India’s 2
nd
Voluntary National Review
(VNR) in 2020 at the UN High-Level Political Forum (HLPF)
10
. India’s achievements
highlighted at the forum include electrifying more than 600,000 villages, an 80 million
homes receiving clean fuel for cooking, for first time since 2015 and use of energy efficient
appliances resulting in savings of almost 38 MT of CO
2
annually
11
. The efforts have been
highly appreciated and India is said to be on track to achieve its goals as per the Paris
Agreement
11
. India has also announced to reach net-zero emissions by 2070 at the COP26
UN Climate Change Conference held in Glasgow. The Honourable Prime Minister presented
five nectar elements, Panchamrit, to deal with climate change:
1. India will reach its non-fossil installed electricity capacity to 500 GW by 2030.
2. India will meet 50 percent of its electricity requirements from renewable energy
by 2030.
3. India will reduce the total projected carbon emissions by one billion tonnes from
now onwards till 2030.
4. By 2030, India will reduce the carbon intensity of its economy by less than
45 percent.
5. By the year 2070, India will achieve the target of Net-zero.
These panchamrits will be an unprecedented contribution of India to climate action
12
.
8 India Energy Outlook 2021.
9 https://pqars.nic.in/annex/253/AU2366.pdf
10 https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleseDetailm.aspx?PRID=1638261
11 India VNR 2020 Decade of Action Taking SDGs from Global to Local Report
12 https://pib.gov.in/PressReleseDetail.aspx?PRID=1768712 State Energy & Climate Index (SECI)
17State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
Recently, India ranked 10
th
, 2
nd
time in a row, as per the Climate Change Performance Index
(CCPI 2022), as a high-performing country
13
. India is one of the countries that occupy the
center stage in the world’s quest for clean energy transition and mitigation of climate
change. States and UTs have to play a pivotal role in implementing the policies and
realising the goals set. The government has given thrust to improve downstream delivery
with an aim to improve transmission, distribution infrastructure and financial position of
distribution companies; access to clean cooking fuel through efficient and affordable fuel
and ensure 24*7 hours supply of electricity. All these efforts require differential planning
and execution. Under cooperative and competitive federalism, ranking the state’s initiatives
can play an important role to improve performance. Rankings will be useful for policy-
makers and the state authorities in identifying the leaders and the laggards in the energy
sector, and fine-tuning the policies to promote better energy deployment.
The SECI developed by NITI Aayog which includes 27 indicators under 6 parameters is
expected to play crucial role in pushing the states to adopt best practices and move the
needle on clean energy transition.
3.3. DISCOM’S PERFORMANCE
To provide electricity to a massive population of 1.3 billion individuals and integrate this
with the vision of using renewable energy sources, the efficiency of the DISCOM sector
in India is at the apex of priorities of the policymakers and scientific community of the
country.
In recent years, India has achieved significant milestones in electricity production and
supply. Being the second-most populous nation on the planet, India has the world’s largest
and most complex power sectors. Highlighting the achievements, we have ensured the
availability of electricity to almost 98% of our population. Power distribution is an integral
part of the value chain of the Indian power sector. Unfortunately, the power distribution
companies (DISCOMs) had accumulated financial losses to the tune of Rs 5.07 lakh crore
in the year 2019-20
14
.
To accurately evaluate the financial health of these DISCOMs, the debt-to-equity ratio,
regulatory assets and open access charges have been considered as indicators. Further,
implementing time of day or time of use tariff structure has also been considered one of
the indicator. To gauge the operational health of the system, AT&C losses, ACS-ARR gap and
the T&D losses have been considered as indicators. These indicators will show where the
states need to focus to curb any losses in the system to improve the DISCOMs efficiency.
A series of schemes were launched, by central and state governments, to upgrade the
distribution infrastructure and improve DISCOM finances.
13 https://ccpi.org/wp-content/uploads/CCPI-2022-Results_neu.pdf
14 https://www.pfcindia.com/DocumentRepository/ckfinder/files/Operations/Performance_Reports_of_State_Power_
Utilities/Report_on_Performance_of_Power_Utilities_201920_1.pdf State Energy & Climate Index (SECI)
18State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
3.4. ACCESS, AFFORDABILITY AND RELIABILITY OF ENERGY
It is imperative for the citizens to have access to clean energy. The Council on Energy,
Environment and Water (CEEW) undertakes an annual exercise called Indian Residential
Energy Survey (IRES) for 21 states for their residential electric supply
15
. IRES 2020 concluded
that Indian homes receive 20.6 hours of average daily electricity supply. Urban residents
receive supply for 22.3 hours daily, while rural residences receive only 19.9 hours. Delhi,
Gujarat, Tamil Nadu and Kerala have performed well by supplying 23 hours on an average
whereas Jharkhand, Bihar, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh and Assam experience power outages
for long periods.
Deendayal Upadhyaya Gram Jyoti Yojana (DDUGJY) scheme was launched in 2014 with a
budget outlay of Rs. 43,033 crores. All DISCOMs were made eligible for financial assistance
under this scheme
16
. It facilitated the separation of agricultural and non-agricultural feeders
in the rural areas (to avoid the over-compensation of agriculture load
17
); strengthened and
augmented sub-transmission and distribution infrastructure (including metering); carried
forward with rural electrification (which was supported by the Saubhagya scheme)
16
.
The Saubhagya (Pradhan Mantri Sahaj Bijli Har Ghar Yojana) scheme, the world’s largest
universal electrification scheme, was launched in 2017 to focus on the last-mile connectivity
to all unelectrified households. Standalone electric grids were provided where connection
to the main power grid was not possible
18
. Pradhan Mantri Sahaj Bijli Har Ghar Yojana (also
known as Saubhagya) scheme actively improved the availability of electricity to these states
from 12.5 hours in 2015 to 18.5 hours in 2020. Indicators have been chosen accordingly,
in order to capture the efforts made by the states and the nation to provide clean and
affordable energy to all. Thus, the daily supply of electricity for industrial and agricultural
loads has been considered. Further, cross-subsidization and lifeline electricity tariffs will aid
in gauging the efforts made by the states to provide support to low-income households
and industry. Additionally, the per capita energy consumption of the state will serve as a
measure of the status of access, affordability of energy.
15 State of Electricity Access in India : Insights from the India Residential Energy Survey (IRES) 2020, CEEW Report
(https://www.ceew.in/sites/default/files/ceew-research-on-state-of-electricty-access-and-coverage-in-india.pdf)
16 http://www.ddugjy.gov.in/assets/uploads/1548234273fykio.pdf
17 IEA India 2020 Energy Policy Review
18 https://powermin.gov.in/en/content/saubhagya State Energy & Climate Index (SECI)
19State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
3.5. CLEAN ENERGY INITIATIVE
Due to the aggressive push by the government, great strides have been made towards
increasing renewable capacity. An action plan for achieving 175GW installation of renewable
energy capacity by 2022 was released
19
. It includes 100GW of solar energy (of which solar
PV rooftop contributes to 40GW), 60GW of wind energy, 10GW of biomass energy and
5GW of small hydropower. The new target includes 500 GW of RE capacity by 2030 with
280 GW solar, 140 GW wind, 30 GW others and 50 GW hydropower. This transition in
the generation mix has created a need for change in the power grid infrastructure. Thus,
Green Energy Corridors Project was launched with an initial budget of Rs. 34,141 crores
to integrate renewable energy capacity of 32,713 MW with the existing grid
20
. Hence, the
extent of penetration of renewable energy has been adopted as one of the indicators
under this parameter.
The Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas (MoPNG) introduced its flagship scheme called
Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana (PMUY) in 2016, with the aim to increase the uptake and
usage of LPG in rural areas. This has been undertaken with the intention of weaning rural
women off traditional cooking fuels like firewood, cow-dung and coal, which are freely
available but can cause a detrimental and fatal impact on the health of the users
21
. The
scheme has significantly helped the national and sub-national governments to increase
the LPG coverage. This massive effort has been supported by Pratyaksh Hanstantrit Labh
(PAHAL) scheme which is a Direct Benefits Transfer (DBT) process for LPG consumers
through which households can receive subsidies
22
. These consistent and enormous efforts
have been captured under the “Clean Cooking Fuel Supply” indicator.
In 2018, the Ministry of Transport announced that CNG and electric vehicles will not need
road permits. MoPNG has also announced the Natural Gas Infrastructure Development Plan
with the target of increasing the total number of CNG stations from 1,400 at present to
10,000 over the next few years. With an objective to capture the efforts of the government
to push clean transport, an indicator has been added to evaluate the extent of penetration
of CNG vehicles.
3.6. ENERGY EFFICIENCY
Energy intensity is a very important and insightful metric as it shows the energy
consumed per unit of GDP. This shows how efficiently the states have utilized the energy
available to them to produce their respective GDPs. India recorded an energy intensity
of 0.106 koe/$15p while the world’s energy intensity for 2020 stands at 0.114 koe/$15p
23
.
19 Standing Committee Report Summary-Action plan for achievement of 175 GW renewable energy target, PRS
Legislative Research “PRS”
20 https://powermin.gov.in/en/content/transmission-works-under-green-energy-corridors-i
21 https://www.pmuy.gov.in/about.html
22 http://petroleum.nic.in/dbt/DBTL_Handbook.pdf
23 https://yearbook.enerdata.net/total-energy/world-energy-intensity-gdp-data.html State Energy & Climate Index (SECI)
20State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
According to Energy Efficiency 2020 report by IEA
24
, global energy efficiency improved
at the rate of 1.5% and 1.6% for 2018 and 2019, respectively. However, due to COVID-19,
energy intensity was projected to improve by only 0.8% in 2020. In this report, the energy
intensity of all states and UTs have been measured.
Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE) was set up within the purview of the Ministry of
Power (MoP) in 2002, under the provisions of the Energy Conservation Act, 2001
25
. It
has initiated many schemes since its formation, for example, Energy Conservation Building
Codes (ECBC), Demand Side Management (DSM), Capacity Building of DISCOMs, Energy
Efficiency in Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Sector, etc.
As per the estimates for India, most of the buildings that will exist in 2040 are yet to
be built
8
. This provides a huge potential for energy conservation in the building sector.
Realizing this, the Ministry of Power, Government of India in collaboration with BEE released
Eco-Niwas Samhita in 2018, along with a compliance tool calculator
26
. It is called the
energy conservation code for residential buildings. The commercial building ECBC was
revised in 2017
8
. As of March 2020, 14 states and 2 UTs (Rajasthan, Odisha, Uttarakhand,
Punjab, Karnataka, Haryana, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, West Bengal, Uttar Pradesh,
Puducherry, and Andaman & Nicobar Islands) have notified ECBC about their status
27
.
Perform, Achieve and Trade (PAT) scheme was launched by BEE under the National
Mission for Enhanced Energy Efficiency (NMEEE) to boost energy efficiency for energy-
intensive industries
28
. BEE has also developed the State Energy Efficiency Index (SEEI)
in collaboration with the Alliance for an Energy Efficient Economy (AEEE). The goal of
releasing such an index is to help drive energy efficiency measures, ensure implementation
of the developed policies, and successfully monitor the progress and performance of all
the states.
The State Energy & Climate Index consists of three indicators to capture the state’s
performance in terms of energy efficiency. These indicators are Energy intensity, Energy
saving in commercial and public buildings, and Industrial energy saving due to proper
implementation of energy-efficient and energy-saving measures by the industry.
3.7. ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY
According to the Paris Agreement of COP21 in 2015, all participating nations must agree
to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions in a bid to limit the increase in the global
temperature to 1.5°C for this century
29
. A national action plan called Nationally Determined
24 https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/59268647-0b70-4e7b-9f78-269e5ee93f26/Energy_Efficiency_2020.pdf
25 https://beeindia.gov.in/content/about-bee
26 https://www.beepindia.org/eco-niwassamhita/
27 Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE) Annual Report 2019-20
28 https://www.beeindia.gov.in/content/pat-read-more
29 https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/paris-agreement State Energy & Climate Index (SECI)
21State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
Contribution (NDC) was charted for all countries whose progress will be reviewed every
five years. According to India’s NDC for the period 2021-30
30
, the nation has pledged to
decrease its emission intensity of GDP by 33-35% by 2030 from the 2005 level. As per
biennial Report, it has reduced its emission intensity of GDP by 24% between 2005 and
2016. Further with Prime Minister’s announcement in COP 26, India is committed to raise
the non-fossil fuel-based installed electricity capacity of the country to 500 GW by 2030;
reduce the total projected carbon emission by one billion tonnes between now and the
year 2030 and reduce the carbon intensity of the economy by 45% by 2030.
As announced in COP 26 the country would strive to become carbon neutral and achieve
net-zero emissions by the year 2070. Therefore, it becomes imperative to quantify the
performance of the states with respect to indicators such as forest cover, emission intensity,
carbon sink capacity, and utilization of renewable sources. As per ISFR-2019, the total
forest and tree cover of the country is 80.73 million hectare which is 24.56 percent of the
geographical area of the country.31 India is one of the few countries which has managed to
increase its forest cover and adhered to the NDCs. The regular capture of data will provide
the status of efforts undertaken by the states and will identify areas of improvement.
3.8. NEW INITIATIVES
Many initiatives have been announced to transform the Indian energy sector. Amongst
many initiatives, penetration of EVs into the automobile market, availability of charging
stations to facilitate charging of EVs and the proportion of consumers who have installed
smart meters have been taken as indicators.
Faster Adoption and Manufacturing of (Hybrid &) Electric Vehicles in India (FAME India)
was launched in 2015 to promote HEVs and EVs throughout their supply chain
32
. The
1
st
phase lasted until April 2019 after which, the 2
nd
phase was launched. Around 2.78 lakh
EVs were supported with demand incentives of about Rs. 343 crores in the 1
st
phase
32
while
more EVs will be sold in the 2
nd
phase
32
. In 2020, the government-sanctioned 670 e-buses
in Maharashtra, Goa, Gujarat, and Chandigarh and 241 charging stations in 7 cities (Indore,
Tiruchirapalli, Port Blair, Kollam, Thiruvananthapuram, Malappuram, and Surat)
33
. Awareness
about electric vehicles seem to be on the rise. However, policy-wise, only 13 states have
formulated policies related to EVs.
The distribution system lacks adequate metering, which makes it difficult to improve the
system’s operational efficiency. To tackle this issue, the National Smart Grid Mission was
launched in 2015. It aims to set up a mechanism for planning, implementing, and monitoring
30 https://www.globalissues.org/news/2021/03/16/27388
31 https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=1597987
32 https://www.pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=191377#:~:text=FAME%20India%20Scheme%20The%20
National%20Electric%20Mobility%20Mission,electric%20vehicles%20and%20their%20manufacturing%20in%20
the%20country
https://fame2.heavyindustries.gov.in/
33 https://www.jagranjosh.com/general-knowledge/fame-india-scheme-1601543765-1 State Energy & Climate Index (SECI)
22State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
policies in the smart grid domain
17
. According to the UDAY scheme, all consumers with
consumption of more than 200 units per month must compulsorily install smart meters
34
.
Energy Efficiency Services Limited (EESL), a government-owned energy services company,
has signed an MoU which targets to replace 250 million conventional meters with smart
meters under the Smart Meter National Programme (SMNP)
35
. This will improve metering
and consumption transparency and avoid the errors and costs that come with a manual
billing
35
.
India has launched many other initiatives (for example, battery storage and green hydrogen)
which may be included in future exercises. National Mission on Transformative Mobility and
Battery Storage was unveiled in 2019. Also, the National Hydrogen Energy Mission (NHEM)
was announced in the Union Budget 2021. NHEM will focus on green hydrogen and its end
users – fertilizer, refinery industry, and steel industry etc. India was also one of the first
countries to launch a cooling plan (India Cooling Action Plan – ICAP) to address cooling
requirements across sectors and formulate action points to decrease cooling demand
36
. The
Government of India has also identified new areas to achieve higher levels of penetration
of Renewable energy by proposing certain amendments to Energy Conservation Act, 2001.
The proposed changes to the EC Act will boost the adoption of clean technologies in
various sectors of the economy. The provisions would facilitate the promotion of green
Hydrogen as an alternative to the existing fossil fuels used by the industries. Amongst
various parameters, only those indicators have been taken into consideration where data
is reliable. This edition of the SECI report reveals that data on many important variables
is not always available at the state level and going forward there is a need to develop
systems for robust capturing of such data in this essential sector so that they can be
included in the next version.
34 https://www.uday.gov.in/Targeted-Activites.php
35 https://eeslindia.org/en/smart-meters/
36 https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=1568328 4
METHODOLOGY Methodology
24State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
4.1. SELECTION OF INDICATORS AND DATA COLLECTION
The process of formulating India’s State Energy & Climate Index started with finalization
of parameters and indicators after several rounds of brainstorming sessions & discussions
with experts from different institutions and the relevant ministries. An iterative method was
followed to reach the final set of indicators with follow-up meetings held with experts.
The institutes and ministries involved in the discussion were - IIT Bombay, IIT Kanpur,
CEEW, TERI, Prayas, Ministry of Power (MoP), Central Electricity Authority (CEA), Ministry
of Power (MoP), Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas (MoPNG), Petroleum, Planning &
Analysis Cell (PPAC), Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change (MoEFCC), Bureau
of Energy Efficiency (BEE), Alliance for an Energy Efficient Economy (AEEE). The data was
primarily provided by different ministries – Central Electricity Authority, Petroleum Planning
& analysis Cell, Ministry of Road Transport & Highways etc. For some of the indicators, the
data was compiled from secondary sources - Handbook of Statistics on Indian Economy
by Power Finance Corporation (PFC), Ready Reckoner by PFC. The index consists of six
parameters and 27 indicators (See Annexure 3). The data collected is for 2019-20. The
indicators have been selected based on their importance and availability of reliable annual
data from existing data sources.
The State Energy & Climate Index consists of 6 Parameters and 27 Key Performance
Indicators (KPIs).
Parameters (6) Weightage (100%) Indicators (27)
Progressive & Regressive
DISCOM’S Performance
Access, Afordability and
Reliability of Energy
Clean Energy Initiatives
Energy Efciency
Environmental Sustainability
New Initiatives
40%
15%
15%
6%
12%
12%
9
5
3
3
4
3
DISCOMS performance with eight indicators is the most important parameter because
DISCOMs are the important link in the entire energy value chain and its performance
has been assigned with higher weightage (40%). The other parameters such as Methodology
25State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
‘access, affordability & reliability of energy’, ‘clean energy initiatives’, ‘energy efficiency’,
‘environmental sustainability, and ‘new initiatives’ have been assigned 15%, 15%, 6%, 12%,
and 12% weightage respectively. The State Energy & Climate Index ranks the performance
of the states in the energy and climate sector. The list of indicators under each parameter
is given below. See Annexure 3 for definition, weights, and data source of indicators.
Table 4. 1: State Energy & Climate Index: Parameter wise list of indicators
S.No.Indicator NameWeightage
Parameter 1: DISCOM’s Performance40
1.1Debt Equity Ratio5
1.2AT&C Losses7
1.3T&D Losses5
1.4ACS – ARR gap7
1.5Implementation of ToD/ToU tariff for Consumers2.5
1.6States Implemented DBT Transfer2.5
1.7Open Access Surcharge5
1.8Regulatory Assets3
1.9Complexity of Tariff3
Parameter 2: Access, affordability & reliability15
2.1Per capita energy consumption4
2.2Hours of Electricity Supplied (Industry)1.5
2.3Hours of Electricity Supplied (Agri)1.5
2.4Cross-Subsidization5
2.5Life-line electricity and tariff3
Parameter 3: Clean Energy Initiatives15
3.1Clean Cooking Fuel Supply5
3.2Renewable Energy Penetration5
3.3CNG Vehicle Penetration5
Parameter 4: Energy Efficiency6
4.1Energy Intensity of GSDP2
4.2Energy savings in Commercial & Public Buildings2
4.3Industrial energy Savings2
Parameter 5: Environmental Sustainability12
5.1Emission Intensity of GSDP4
5.2Utilization of RE potential2
5.3Percentage change in forest cover w.r.t 20054
5.4Forest carbon stock2
Parameter 6: New Initiatives12
6.1EV penetration4
6.2Availability of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Mobility4
6.3Proportion of consumers with Smart meters4 Methodology
26State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
4.2. MISSING VALUES
For some of the indicators, adequate information was not available from any of the reliable
sources for the states and union territories. The list of states with null values for any
indicator has been provided in the annexure. With an objective to encourage states to
take measures to minimise data gaps in future indexes, null values has been assigned
zero in the final calculation. Annexure 4 provides the list of states with null values under
different indicators.
4.3. CORRELATION MATRIX
The correlation matrix is a tool that has been used to drop indicators with overlapping
domains, and retain unique indicators. Based on the correlation matrix, few indicators were
removed and the final list of 27 key performing indicators was decided. The correlation
matrix of final indicators is given in Annexure 5 and it can be observed that none of these
indicators are highly correlated.
4.4. NORMALISATION OF INDICATORS
The normalisation of indicator values into a standard scale of 0 to 100 has been adopted
to ensure comparability of different indicators. For instance, while debt-equity ratio has
both positive and negative values, AT&C losses & T&D losses are measured as a percentage,
implementation of ToD/ToU tariffs has binary values. All the indicators have different units
of measurement which necessitates standardization to make them comparable. In the
normalised range of zero to 100, the zero indicates the lowest performance, and 100
implies that the target has been achieved. Further, we have two types of indicators -
progressive indicators and regressive indicators (Annexure 2). The normalisation method
for both indicators is explained below:
For progressive indicators – higher values imply better performance and vice-
versa. For example, indicators such as per capita energy consumption, renewable
energy penetration, EV penetration are progressive indicators. The following
formula has been used for normalisation:
{(State’s Actual value-Lowest value)/(Highest value-Lowest value)} * 100
For regressive indicators – lower values mean better performance and vice-versa.
For example, indicators such as AT&C losses, T&D losses, emission intensity,
energy intensity are regressive indicators. The following formula has been used
for normalisation:
{(Highest value-State’s Actual value)/(Highest Value-Lowest value)} * 100 Methodology
27State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
4.5. PARAMETER WISE SCORE
The State/UT-wise score for each parameter was estimated as the weighted average of the
normalised values of all indicators under the parameter. Each parameter and indicator(s)
within the parameter, have different weights decided on the basis of discussion with
experts and stakeholders. The following formula is used for parameter scoring:
j
n
kjikjii= 1
kj
kj
(w × indicator value )
Parameter score =
w∑
Where, w
kji
is weights assigned to individual indicators within each parameters.
Indicator value
kji
: normalised value of the indicator i in j
th
parameter of k
th
state
n
j
number of indicators in each parameter
4.6. COMPOSITE SECI SCORE
The composite score is the weighted mean of all the weighted scores of the indicators, for
each State/UT, assigning different weights to each parameter. This score is an indication
of the overall position of the States/UTs in SECI.
6
kj
j1
Composite SECI score = (Parameter value )
=
∑
Where, parameter value
kj
=
j
n
kjikjii= 1
(w × indicator value )
∑
4.7. CLASSIFICATION OF STATES
For better comparison, the states have been classified as larger states, smaller states and
union territories. The classification is provided in the table below:
Table 4.3: Classification of states as Larger states, Smaller states and UTs
Category No. of States/UTsStates/UTs
Larger states 20
Andhra Pradesh, Assam, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Haryana,
Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Kerala, Rajasthan,
Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Punjab, Tamil Nadu,
Telangana, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, West Bengal
Smaller States 8
Arunachal Pradesh, Goa, Manipur, Mizoram, Nagaland,
Meghalaya, Sikkim, Tripura,
Union
Territories
8
D&N and D&D
37
, Chandigarh, Delhi, J&K
38
, Puducherry, A&N,
Lakshadweep
37 The union territories of Daman & Diu and Dadra & Nagar Haveli is considered together in this study because of
their small size and small population size. The average value of both the states is taken as representative for each.
38 Due to non-availability of separate data for two UTs (J&K and Ladakh), Ladakh is not shown as a separate UT in
this index. However, from the next round of the index, the data for J&K and Ladakh will be collected and shown
separately. Methodology
28State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
4.8. CATEGORIZATION OF STATES ON THE BASIS OF SECI SCORE
The states and UTs are categorised based on Reference Year (2019-20). Composite SECI
Score range as follows:
CategorySECI score
Front-runners
(Top one-third)
Composite SECI score>=46
Achievers
(Middle one-third)
Composite SECI score between
36 and 46
Aspirants
(Lowest one-third)
Composite SECI score<=36
4.9. STATES/MINISTRIES CONSULTATION
Before releasing the final document, the states and ministries were consulted for their
feedback and comments. The comments received from Ministry of Power (MoP), Central
Electricity Authority (CEA), Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change (MoEFCC),
Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE) were thoroughly discussed and incorporated in the
document. The final document with information on parameters, indicators, indicator-wise
raw score, indicator-wise weighted score was shared with each state for their comments
and feedback. The comments were received from few of the states and these were
incorporated in the document. 5
KEY FINDINGS Key Findings
30State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
The State Energy & Climate Index is an outcome of comprehensive research, to appraise the
performance of the states in the energy & climate sector. The framework is an aggregation
of six parameters consisting of twenty-seven indicators, which capture the energy and
climate landscape of the sub-national governments in the country.
COUNTRY-LEVEL ANALYSIS
Before carrying out the state-level analysis of the parameters and indicators, a macro-
picture at the country level is presented in Table 5.1 to understand the performance
of the energy sector in India. A country-level analysis with a comprehensive outline of
India’s strengths and weaknesses in the sector would be extremely helpful in formulating
efficient nationwide policies and strategies. The country-level scores, of each parameter,
are calculated as an average of the state-wise score for their respective parameters. The
overall score for India works out to be 40.6. The average score at the national level
for DISCOM’s performance is 56.8. The average scores of two parameters i.e., access,
affordability & reliability, and environmental sustainability are 46.4 and 37.7 respectively.
The state governments need to improve their performance in terms of clean energy
initiatives and energy efficiency as the national level average score of these parameters
are 22.2 and 29.1 respectively. The all-India average score for new initiatives is 11.1 which
is the lowest among all parameters.
Table 5. 1: All India average score, highest score and lowest score
under each parameter and SECI score
Average score Highest Score Lowest Score
SECI score40.6 55.7 (Chandigarh) 26.9 (Lakshadweep)
DISCOM’s Performance56.8 77.1 (Punjab) 31.1 (Arunachal Pradesh)
Access, Affordability & Reliability 46.4 67.3 (Kerala) 25.9 (Lakshadweep)
Clean Energy Initiatives22.2 69.2 (Chandigarh) 1.9 (Meghalaya)
Energy Efficiency29.1 85.4 (Tamil Nadu) 0.0 (Lakshadweep)
Environmental Sustainability 37.7 62.5 (Chandigarh) 5.8 (Chhattisgarh)
New Initiatives11.1 58.7 (Tripura)0.0 (Andhra Pradesh, A&N)
The raw data for each indicator and all-India average values are given in Annexure 6.
For DISCOM’s performance, the absolute values and the all-India average of all indicators
depict that the DISCOMs still needs huge improvement. The all-India average debt-equity
ratio is 0.011 and a large number of State DISCOMs show a negative net-worth. While
the national target for AT&C losses is 12-15% by 2024-25, twenty-four states had AT&C
losses of more than 15% in 2019-20. Similarly, for the ACS-ARR gap, the national target is
to bring the gap to zero by 2024-25 whereas the positive gap was observed at for large
number of states. Similarly, India’s average T&D losses was 21.3 which is more than twice
the world average and much above the desirable range of 6-8%. A positive observation Key Findings
31State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
is that the states such as Kerala, AP, MP, WB and Delhi have implemented ToD/ToU tariffs
in all three categories and large number of states have implemented these in one of the
two categories. However, India’s average value is 1.4 for Implementation of T0D/ToU Tariff
and zero for implementation of DBT. India’s average open access surcharge was observed
1.5 INR/kWh and average regulatory assets was observed to be Rs.1883.3 crores (highest
being Rs. 23139 crores in Delhi). On the indicator of complexity of tariff, large numbers of
categories of tariffs are prevailing in different states. However, majority of the states have
less than 50 categories of tariffs, which can be further reduced.
For the access, affordability & reliability, India’s average per capita energy consumption is
272 kgoe which is low (this data is low as it has been calculated at consumption end of
the states where biomass and energy loss has not been included due to lack of reliable
state-wise data). In terms of hours of electricity supplied in industrial and agriculture sector
all-India average was 24 and 17.1 hours respectively. Almost all states are providing 24 hours
electricity supply in the industrial sector and almost half of the states are providing,
more than 15 hours of electricity to the agriculture sector. The cross-subsidy value is
ranging up to 5.3 INR/kWh and almost fifty percent of the states have values more than
the all-India average of 1.7 INR/kWh indicating that the industrial sector are paying high
tariffs which may adversely hamper the growth and development of DISCOMs. Similarly,
the National Electricity Policy 2005 aims at providing minimum life-line consumption of
1 unit/household/day electricity. However, the all-India average tariff rate of power in the
slab of 1 KW connection load (100 kWh/month) is 4.1 INR/kWh which is remarkably higher
making electricity unaffordable to the bottom of the pyramid.
For the parameter, Clean Energy Initiatives, the all-India average supply of clean cooking
fuel was observed at 0.029 toe/capita, RE penetration was 19 percent of total electricity
generation and CNG vehicle penetration was 1.2 percent of the total numbers of registered
vehicles.
For the Environmental Sustainability parameter, the forest cover has increased by 9 percent
which is a remarkable progress at national level, and India’s average per hectare carbon
stock was observed at 98.4 tonnes which further needs to be improved. Similarly, for the
New Initiatives parameter, in 2019-20 the all-India average EV penetration was 1.4 percent
and the values of all India average availability of charging infrastructure for E-mobility and
proportion of consumers with smart meters was very low.
STATE-LEVEL ANALYSIS
Given the nation’s leadership at the global stage and its rigorous push towards adopting
renewable energy, it is imperative to understand how the programs and policies are
translating into action at the grassroots level. Thus, a state-level analysis would highlight
the strengths and weaknesses of its various programmes. The SECI scorecard provides
the scores of all states and UTs on 6 parameters along with the final SECI score. Key Findings
32State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
The final SECI score and the parameter-wise scorecard are given in Table 5.2 and Table 5.3.
The SECI score given in the last column is the summation of the weighted values of all
the parameters. The parameter-wise scores are the weighted average of indicators under
respective parameters. The categorisation has been made on the basis of the overall score
range (26.9-55.7) for the reference period 2019-20. As highlighted in section 4.8, the top
one-third are considered as front-runners followed by the middle one-third as achievers
and the last one-third as aspirants.
The final SECI score in Table 5.2 reveals that among larger states, Gujarat, Kerala, Punjab,
Haryana, Uttarakhand, and Maharashtra fall under the category of Front-runners. The states
such as HP, Karnataka, TN, Assam, Telangana, Andhra Pradesh, UP, WB and Bihar are
achievers and the remaining states are aspirants. The highest score of 50.1 was achieved by
Gujarat, followed by Kerala and Punjab with a score of 49.1 and 48.6 respectively. The lowest
score of 31.7 was achieved by Chhattisgarh and it can be observed from the parameters
score that the state has not performed well in terms of clean energy initiatives, energy
efficiency, environmental sustainability, and new initiatives. The performance of Madhya
Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand, and Orissa has greater scope for improvement in terms of
clean energy initiatives, energy efficiency, environmental sustainability, and new initiatives.
Though Gujarat is the best-performing state, its performance in terms of Environmental
Sustainability and New initiatives needs improvement. The SECI score for states such as
Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Karnataka, and Uttar Pradesh was observed within
the range of 40-45.
The score and ranking of small States and Union Territories are given in Table 5.3. The
final SECI score depicts that among the smaller states, Goa and Tripura are front-runners,
Manipur is achiever and remaining smaller states fall in the category of aspirants. The
highest score of 51.4 was achieved by Goa and the lowest score of 27 by Arunachal
Pradesh. Tripura with a score of 58.7 is the best performer all over India in terms of the
new initiative parameter. All the small states are performing average in the category of
environmental sustainability and access, affordability & reliability with scores in range of
55-40 and 60-30 respectively.
In the third category of UTs, D&N/D&D, Chandigarh, Delhi and Puducherry are performing
better and they are in the category of front-runners with a score of 53.2, 55.7, 55.6,
and 48.5 respectively. J&K, A&N, and Lakshadweep fall in the category of aspirants with
scores 29.3, 29.4, and 26.9 respectively. Among the UTs, Delhi has performed well on the
parameter of energy efficiency. In terms of the first parameter of DISCOM’s performance
four UTs have scored above all India average and the overall score is in the range of 25-75.
Similarly, in terms of the second parameter, three UTs have scored above all India average
and the overall score is in the range of 25-61. Except Delhi, all other UTs’ performance
on energy efficiency parameter needs improvement. On the parameter of clean energy
initiatives, Chandigarh, D&D/D&N, and Delhi are performing well with scores of 69.2, 68.6,
and 67.6 respectively. Key Findings
33State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
Overall, more than half of the states scored higher than the average value (40.6). Three
UTs and two states have scored above 50. They are Chandigarh, Delhi, Daman & Diu and
Dadra & Nagar Haveli). Gujarat and Goa are the best-performing states. Through 6 major
parameters and 27 KPIs, an accurate and in-depth visualisation of State/UTs performance
is assessed.
Table 5.2: SECI-Round I Scorecard of Larger States
Score and Ranking of Larger States
Rank States/UTs
DISCOM’s
Performance
Access,
affordability
& reliability
Clean
Energy
Initiatives
Energy
Efficiency
Env
Sustain
ability
New
Initiatives
SECI
score
1 Gujarat 72.7 52.4 39.2 40.1 35.1 5.5 50.1
2 Kerala 64.4 67.3 21.5 58 46.9 7.7 49.1
3 Punjab 77.1 46.8 26.1 35.1 37 2.3 48.6
4 Haryana 69.8 53.6 42.9 11.7 33.4 6.9 47.9
5 Uttarakhand 61.9 55.3 18.5 50.5 48.7 14.7 46.5
6 Maharashtra 57.7 51.2 34 75.7 36.2 10.4 46.0
7
Himachal
Pradesh
57 56.3 14.3 20.1 52.1 38.1 45.4
8 Karnataka 56.8 45.5 27 57.2 41.7 14.5 43.8
9 Tamil Nadu 57.3 46.3 21.7 85.4 39.2 4 43.4
10 Assam 67.3 38.3 4.3 39 39.9 17.6 42.6
11 Telangana 55..1 60.4 18 64.7 34.6 0.4 41.9
12Andhra Pradesh 65..1 42.6 16.9 40 35 0 41.6
13Uttar Pradesh 59.9 37.8 12.6 42 30.9 27.4 41.0
14West Bengal 55.3 52 8.5 27.7 40.9 9 38.9
15 Bihar 61.3 45 4.9 22.8 33.7 7.6 38.3
16 Odisha 59..0 57.4 4.8 21.8 22.6 0.9 37.1
17 Rajasthan 49.2 42.9 15.5 44 31.4 4.8 35.4
18 Jharkhand 58.3 46.5 2.9 17.2 19 9.3 35.2
19Madhya Pradesh 53.7 42.7 6.2 8.3 24.1 3.3 32.6
20 Chhattisgarh 58.4 45.4 2.1 0 5.8 4.2 31.7 Key Findings
34State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
Table 5.3: SECI-Round I Scorecard of Smaller states and Union Territories
Score and ranking of Smaller States
RankStates/UTs
DISCOM’s
Performance
Access,
affordability
& reliability
Clean
Energy
Initiatives
Energy
Efficiency
Env
Sustainability
New
Initiatives
SECI
score
1 Goa 63.4 59.6 62.4 16.6 43.7 12.4 51.4
2 Tripura 57.3 33.1 22.9 31.7 39.6 58.7 45.0
3 Manipur 57.6 34.1 4.7 22.1 41.3 7.3 36.0
4 Mizoram 51.7 39.3 18.9 29.7 38.2 1.1 35.9
5 Sikkim 43.2 37.6 13.8 33.3 52.2 0.6 33.3
6 Meghalaya 47.9 30.9 1.9 4 39.8 2.8 29.4
7 Nagaland 35.9 32.9 12.2 26.4 40 3.4 27.9
8
Arunachal
Pradesh
31.1 43.2 5.8 19.8 49 1.1 27.0
Score and ranking of Union Territories
RankStates/UTs
DISCOM’s
Performance
Access,
affordability
& reliability
Clean
Energy
Initiatives
Energy
Efficiency
Env
Sustainability
New
Initiatives
SECI
score
1Chandigarh 65.6 58.7 69.2 16.2 62.5 14.155.7
2 Delhi 66.2 38.3 67.2 43.9 38.6 49.7 55.6
3
D&D and
D&N
71.5 60.3 68.6 0 36 7.9 53.2
4Puducherry 67.9 57.7 20.3 0.6 42.7 37.9 48.5
5 A&N 37.7 35 20.6 1.3 49.5 0 29.4
6 J&K* 31.2 51.4 11.6 9.9 51.8 4.5 29.3
7Lakshadweep 42.9 25.9 33.6 0 7.1 0 26.9
*inclusive of Ladakh
Overall, among the larger states, the top three performers are Gujarat, Kerala, and Punjab;
and the bottom three performers are Jharkhand, MP and Chhattisgarh. Among the smaller
states, Goa, Tripura, and Manipur are the top performers while Meghalaya, Nagaland and
Arunachal Pradesh are the bottom three states. Among Union Territories Chandigarh, Delhi
and D&D/D&N are the top three performers, and A&N, J&K and Lakshadweep are the
bottom three performers.
Comparing results of SECI to the SEEI-2020, Karnataka, Rajasthan, and Haryana are the
top-performing states. However, as per the SECI-Round I scorecard, among these three
states, Haryana is the only front-runner state (category rank- 4th). Karnataka is in the group
of Achievers (category rank- 8th) and Rajasthan is an Aspirant state with a score of 35.7
(category rank- 17th). As per the findings of both these reports, it can be observed that
the states that are performing well in terms of overall energy efficiency may not necessarily
perform well in the entire energy and climate sector. Key Findings
35State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
Table 5.4: SECI Score-Top three & Bottom three performers
Top Three PerformersBottom Three Performers
Larger States Gujarat, Kerala, Punjab Jharkhand, MP, Chhattisgarh
Smaller States Goa, Tripura, Manipur Meghalaya, Nagaland, Arunachal Pradesh
Union TerritoriesChandigarh, Delhi, D&D and D&N A&N, J&K, Lakshadweep
Larger States Smaller States Union Territory
50.1
49.1
48.6
47.9
46.5
46
45.4
43.8
43.4
42.6
41.9
41.6
41
38.9
38.3
37.1
35.4
35.2
32.6
31.7
51.4
45
36
35.9
33.3
29.4
27.9
27
55.7
55.6
53.2
48.5
29.4
29.3
26.9
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Gujarat
Kerala
Punjab
Haryana
Uttarakhand
Maharashtra
Himachal Pradesh
Karnataka
Tamil Nadu
Assam
Telangana
Andhra Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
West Bengal
Bihar
Odisha
Rajasthan
Jharkhand
Madhya Pradesh
Chhattisgarh
Goa
Tripura
Manipur
Mizoram
Sikkim
Meghalaya
Nagaland
Arunachal Pradesh
Chandigarh
Delhi
D&d/d&n
Puducherry
A&n
J&k
Lakshadweep
Final SECI Score
Fig 5.1: SECI Score-Performance of States & UTs Key Findings
36State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
INDICATOR-WISE PERFORMANCE
1. DISCOM’S PERFORMANCE
The DISCOM’s Performance parameter consists of 9 indicators namely, Debt-equity ratio,
AT&C losses, ACS-ARR gap, T&D losses, ToD/ToU tariffs for consumers, DBT Transfer,
Open access surcharge, Regulatory Assets and Complexity of Tariffs. As shown in Fig 5.2,
Punjab, Gujarat, D&D, Goa have performed well in this parameter. Among larger states,
Punjab is the best performing state because of comparatively higher scores achieved by
Punjab in indicators such as debt-equity ratio, regulatory assets, open access surcharge
and complexity of tariff. Rajasthan has not performed well, as it has scored zero in two
indicators- debt-equity ratio and open access surcharge. It has also scored less in indicators
such as AT&C losses and T&D losses. Among the smaller states, the best performing state
Goa has scored 63.4.
Larger States Smaller States Union Territory
77.1
72.7
69.8
67.3
65.1
64.4
61.9
61.3
59.9
59
58.4
58.3
57.7
57.3
57
56.8
55.3
55.1
53.7
49.2
63.4
57.6
57.3
51.7
47.9
43.2
35.9
31.1
71.5
67.9
66.2
65.6
42.9
37.7
31.2
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Punjab
Gujarat
Haryana
Assam
Andhra Pradesh
Kerala
Uttarakhand
Bihar
Uttar Pradesh
Odisha
Chhattisgarh
Jharkhand
Maharashtra
Tamil Nadu
Himachal Pradesh
Karnataka
West Bengal
Telangana
Madhya Pradesh
Rajasthan
Goa
Manipur
Tripura
Mizoram
Meghalaya
Sikkim
Nagaland
Arunachal Pradesh
D&d/d&n
Puducherry
Delhi
Chandigarh
Lakshadweep
A&n
J&k
DISCOM's Performance
Fig 5.2: Performance of States and UTs for DISCOM’s Performance Parameter Key Findings
37State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
Table 5.5: DISCOM’s performance-Top & Bottom performers
DISCOM’s Performance
CategoryTop performer Scores Bottom performer Scores
Larger statesPunjab 77.1 Rajasthan 49.2
Smaller StatesGoa63.4 Arunachal Pradesh 31.1
Union Territories D&D and D&N 71.5 J&K31.2
2. ACCESS, AFFORDABILITY & RELIABILITY (AAR)
The second parameter used in the study is access, affordability, and reliability of energy.
It consists of five indicators namely; per capita energy consumption, hours of electricity
supplied in agricultural and industrial sectors, cross-subsidization, and life-line electricity &
tariff. The highest score achieved in this category is 67.3 and the lowest score is 25.9. D&N
is the best performing Union Territory. Among larger states, the top performer is Kerala
with a score of 67.3. Kerala scored better in three indicators namely, hours of electricity
supplied in agriculture, hours of electricity supplied in industry and cross-subsidization.
Similarly, among the small states, Goa with a score of 59.6 is the best.
67.3
60.4
57.4
56.3
55.3
53.6
52.4
52
51.2
46.8
46.5
46.3
45.5
45.4
45
42.9
42.7
42.6
38.3
37.8
59.6
43.2
39.3
37.6
34.1
33.1
32.9
30.9
60.3
58.7
57.7
51.4
38.3
35
25.9
0102030405060708090100
Kerala
Telangana
Odisha
Himachal Pradesh
Uttarakhand
Haryana
Gujarat
West Bengal
Maharashtra
Punjab
Jharkhand
Tamil Nadu
Karnataka
Chhattisgarh
Bihar
Rajasthan
Madhya Pradesh
Andhra Pradesh
Assam
Uttar Pradesh
Goa
Arunachal Pradesh
Mizoram
Sikkim
Manipur
Tripura
Nagaland
Meghalaya
D&D/D&N
Chandigarh
Puducherry
J&K
Delhi
A&N
Lakshadweep
Access, Afordability & reliability
Larger States Smaller States Union Territory
Fig 5.4: Performance of States and UTs for Access, Affordability & Reliability Parameter Key Findings
38State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
Table 5.6: Access, Affordability & Reliability-Top & Bottom performers
Access, Affordability & Reliability (AAR)
CategoryTop Performer Scores Bottom performer Scores
Larger statesKerala 67.3 Uttar Pradesh 37.8
Smaller StatesGoa59.6 Meghalaya 30.9
Union Territories D&N and D&D 60.3 Lakshadweep 25.9
3. CLEAN ENERGY INITIATIVES (CEI)
The performance of state/UTs in the third parameter are shown in Fig 5.5. This consists of
three indicators- clean cooking fuel supply, RE penetration and CNG vehicle penetration.
Delhi, Goa, D&D and Chandigarh are better performing than other states/UTs. As shown in
the Table 5.7 Haryana (42.9), Goa (62.4), and Chandigarh (69.2) are the best performing
states/UT among their respective categories. It can be observed from the table that their
is wide variation in scores among all the three categories.
Table 5. 7: Clean Energy Initiatives-Top & Bottom performers
Clean Energy Initiatives (CEI)
CategoryTop Performer Scores Bottom performer Scores
Larger statesHaryana 42.9 Chhattisgarh 2.1
Smaller StatesGoa62.4 Meghalaya 1.9
Union Territories Chandigarh 69.2J&K11.6
42.9
39.2
34
27
26.1
21.7
21.5
18.5
18
16.9
15.5
14.3
12.6
8.5
6.2
4.9
4.8
4.3
2.9
2.1
62.4
22.9
18.9
13.8
12.2
5.8
4.7
1.9
69.2
68.6
67.2
33.6
20.6
20.3
11.6
0102030405060708090100
Haryana
Gujarat
Maharashtra
Karnataka
Punjab
Tamil Nadu
Kerala
Uttarakhand
Telangana
Andhra Pradesh
Rajasthan
Himachal Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
West Bengal
Madhya Pradesh
Bihar
Odisha
Assam
Jharkhand
Chhattisgarh
Goa
Tripura
Mizoram
Sikkim
Nagaland
Arunachal Pradesh
Manipur
Meghalaya
Chandigarh
D&D/D&N
Delhi
Lakshadweep
A&N
Puducherry
J&K
Clean Energy Initiatives
Larger States Smaller States Union Territory
Fig 5.5: Performance of States and UTs for Clean Energy Initiative Parameter Key Findings
39State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
4. ENERGY EFFICIENCY (EE)
The fourth parameter of energy efficiency consists of three indicators related to energy
savings in industry, buildings, and energy intensity. The result is shown in Fig 5.6. Tamil Nadu
and Maharashtra have performed well. The highest score achieved by the states/UTs
under this parameter is 85.4 and the lowest score is zero, showing huge variation in the
performance of the states/UTs. As shown in Table 5.8, Tamil Nadu (85.4), Sikkim (33.3),
and Delhi (43.9) are the best performing states/UTs among their respective categories.
85.4
75.7
64.7
58
57.2
50.5
44
42
40.1
40
39
35.1
27.7
22.8
21.8
20.1
17.2
11.7
8.3
0
33.3
31.7
29.7
26.4
22.1
19.8
16.6
4
43.9
16.2
9.9
1.3
0.6
0
0
0 102030405060708090100
Tamil Nadu
Maharashtra
Telangana
Kerala
Karnataka
Uttarakhand
Rajasthan
Uttar Pradesh
Gujarat
Andhra Pradesh
Assam
Punjab
West Bengal
Bihar
Odisha
Himachal Pradesh
Jharkhand
Haryana
Madhya Pradesh
Chhattisgarh
Sikkim
Tripura
Mizoram
Nagaland
Manipur
Arunachal Pradesh
Goa
Meghalaya
Delhi
Chandigarh
J&K
A&N
Puducherry
D&D/D&N
Lakshadweep
Energy Efciency
Larger States Smaller States Union Territory
Fig 5.6: Performance of States and UTs for Energy Efficiency Parameter Key Findings
40State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
Table 5.8: Energy Efficiency-Top & Bottom performers
Energy Efficiency (EE)
CategoryTop Performer Scores Bottom Performer Scores
Larger states Tamil Nadu 85.4 Chhattisgarh 0.0
Smaller StatesSikkim 33.3 Meghalaya 4
Union Territories Delhi 43.9
D&D and D&N,
Lakshadweep
0.0
5. ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY (ES)
Fig 5.7 represents the performance of the states and UTs on the parameter of environmental
sustainability. This parameter consists of four indicators: energy intensity of GSDP, utilization
of RE potential, percentage change in forest cover, forest carbon stock. The smaller states
have scored better as majority of states- Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Goa, Manipur, and
Nagaland- under this category have scored more than 40 and the difference between the
highest and lowest score is also low. HP (52.1), Sikkim (52.2), and Chandigarh (62.5) are
top-performing states/UTs in their respective categories. The low performing states need
to take initiatives to improve their performance in the respective indicators.
Table 5.9: Environmental Sustainability-Top & Bottom performers
Environmental Sustainability
CategoryTop Performer Scores Bottom Performer Scores
Larger states Himachal Pradesh 52.1 Chhattisgarh 5.8
Smaller StatesSikkim 52.2 Mizoram 38.2
Union Territories Chandigarh 62.5 Lakshadweep 7.1 Key Findings
41State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
52.1
48.7
46.9
41.7
40.9
39.9
39.2
37
36.2
35.1
35
34.6
33.7
33.4
31.4
30.9
24.1
22.6
19
5.8
52.2
49
43.7
41.3
40
39.8
39.6
38.2
62.5
51.8
49.5
42.7
38.6
36
7.1
0102030405060708090100
Himachal Pradesh
Uttarakhand
Kerala
Karnataka
West Bengal
Assam
Tamil Nadu
Punjab
Maharashtra
Gujarat
Andhra Pradesh
Telangana
Bihar
Haryana
Rajasthan
Uttar Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Odisha
Jharkhand
Chhattisgarh
Sikkim
Arunachal Pradesh
Goa
Manipur
Nagaland
Meghalaya
Tripura
Mizoram
Chandigarh
J&K
A&N
Puducherry
Delhi
D&D/D&N
Lakshadweep
Environmental Sustainability
Larger States Smaller States Union Territory
Fig 5.7: Performance of States and UTs for Environmental Sustainability Parameter
6. NEW INITIATIVES (NI)
The performance of states and UTs for the New Initiatives parameter is shown in Fig
5.8. This parameter consists of three indicators related to EV penetration, availability of
charging infrastructure for EV, proportion of consumers with smart meters. However, the
difference between the highest score (58.7) and lowest score (0.00) reveals that there is
huge scope for improvement in the new emerging technologies. Among the larger states,
Himachal Pradesh with a score of 38.1 is the top performer. Tripura (58.7) and Sikkim (0.6)
are the best and worst-performing states, respectively, under the small states category.
Delhi (49.7) is the best performing UT. Key Findings
42State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
38.1
27.4
17.6
14.7
14.5
10.4
9.3
9
7.7
7.6
6.9
5.5
4.8
4.2
4
3.3
2.3
0.9
0.4
0
58.7
12.4
7.3
3.4
2.8
1.1
1.1
0.6
49.7
37.9
14.1
7.9
4.5
0
0
0 102030405060708090100
Himachal Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Assam
Uttarakhand
Karnataka
Maharashtra
Jharkhand
West Bengal
Kerala
Bihar
Haryana
Gujarat
Rajasthan
Chhattisgarh
Tamil Nadu
Madhya Pradesh
Punjab
Odisha
Telangana
Andhra Pradesh
Tripura
Goa
Manipur
Nagaland
Meghalaya
Arunachal Pradesh
Mizoram
Sikkim
Delhi
Puducherry
Chandigarh
D&D/D&N
J&K
A&N
Lakshadweep
New Initiatives
Larger States Smaller States Union Territory
Fig 5.8: Performance of States and UTs for New Initiatives Parameter
Table 5. 10: New Initiatives-Top & Bottom performers
New Initiatives (NI)
CategoryTop Performer Scores Bottom Performer Scores
Larger states Himachal Pradesh 38.1 Andhra Pradesh 0.0
Smaller StatesTripura 58.7 Sikkim 0.6
Union Territories Delhi 49.7
Lakshadweep,
A&N
0.0 6
LEARNINGS Learnings
44State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
A macro-picture at the country level presented in the study helps us to understand the
energy sector’s performance of various states on different dimensions. A state-level analysis
provides a comprehensive outline of state’s strengths and weaknesses in the sector, which
would be extremely helpful in formulating specific policies and strategies. The parameter
‘DISCOM’s performance’ is the highest-scoring parameter, and ‘New Initiatives’ is the
least scoring parameter. GoI schemes such as Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana, Saubhagya
Scheme, state government policies to provide subsidised lifeline tariffs, and GoI’s efforts
to achieve the NDC targets at the national level have helped the parameters – “Access,
Affordability & Reliability of Energy” and “Environmental Sustainability” to garner better
scores. However, the overall SECI score and the scores achieved under each parameter leave
scope for huge improvements. This suggests that while India may possess a conducive
environment and energy-related policies; it is not necessarily translating into transforming
the sector.
The state governments need to prioritise policies to facilitate inclusive growth by providing
affordable, accessible, reliable, and sustainable energy to the citizens. Energy being the
centerpiece of any development process, the government needs to ensure access to
sustainable and clean energy sources through various schemes. Though India has achieved
almost 100 percent electrification, the national and sub-national governments are still
required to work towards ensuring a reliable supply of power, reducing losses, reducing
regulatory assets, etc. The targeted Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) can help reduce leakages
and improve efficiency. Also, future policy direction should aim to amplify energy efficiency
programmes and technological innovation in supply and demand sectors of energy for
better utilisation of existing resources. In the same way, EVs hold enormous potential for
India, and appropriate policy measures are needed by the states/UTs to decarbonise the
transport sector. While renewable energy capacity has been continuously expanding, fossil-
fuel based energy is still an important source of power. The state governments should
work toward meeting future energy needs in a more sustainable way.
STATE-LEVEL ANALYSIS
An efficient energy ecosystem would not only enhance the country’s capacity to fully
utilise renewable energy sources but also enable it to achieve clean energy transition.
This creates a need to analyse the energy value chain comprehensively and capture the
current efficacy levels of the energy ecosystem. State Energy and Climate Index (SECI)
evaluates and analyses the efforts undertaken by the states and Union Territories (UTs) to
efficiently manage the available resources and steer the power sector through a successful
energy transition while taking measures to reduce their impact on the environment. There
is a huge scope for improvement throughout the country and the states should accelerate
their efforts to promote more efficient and easily accessible clean energy sources. To
formulate an appropriate energy transition roadmap, a comprehensive review of state-level
performance in terms of energy consumption, production, and emissions is required. Learnings
45State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
1. DISCOM’S PERFORMANCE
Though the states are striving hard to improve DISCOM’s performance but the challenges
faced by the DISCOM sector, in each state, are very complex. The Central Government
has approved a “Revamped Distribution Sector Scheme - A Reforms based and Results
linked Scheme” which aims to reduce the AT&C losses to pan-India levels of 12-15% and
Average Cost of Supply (ACS) - Average Revenue Realised (ARR) gap to zero by 2024-25.
However, only a few states such as Punjab, Gujarat, Goa, Kerala have AT&C losses below
15 percent, and majority of the states have higher AT&C losses. Similarly, for ACS-ARR
gap, only few states/UTs such as Gujarat, Haryana, Chhattisgarh, Assam, Chandigarh, and
D&D/D&N have ARR greater than ACS while the majority of states have ACS greater than
ARR. Further, the states such as Maharashtra, UP, WB, Karnataka, and Delhi are required
to make efforts to reduce their regulatory assets. Majority of the states have complex
tariff structures.
Though states have scored well in relative terms, however, in absolute terms (refer to
Annex 6) the all-India average values of indicators reveal that a lot of initiatives are required
to improve the sector. Therefore, the states need to strive to solve the problem at the
operational, and technical levels. State DISCOMs may benefit from aggressively using the
revamped central government reform scheme to upgrade their distribution infrastructure
and systems.
2. ACCESS, AFFORDABILITY & RELIABILITY (AAR)
According to the Economic Survey 2018-19, if India has to reach the Human Development
Index (HDI) level of 0.8, which corresponds to high human development, it has to quadruple
its per capita energy consumption. The states need to work together to improve the per
capita energy consumption of the country.
National Electricity Policy-2005 aims at providing minimum lifeline consumption of 1 unit/
household/day electricity as a merit good. The states/UTs that performed well in providing
affordable energy are Tamil Nadu, D&D, and Lakshadweep. The states can improve their
performance by increasing the hours of electricity supplied. Further, the states need to
improve data availability of hours of electricity supply in rural and urban areas, SAIFI
index, etc. so that performance of state/UTs on the parameter accessibility, affordability,
and reliability of energy are evaluated in a better way. Learnings
46State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
3. CLEAN ENERGY INITIATIVES (CEI)
On an average, India has scored 22.6 in CEI parameter, showing that proactive measures
need to be taken to actively initiate clean energy initiatives.
To provide clean cooking fuel and to safeguard the health of women & children, GoI
launched Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojna in 2016. Further, to cut subsidy leakage and increase
the usage of clean fuels, DBT for LPG consumer (DBTL) scheme namely, ‘PAHAL’ was also
been launched. In spite of all these initiatives, states like Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand,
Meghalaya and Nagaland need to put efforts to improve last-mile connectivity and the
availability of clean energy sources for cooking.
In terms of CNG penetration, Delhi is the top performer, and the states- Gujarat, Haryana,
Maharashtra have also performed well. The CNG vehicle penetration depends significantly
on the availability of CNG infrastructure.
4. ENERGY EFFICIENCY (EE)
Tamil Nadu has performed well in the Energy Efficiency parameter. The highest score
in Tamil Nadu is attributed to its efforts toward energy savings in industrial, public, and
commercial buildings sector and comparatively low energy intensity. Almost half of the
states have scored more than the all-India average value of 29.05. The majority of the
states have to be diligent to improve energy efficiency.
The state governments need to understand the importance of energy efficiency measures in
their economic development path and embrace energy efficiency measures to avail energy
saving, emissions reduction, etc. Most of the smaller states have less emission intensity
which is a good sign. Sikkim has scored highest in terms of energy efficiency followed by
Tripura, Mizoram, and Delhi. However, larger states such as Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra and
Telangana are making significant efforts in the adoption of the ECBC (Energy Conservation
Building Code) and are the front-runners in Energy saving in commercial & public buildings.
Tamil Nadu followed by Kerala performed well in terms of industrial energy-saving.
Overall, a greater push towards energy conservation methods can be achieved if states
participate proactively in policy formulation and implementation. The Bureau of Energy
Efficiency (BEE), along with State Designated Agencies (SDAs), has been continuously
trying to develop a robust mechanism for data measurement, management, and analysis.
The Energy Conservation Building Code (ECBC), which sets minimum energy standards
for new commercial buildings, was updated in 2017. BEE also launched the Eco-Niwas
Samhita for residential buildings in December 2018. The Unnat Jyoti by Affordable LEDs
for All (UJALA) programme was launched on 5th January 2015. The state governments
can leverage the benefits of all such schemes that have been announced by the central
agencies in this regard. A well-coordinated plan of action by every state government and
SDAs is the need of the hour if we want to become an energy-efficient economy. Learnings
47State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
5. ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY (ES)
Chandigarh performed better as the installed capacity of renewable energy is maximum
compared to its potential. The state has also worked towards reduction of emission intensity
and also in improving the percentage of forest cover. The forest carbon stock (per ha
stock in tonnes) is highest in Sikkim followed by A&N and J&K. D&D, West Bengal and
Chandigarh are the top three performers in terms of percentage change in forest cover.
On an average, the country has scored 37.7 under the ES parameter, with 50% of states
scoring more than the average value. The national and sub-national governments should
work together towards climate change mitigation and adaptation by mobilizing resources
and enhancing investments in programmes in sectors vulnerable to climate change. The
emphasis on bridging the resource gap, building capacities, creating infrastructure for
quick diffusion of cutting-edge technology for emission reduction, and better utilisation
of renewable resources is required at the state level.
6. NEW INITIATIVES (NI)
Tripura is the top performer in New Initiatives. It has taken appropriate steps to increase the
proportion of consumers with smart meters and improve EV penetration. Tripura, Delhi &
Assam are top-performing states/UTs in terms of highest electric vehicle (EV) penetration.
Himachal Pradesh has developed the highest EV charging infrastructure in its state, in
the year 2019-20. However, lack of data is the major stumbling block that we faced while
devising the parameter and ranking the states in terms of new initiatives. Almost half of
the states have no data on the availability of charging infrastructure and four states have
no data on EV penetration. The problem of paucity of data is not limited to small states
and UTs. Large states such as Andhra Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh have no data for
such indicators, which adversely affects the overall ranking of states. For undertaking new
initiatives related to electric mobility and smart metering technology, the states have to
put up huge efforts. The related data needs to be provided so that performance evaluation
is carried out in a better way.
For instance, the Government of India has identified new areas to achieve higher levels
of penetration of Renewable energy and has proposed certain Amendments to Energy
Conservation Act, 2001. The government is promoting green hydrogen as an alternative
to fossil fuels to be used by the industries and promoting the deployment of clean
technologies. The state governments need to work with national agencies for rolling out
various policy measures at the state level and also to enable data maintenance on each
indicator and parameter.
In the next round of SECI, utmost care will be taken to strengthen data coordination with
states and relevant central agencies. 7
THE WAY FORWARD The Way Forward
50State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
The current energy paradigm is witnessing rapid transformations as countries are moving
towards clean energy transition and net-zero pathways by 2050 and beyond. Calls
for climate-friendly energy systems reached crescendo in 2021 at the COP26 climate
conference. Energy discourse has firmly added sustainability to its portfolio along with
traditional factors such as access, affordability, and energy security. The demography of
energy consumers in India will be dominated by a green-minded young population that will
consume more energy per capita than their predecessors due to better lifestyle aspirations.
As the energy systems are getting transformed by leveraging a multitude of technological
choices, there is immense scope for peer-to-peer learning among states.
SECI is the first step in this journey where states can explore and benchmark themselves on
various parameters. For instance, in terms of energy efficiency, larger states like Tamil Nadu,
and Maharashtra have done well, while in terms of DISCOM’s performance, two small UTs-
D&D and D&N have done well. The best practices for all indicators in better-performing
states can be adopted by other states to improve their performance. SECI will help states
to understand their performance across multiple parameters/indicators. This document
also intends to create awareness among citizens in terms of energy and climate indicators
and to initiate debate for better energy and climate-related services.
As energy transition is capital intensive, effective cooperation, mutual learning, and sharing
of capital risks both by the central and state governments can drive the agenda of clean
energy transition. Though care has been taken to ensure a fair and comprehensive selection
of parameters for ranking the states, some parameters such as reliability of electricity in rural
and urban areas, SAIFI and SAIDI, CBG penetration, bio-fuel consumption, energy storage
capacity and green hydrogen production could not be selected for final computation,
due to lack of reliable data. In addition, the time lag for many state-level energy data
varies from two to three-year. Also, the financial data of DISCOMs come with a lag of two
years due to long time taken for auditing financial data. The SECI report also highlight
a list of states where data for a few indicators are not available. This has also affected
the overall ranking of the states. Data updation and validation need to be a priority of
state governments going forward to help them design better policies. The best practices
of the states should be regularly documented and disseminated through mediums such
as SECI to promote peer-to-peer learning. For instance, each state can learn from the
best performing states/UTs. Eventually, healthy competition between states will enable the
states to put an effort for enhanced levels of affordability, security, and sustainability for
energy needs. SECI provides us an opportunity to work closely on strengthening energy
systems and energy data management which is the crux of every planning process and
development. The SECI is a work in progress and continuous refinements will be made
as additional data are made available. 8
ANNEXURE Annexure
52State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
ANNEXURE 1: STATE-WISE PERFORMANCE ACROSS INDICATORS
ANDHRA PRADESH
SECI Score: 41.6
Overall Rank: 18
Category: Larger States
Category Rank: 12
PARAMETER-WISE & INDICATOR-WISE SCORE
S.No.Indicator NameScores
Parameter 1: DISCOM’s Performance (65.1)
1.1Debt Equity Ratio0.0
1.2AT&C Losses87.8
1.3T&D Losses67.2
1.4ACS – ARR gap90.4
1.5Implementation of ToD/ToU tariff for Consumers100
1.6States Implemented DBT Transfer0.0
1.7Open Access Surcharge53.1
1.8Regulatory Assets100
1.9Complexity of Tariff67.7
Parameter 2: Access, affordability & reliability (42.6)
2.1Per capita energy consumption9.9
2.2Hours of Electricity Supplied (Industry)100
2.3Hours of Electricity Supplied (Agri)5.6
2.4Cross-Subsidization38.2
2.5Life-line electricity and tariff83.5
Parameter 3: Clean Energy Initiatives (16.9)
3.1Clean Cooking Fuel Supply33.1
3.2Renewable Energy Penetration17.7
3.3CNG Vehicle PenetrationNull
Parameter 4: Energy Efficiency (40)
4.1Energy Intensity of GSDP9.9
4.2Energy savings in Commercial & Public Buildings50.0
4.3Industrial energy Savings60.0
Parameter 5: Environmental Sustainability (35.0)
5.1Emission Intensity of GSDP83.8
5.2Utilization of RE potential1.8
5.3Percentage change in forest cover w.r.t 200514.7
5.4Forest carbon stock11.1
Parameter 6: New Initiatives (0.0)
6.1EV penetrationNull
6.2Availability of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Mobility Null
6.3Proportion of consumers with Smart meters0.0
ACHIEVER Annexure
53State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
ASSAM
SECI Score: 42.6
Overall Rank: 16
Category: Larger States
Category Rank: 10
PARAMETER-WISE & INDICATOR-WISE SCORE
S.No.Indicator NameScores
Parameter 1: DISCOM’s Performance (67.3)
1.1Debt Equity Ratio95.9
1.2AT&C Losses65.5
1.3T&D Losses42.7
1.4ACS – ARR gap91.6
1.5Implementation of ToD/ToU tariff for Consumers33.3
1.6States Implemented DBT Transfer0.0
1.7Open Access Surcharge47.0
1.8Regulatory Assets100
1.9Complexity of Tariff93.9
Parameter 2: Access, affordability & reliability (38.3)
2.1Per capita energy consumption1.6
2.2Hours of Electricity Supplied (Industry)Null
2.3Hours of Electricity Supplied (Agri)Null
2.4Cross-Subsidization95.8
2.5Life-line electricity and tariff29.9
Parameter 3: Clean Energy Initiatives (4.3)
3.1Clean Cooking Fuel Supply12.6
3.2Renewable Energy Penetration0.2
3.3CNG Vehicle Penetration3.9
Parameter 4: Energy Efficiency (39)
4.1Energy Intensity of GSDP77.0
4.2Energy savings in Commercial & Public Buildings0.0
4.3Industrial energy Savings40.0
Parameter 5: Environmental Sustainability (39.9)
5.1Emission Intensity of GSDP96.3
5.2Utilization of RE potential0.1
5.3Percentage change in forest cover w.r.t 20058.4
5.4Forest carbon stock29.8
Parameter 6: New Initiatives (17.6)
6.1EV penetration49.2
6.2Availability of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Mobility0.1
6.3Proportion of consumers with Smart meters3.6
ACHIEVER Annexure
54State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
BIHAR
SECI Score: 38.3
Overall Rank: 21
Category: Larger States
Category Rank: 15
PARAMETER-WISE & INDICATOR-WISE SCORE
S.No.Indicator NameScores
Parameter 1: DISCOM’s Performance (61.3)
1.1Debt Equity Ratio95.6
1.2AT&C Losses35.4
1.3T&D Losses35.7
1.4ACS – ARR gap86.7
1.5Implementation of ToD/ToU tariff for Consumers66.7
1.6States Implemented DBT Transfer0.0
1.7Open Access Surcharge39.3
1.8Regulatory Assets100
1.9Complexity of Tariff91.8
Parameter 2: Access, affordability & reliability (45.0)
2.1Per capita energy consumption0.0
2.2Hours of Electricity Supplied (Industry)100
2.3Hours of Electricity Supplied (Agri)66.7
2.4Cross-Subsidization74.0
2.5Life-line electricity and tariff18.5
Parameter 3: Clean Energy Initiatives (4.9)
3.1Clean Cooking Fuel Supply9.8
3.2Renewable Energy Penetration0.9
3.3CNG Vehicle Penetration3.9
Parameter 4: Energy Efficiency (22.8)
4.1Energy Intensity of GSDP48.3
4.2Energy savings in Commercial & Public Buildings0.0
4.3Industrial energy Savings20.0
Parameter 5: Environmental Sustainability (33.7)
5.1Emission Intensity of GSDP82.7
5.2Utilization of RE potential0.5
5.3Percentage change in forest cover w.r.t 200512.5
5.4Forest carbon stock11.4
Parameter 6: New Initiatives (7.6)
6.1EV penetration20.3
6.2Availability of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Mobility 0.0
6.3Proportion of consumers with Smart meters2.3
ACHIEVER Annexure
55State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
CHHATTISGARH
SECI Score: 31.7
Overall Rank: 29
Category: Larger States
Category Rank: 20
PARAMETER-WISE & INDICATOR-WISE SCORE
S.No.Indicator NameScores
Parameter 1: DISCOM’s Performance (58.4)
1.1Debt Equity Ratio0.0
1.2AT&C Losses65.1
1.3T&D Losses47.5
1.4ACS – ARR gap90.1
1.5Implementation of ToD/ToU tariff for Consumers66.7
1.6States Implemented DBT Transfer0.0
1.7Open Access Surcharge30.1
1.8Regulatory Assets100
1.9Complexity of Tariff98.9
Parameter 2: Access, affordability & reliability (45.4)
2.1Per capita energy consumption15.3
2.2Hours of Electricity Supplied (Industry)100
2.3Hours of Electricity Supplied (Agri)66.7
2.4Cross-Subsidization36.6
2.5Life-line electricity and tariff62.2
Parameter 3: Clean Energy Initiatives (2.1)
3.1Clean Cooking Fuel Supply5.5
3.2Renewable Energy Penetration0.8
3.3CNG Vehicle Penetration0.0
Parameter 4: Energy Efficiency (0.0)
4.1Energy Intensity of GSDP0.0
4.2Energy savings in Commercial & Public Buildings0.0
4.3Industrial energy Savings0.0
Parameter 5: Environmental Sustainability (5.8)
5.1Emission Intensity of GSDP97.1
5.2Utilization of RE potential100
5.3Percentage change in forest cover w.r.t 200530.0
5.4Forest carbon stock21.1
Parameter 6: New Initiatives (4.2)
6.1EV penetration11.9
6.2Availability of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Mobility 0.6
6.3Proportion of consumers with Smart meters0.0
ASPIRANT Annexure
56State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
GUJARAT
SECI Score: 50.1
Overall Rank: 5
Category: Larger States
Category Rank: 1
PARAMETER-WISE & INDICATOR-WISE SCORE
S.No.Indicator NameScores
Parameter 1: DISCOM’s Performance (72.7)
1.1Debt Equity Ratio99.5
1.2AT&C Losses85.6
1.3T&D Losses56.9
1.4ACS – ARR gap91.2
1.5Implementation of ToD/ToU tariff for Consumers66.7
1.6States Implemented DBT Transfer0.0
1.7Open Access Surcharge49.5
1.8Regulatory Assets100
1.9Complexity of Tariff57.0
Parameter 2: Access, affordability & reliability (52.4)
2.1Per capita energy consumption25.7
2.2Hours of Electricity Supplied (Industry)100
2.3Hours of Electricity Supplied (Agri)11.4
2.4Cross-Subsidization67.9
2.5Life-line electricity and tariff58.7
Parameter 3: Clean Energy Initiatives (39.2)
3.1Clean Cooking Fuel Supply32.4
3.2Renewable Energy Penetration13.7
3.3CNG Vehicle Penetration71.3
Parameter 4: Energy Efficiency (40.1)
4.1Energy Intensity of GSDP40.3
4.2Energy savings in Commercial & Public Buildings0.0
4.3Industrial energy Savings80.0
Parameter 5: Environmental Sustainability (35.1)
5.1Emission Intensity of GSDP92.3
5.2Utilization of RE potential1.5
5.3Percentage change in forest cover w.r.t 20058.1
5.4Forest carbon stock8.3
Parameter 6: New Initiatives (5.5)
6.1EV penetration10.2
6.2Availability of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Mobility 4.5
6.3Proportion of consumers with Smart meters1.8
FRONT-
RUNNER Annexure
57State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
HARYANA
SECI Score: 47.9
Overall Rank: 9
Category: Larger States
Category Rank: 4
PARAMETER-WISE & INDICATOR-WISE SCORE
S.No.Indicator NameScores
Parameter 1: DISCOM’s Performance 69.8
1.1Debt Equity Ratio27.7
1.2AT&C Losses74.7
1.3T&D Losses54.7
1.4ACS – ARR gap91.2
1.5Implementation of ToD/ToU tariff for Consumers100
1.6States Implemented DBT Transfer0.0
1.7Open Access Surcharge79.6
1.8Regulatory Assets100
1.9Complexity of Tariff90.0
Parameter 2: Access, affordability & reliability (53.6)
2.1Per capita energy consumption27.2
2.2Hours of Electricity Supplied (Industry)100
2.3Hours of Electricity Supplied (Agri)12.8
2.4Cross-Subsidization68.0
2.5Life-line electricity and tariff61.9
Parameter 3: Clean Energy Initiatives (42.9)
3.1Clean Cooking Fuel Supply55.1
3.2Renewable Energy Penetration3.9
3.3CNG Vehicle Penetration69.8
Parameter 4: Energy Efficiency (11.7)
4.1Energy Intensity of GSDP35.0
4.2Energy savings in Commercial & Public Buildings0.0
4.3Industrial energy Savings0.0
Parameter 5: Environmental Sustainability (33.4)
5.1Emission Intensity of GSDP91.4
5.2Utilization of RE potential1.9
5.3Percentage change in forest cover w.r.t 20056.7
5.4Forest carbon stock1.9
Parameter 6: New Initiatives (6.9)
6.1EV penetration20.3
6.2Availability of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Mobility 0.2
6.3Proportion of consumers with Smart meters0.0
FRONT-
RUNNER Annexure
58State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
HIMACHAL PRADESH
SECI Score: 45.4
Overall Rank: 12
Category: Larger States
Category Rank: 7
PARAMETER-WISE & INDICATOR-WISE SCORE
S.No.Indicator NameScores
Parameter 1: DISCOM’s Performance (57.0)
1.1Debt Equity Ratio0.0
1.2AT&C Losses86.2
1.3T&D Losses73.1
1.4ACS – ARR gap91.1
1.5Implementation of ToD/ToU tariff for Consumers0.0
1.6States Implemented DBT Transfer0.0
1.7Open Access Surcharge17.7
1.8Regulatory Assets100
1.9Complexity of Tariff90.0
Parameter 2: Access, affordability & reliability (56.3)
2.1Per capita energy consumption16.1
2.2Hours of Electricity Supplied (Industry)100
2.3Hours of Electricity Supplied (Agri)100
2.4Cross-Subsidization67.8
2.5Life-line electricity and tariff47.3
Parameter 3: Clean Energy Initiatives (14.3)
3.1Clean Cooking Fuel Supply37.8
3.2Renewable Energy Penetration5.0
3.3CNG Vehicle Penetration0.1
Parameter 4: Energy Efficiency (20.1)
4.1Energy Intensity of GSDP60.3
4.2Energy savings in Commercial & Public Buildings0.0
4.3Industrial energy Savings0.0
Parameter 5: Environmental Sustainability (52.1)
5.1Emission Intensity of GSDP98.7
5.2Utilization of RE potential0.6
5.3Percentage change in forest cover w.r.t 200510.9
5.4Forest carbon stock93.0
Parameter 6: New Initiatives (38.1)
6.1EV penetration13.6
6.2Availability of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Mobility 100
6.3Proportion of consumers with Smart meters0.8
ACHIEVER Annexure
59State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
JHARKHAND
SECI Score: 35.2
Overall Rank: 26
Category: Larger States
Category Rank: 18
PARAMETER-WISE & INDICATOR-WISE SCORE
S.No.Indicator NameScores
Parameter 1: DISCOM’s Performance (58.3)
1.1Debt Equity Ratio45.3
1.2AT&C Losses41.5
1.3T&D Losses67.8
1.4ACS – ARR gap84.7
1.5Implementation of ToD/ToU tariff for Consumers0.0
1.6States Implemented DBT Transfer0.0
1.7Open Access Surcharge59.1
1.8Regulatory Assets100
1.9Complexity of Tariff95.7
Parameter 2: Access, affordability & reliability (46.5)
2.1Per capita energy consumption6.3
2.2Hours of Electricity Supplied (Industry)100
2.3Hours of Electricity Supplied (Agri)77.8
2.4Cross-Subsidization68.0
2.5Life-line electricity and tariff22.0
Parameter 3: Clean Energy Initiatives (2.9)
3.1Clean Cooking Fuel Supply5.5
3.2Renewable Energy Penetration0.0
3.3CNG Vehicle Penetration33.7
Parameter 4: Energy Efficiency (17.2)
4.1Energy Intensity of GSDP31.7
4.2Energy savings in Commercial & Public Buildings0.0
4.3Industrial energy Savings20.0
Parameter 5: Environmental Sustainability (19.0)
5.1Emission Intensity of GSDP41.7
5.2Utilization of RE potential0.03
5.3Percentage change in forest cover w.r.t 20059.9
5.4Forest carbon stock11.2
Parameter 6: New Initiatives (9.3)
6.1EV penetration11.9
6.2Availability of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Mobility 16.1
6.3Proportion of consumers with Smart meters0.0
ASPIRANT Annexure
60State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
KARNATAKA
SECI Score: 43.8
Overall Rank: 14
Category: Larger States
Category Rank: 8
PARAMETER-WISE & INDICATOR-WISE SCORE
S.No.Indicator NameScores
Parameter 1: DISCOM’s Performance (56.8)
1.1Debt Equity Ratio0.0
1.2AT&C Losses76.0
1.3T&D Losses66.7
1.4ACS – ARR gap89.2
1.5Implementation of ToD/ToU tariff for Consumers66.7
1.6States Implemented DBT Transfer0.0
1.7Open Access Surcharge33.9
1.8Regulatory Assets69.7
1.9Complexity of Tariff78.5
Parameter 2: Access, affordability & reliability (45.5)
2.1Per capita energy consumption17.0
2.2Hours of Electricity Supplied (Industry)100
2.3Hours of Electricity Supplied (Agri)1.7
2.4Cross-Subsidization69.6
2.5Life-line electricity and tariff38.1
Parameter 3: Clean Energy Initiatives (27)
3.1Clean Cooking Fuel Supply43.6
3.2Renewable Energy Penetration36.2
3.3CNG Vehicle Penetration1.2
Parameter 4: Energy Efficiency (57.2)
4.1Energy Intensity of GSDP61.6
4.2Energy savings in Commercial & Public Buildings50.0
4.3Industrial energy Savings60.0
Parameter 5: Environmental Sustainability (41.7)
5.1Emission Intensity of GSDP95.3
5.2Utilization of RE potential2.5
5.3Percentage change in forest cover w.r.t 200512.0
5.4Forest carbon stock33.3
Parameter 6: New Initiatives (14.5)
6.1EV penetration18.6
6.2Availability of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Mobility 23.5
6.3Proportion of consumers with Smart meters1.2
ACHIEVER Annexure
61State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
KERALA
SECI Score: 49.1
Overall Rank: 6
Category: Larger States
Category Rank: 2
PARAMETER-WISE & INDICATOR-WISE SCORE
S.No.Indicator NameScores
Parameter 1: DISCOM’s Performance (64.4)
1.1Debt Equity Ratio0.0
1.2AT&C Losses81.2
1.3T&D Losses72.2
1.4ACS – ARR gap90.5
1.5Implementation of ToD/ToU tariff for Consumers100
1.6States Implemented DBT Transfer0.0
1.7Open Access Surcharge46.1
1.8Regulatory Assets100
1.9Complexity of Tariff77.4
Parameter 2: Access, affordability & reliability (67.3)
2.1Per capita energy consumption11.1
2.2Hours of Electricity Supplied (Industry)100
2.3Hours of Electricity Supplied (Agri)100
2.4Cross-Subsidization100
2.5Life-line electricity and tariff55.0
Parameter 3: Clean Energy Initiatives (21.5)
3.1Clean Cooking Fuel Supply48.1
3.2Renewable Energy Penetration12.1
3.3CNG Vehicle Penetration4.4
Parameter 4: Energy Efficiency (58)
4.1Energy Intensity of GSDP74.1
4.2Energy savings in Commercial & Public Buildings0.0
4.3Industrial energy Savings100
Parameter 5: Environmental Sustainability (46.9)
5.1Emission Intensity of GSDP98.6
5.2Utilization of RE potential1.03
5.3Percentage change in forest cover w.r.t 200524.3
5.4Forest carbon stock34.4
Parameter 6: New Initiatives (7.7)
6.1EV penetration18.6
6.2Availability of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Mobility 4.4
6.3Proportion of consumers with Smart meters0.1
FRONT-
RUNNER Annexure
62State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
RAJASTHAN
SECI Score: 35.4
Overall Rank: 25
Category: Larger States
Category Rank: 17
PARAMETER-WISE & INDICATOR-WISE SCORE
S.No.Indicator NameScores
Parameter 1: DISCOM’s Performance (49.2)
1.1Debt Equity Ratio0.0
1.2AT&C Losses54.3
1.3T&D Losses50.9
1.4ACS – ARR gap84.1
1.5Implementation of ToD/ToU tariff for Consumers66.7
1.6States Implemented DBT Transfer0.0
1.7Open Access SurchargeNull
1.8Regulatory Assets100
1.9Complexity of Tariff92.1
Parameter 2: Access, affordability & reliability (42.9)
2.1Per capita energy consumption11.5
2.2Hours of Electricity Supplied (Industry)100
2.3Hours of Electricity Supplied (Agri)1.7
2.4Cross-Subsidization89.1
2.5Life-line electricity and tariff0.0
Parameter 3: Clean Energy Initiatives (15.5)
3.1Clean Cooking Fuel Supply24.7
3.2Renewable Energy Penetration19.5
3.3CNG Vehicle Penetration2.2
Parameter 4: Energy Efficiency (44)
4.1Energy Intensity of GSDP22.1
4.2Energy savings in Commercial & Public Buildings50.0
4.3Industrial energy Savings60.0
Parameter 5: Environmental Sustainability (31.4)
5.1Emission Intensity of GSDP83.1
5.2Utilization of RE potential0.9
5.3Percentage change in forest cover w.r.t 20059.8
5.4Forest carbon stock1.7
Parameter 6: New Initiatives (4.8)
6.1EV penetration11.9
6.2Availability of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Mobility 0.0
6.3Proportion of consumers with Smart meters2.5
ASPIRANT Annexure
63State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
MADHYA PRADESH
SECI Score: 32.6
Overall Rank: 28
Category: Larger States
Category Rank: 19
PARAMETER-WISE & INDICATOR-WISE SCORE
S.No.Indicator NameScores
Parameter 1: DISCOM’s Performance (53.7)
1.1Debt Equity Ratio0.0
1.2AT&C Losses53.2
1.3T&D Losses44.1
1.4ACS – ARR gap87.3
1.5Implementation of ToD/ToU tariff for Consumers100
1.6States Implemented DBT Transfer0.0
1.7Open Access Surcharge43.4
1.8Regulatory Assets100
1.9Complexity of Tariff59.1
Parameter 2: Access, affordability & reliability (42.7)
2.1Per capita energy consumption7.6
2.2Hours of Electricity Supplied (Industry)100
2.3Hours of Electricity Supplied (Agri)61.1
2.4Cross-Subsidization54.2
2.5Life-line electricity and tariff32.6
Parameter 3: Clean Energy Initiatives (6.2)
3.1Clean Cooking Fuel Supply12.7
3.2Renewable Energy Penetration6.0
3.3CNG Vehicle Penetration0.0
Parameter 4: Energy Efficiency (8.3)
4.1Energy Intensity of GSDP24.8
4.2Energy savings in Commercial & Public Buildings0.0
4.3Industrial energy Savings0.0
Parameter 5: Environmental Sustainability (24.1)
5.1Emission Intensity of GSDP59.1
5.2Utilization of RE potential1.6
5.3Percentage change in forest cover w.r.t 20056.5
5.4Forest carbon stock11.7
Parameter 6: New Initiatives (3.3)
6.1EV penetrationNull
6.2Availability of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Mobility Null
6.3Proportion of consumers with Smart meters10.0
ASPIRANT Annexure
64State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
MAHARASHTRA
SECI Score: 46
Overall Rank: 11
Category: Larger States
Category Rank: 6
PARAMETER-WISE & INDICATOR-WISE SCORE
S.No.Indicator NameScores
Parameter 1: DISCOM’s Performance (57.7)
1.1Debt Equity Ratio81.0
1.2AT&C Losses71.6
1.3T&D Losses57.7
1.4ACS – ARR gap88.5
1.5Implementation of ToD/ToU tariff for Consumers66.7
1.6States Implemented DBT Transfer0.0
1.7Open Access Surcharge24.1
1.8Regulatory Assets25.8
1.9Complexity of Tariff43.7
Parameter 2: Access, affordability & reliability (51.2)
2.1Per capita energy consumption14.6
2.2Hours of Electricity Supplied (Industry)100
2.3Hours of Electricity Supplied (Agri)16.7
2.4Cross-Subsidization88.8
2.5Life-line electricity and tariff30.2
Parameter 3: Clean Energy Initiatives (34.0)
3.1Clean Cooking Fuel Supply43.6
3.2Renewable Energy Penetration9.5
3.3CNG Vehicle Penetration48.8
Parameter 4: Energy Efficiency (75.7)
4.1Energy Intensity of GSDP67.0
4.2Energy savings in Commercial & Public Buildings100
4.3Industrial energy Savings60.0
Parameter 5: Environmental Sustainability (36.2)
5.1Emission Intensity of GSDP90.1
5.2Utilization of RE potential1.4
5.3Percentage change in forest cover w.r.t 20057.0
5.4Forest carbon stock21.8
Parameter 6: New Initiatives (10.4)
6.1EV penetration17.0
6.2Availability of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Mobility 14.3
6.3Proportion of consumers with Smart meters0.0
FRONT-
RUNNER Annexure
65State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
ODISHA
SECI Score: 37.1
Overall Rank: 22
Category: Larger States
Category Rank: 16
PARAMETER-WISE & INDICATOR-WISE SCORE
S.No.Indicator NameScores
Parameter 1: DISCOM’s Performance (59.0)
1.1Debt Equity Ratio0.0
1.2AT&C Losses55.6
1.3T&D Losses60.9
1.4ACS – ARR gap89.4
1.5Implementation of ToD/ToU tariff for Consumers66.7
1.6States Implemented DBT Transfer0.0
1.7Open Access Surcharge0.0
1.8Regulatory Assets100
1.9Complexity of Tariff96.1
Parameter 2: Access, affordability & reliability (57.4)
2.1Per capita energy consumption12.0
2.2Hours of Electricity Supplied (Industry)100
2.3Hours of Electricity Supplied (Agri)100
2.4Cross-Subsidization57.1
2.5Life-line electricity and tariff75.7
Parameter 3: Clean Energy Initiatives (4.8)
3.1Clean Cooking Fuel Supply9.2
3.2Renewable Energy Penetration1.5
3.3CNG Vehicle Penetration3.8
Parameter 4: Energy Efficiency (21.8)
4.1Energy Intensity of GSDP25.3
4.2Energy savings in Commercial & Public Buildings0.0
4.3Industrial energy Savings40.0
Parameter 5: Environmental Sustainability (22.6)
5.1Emission Intensity of GSDP46.8
5.2Utilization of RE potential0.4
5.3Percentage change in forest cover w.r.t 200511.4
5.4Forest carbon stock19.0
Parameter 6: New Initiatives (0.9)
6.1EV penetration2.0
6.2Availability of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Mobility Null
6.3Proportion of consumers with Smart meters0.6
ACHIEVER Annexure
66State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
PUNJAB
SECI Score: 48.6
Overall Rank: 7
Category: Larger States
Category Rank: 3
PARAMETER-WISE & INDICATOR-WISE SCORE
S.No.Indicator NameScores
Parameter 1: DISCOM’s Performance (77.1)
1.1Debt Equity Ratio89.7
1.2AT&C Losses81.4
1.3T&D Losses69.5
1.4ACS – ARR gap90.1
1.5Implementation of ToD/ToU tariff for Consumers66.7
1.6States Implemented DBT Transfer0.0
1.7Open Access Surcharge77.2
1.8Regulatory Assets100
1.9Complexity of Tariff77.8
Parameter 2: Access, affordability & reliability (46.8)
2.1Per capita energy consumption22.2
2.2Hours of Electricity Supplied (Industry)100
2.3Hours of Electricity Supplied (Agri)0.0
2.4Cross-Subsidization74.1
2.5Life-line electricity and tariff30.6
Parameter 3: Clean Energy Initiatives (26.1)
3.1Clean Cooking Fuel Supply57.8
3.2Renewable Energy Penetration9.4
3.3CNG Vehicle Penetration11.2
Parameter 4: Energy Efficiency (35.1)
4.1Energy Intensity of GSDP15.2
4.2Energy savings in Commercial & Public Buildings50.0
4.3Industrial energy Savings40.0
Parameter 5: Environmental Sustainability (37.0)
5.1Emission Intensity of GSDP88.6
5.2Utilization of RE potential5.0
5.3Percentage change in forest cover w.r.t 200515.7
5.4Forest carbon stock8.2
Parameter 6: New Initiatives (2.3)
6.1EV penetration6.8
6.2Availability of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Mobility 0.0
6.3Proportion of consumers with Smart meters0.0
FRONT-
RUNNER Annexure
67State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
TAMIL NADU
SECI Score: 43.4
Overall Rank: 15
Category: Larger States
Category Rank: 9
PARAMETER-WISE & INDICATOR-WISE SCORE
S.No.Indicator NameScores
Parameter 1: DISCOM’s Performance (57.3)
1.1Debt Equity Ratio0.0
1.2AT&C Losses80.3
1.3T&D Losses66.3
1.4ACS – ARR gap81.2
1.5Implementation of ToD/ToU tariff for Consumers33.3
1.6States Implemented DBT Transfer0.0
1.7Open Access Surcharge34.2
1.8Regulatory Assets100
1.9Complexity of Tariff91.0
Parameter 2: Access, affordability & reliability (46.3)
2.1Per capita energy consumption19.1
2.2Hours of Electricity Supplied (Industry)100
2.3Hours of Electricity Supplied (Agri)16.7
2.4Cross-Subsidization28.7
2.5Life-line electricity and tariff100
Parameter 3: Clean Energy Initiatives (21.7)
3.1Clean Cooking Fuel Supply46.4
3.2Renewable Energy Penetration18.8
3.3CNG Vehicle Penetration0.0
Parameter 4: Energy Efficiency (85.4)
4.1Energy Intensity of GSDP56.1
4.2Energy savings in Commercial & Public Buildings100
4.3Industrial energy Savings100
Parameter 5: Environmental Sustainability (39.2)
5.1Emission Intensity of GSDP89.7
5.2Utilization of RE potential4.0
5.3Percentage change in forest cover w.r.t 200517.1
5.4Forest carbon stock17.6
Parameter 6: New Initiatives (4.0)
6.1EV penetration11.9
6.2Availability of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Mobility 0.0
6.3Proportion of consumers with Smart meters0.0
ACHIEVER Annexure
68State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
TELANGANA
SECI Score: 41.9
Overall Rank: 17
Category: Larger States
Category Rank: 11
PARAMETER-WISE & INDICATOR-WISE SCORE
S.No.Indicator NameScores
Parameter 1: DISCOM’s Performance 55.1
1.1Debt Equity Ratio0.0
1.2AT&C Losses68.7
1.3T&D Losses71.0
1.4ACS – ARR gap86.1
1.5Implementation of ToD/ToU tariff for Consumers66.7
1.6States Implemented DBT Transfer0.0
1.7Open Access Surcharge13.9
1.8Regulatory Assets100
1.9Complexity of Tariff76.3
Parameter 2: Access, affordability & reliability (60.4)
2.1Per capita energy consumption22.5
2.2Hours of Electricity Supplied (Industry)100
2.3Hours of Electricity Supplied (Agri)100
2.4Cross-Subsidization55.5
2.5Life-line electricity and tariff79.4
Parameter 3: Clean Energy Initiatives (18.0)
3.1Clean Cooking Fuel Supply42.6
3.2Renewable Energy Penetration11.5
3.3CNG Vehicle Penetration0.0
Parameter 4: Energy Efficiency (64.7)
4.1Energy Intensity of GSDP54.2
4.2Energy savings in Commercial & Public Buildings100
4.3Industrial energy Savings40
Parameter 5: Environmental Sustainability (34.6)
5.1Emission Intensity of GSDP83.5
5.2Utilization of RE potential2.2
5.3Percentage change in forest cover w.r.t 200514.3
5.4Forest carbon stock9.7
Parameter 6: New Initiatives (0.4)
6.1EV penetrationNull
6.2Availability of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Mobility Null
6.3Proportion of consumers with Smart meters1.2
ACHIEVER Annexure
69State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
UTTAR PRADESH
SECI Score: 41.0
Overall Rank: 19
Category: Larger States
Category Rank: 13
PARAMETER-WISE & INDICATOR-WISE SCORE
S.No.Indicator NameScores
Parameter 1: DISCOM’s Performance (59.9)
1.1Debt Equity Ratio54.9
1.2AT&C Losses53.7
1.3T&D Losses55.0
1.4ACS – ARR gap89.0
1.5Implementation of ToD/ToU tariff for Consumers33.3
1.6States Implemented DBT Transfer0.0
1.7Open Access Surcharge46.7
1.8Regulatory Assets99.1
1.9Complexity of Tariff77.8
Parameter 2: Access, affordability & reliability (37.8)
2.1Per capita energy consumption4.5
2.2Hours of Electricity Supplied (Industry)100
2.3Hours of Electricity Supplied (Agri)97.7
2.4Cross-Subsidization56.0
2.5Life-line electricity and tariff65.2
Parameter 3: Clean Energy Initiatives (12.6)
3.1Clean Cooking Fuel Supply19.5
3.2Renewable Energy Penetration3.9
3.3CNG Vehicle Penetration14.5
Parameter 4: Energy Efficiency (42)
4.1Energy Intensity of GSDP16.0
4.2Energy savings in Commercial & Public Buildings50.0
4.3Industrial energy Savings60.0
Parameter 5: Environmental Sustainability (30.9)
5.1Emission Intensity of GSDP75.0
5.2Utilization of RE potential3.1
5.3Percentage change in forest cover w.r.t 20059.3
5.4Forest carbon stock13.8
Parameter 6: New Initiatives (27.4)
6.1EV penetration30.5
6.2Availability of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Mobility Null
6.3Proportion of consumers with Smart meters51.7
ACHIEVER Annexure
70State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
UTTARAKHAND
SECI Score: 46.5
Overall Rank: 10
Category: Larger States
Category Rank: 5
PARAMETER-WISE & INDICATOR-WISE SCORE
S.No.Indicator NameScores
Parameter 1: DISCOM’s Performance (61.9)
1.1Debt Equity Ratio0.0
1.2AT&C Losses70.8
1.3T&D Losses60.3
1.4ACS – ARR gap90.0
1.5Implementation of ToD/ToU tariff for Consumers33.3
1.6States Implemented DBT Transfer0.0
1.7Open Access Surcharge77.8
1.8Regulatory Assets100
1.9Complexity of Tariff91.8
Parameter 2: Access, affordability & reliability (55.3)
2.1Per capita energy consumption14.4
2.2Hours of Electricity Supplied (Industry)100
2.3Hours of Electricity Supplied (Agri)79.3
2.4Cross-Subsidization35.0
2.5Life-line electricity and tariff35.2
Parameter 3: Clean Energy Initiatives (18.5)
3.1Clean Cooking Fuel Supply47.1
3.2Renewable Energy Penetration6.7
3.3CNG Vehicle Penetration1.7
Parameter 4: Energy Efficiency (50.5)
4.1Energy Intensity of GSDP71.4
4.2Energy savings in Commercial & Public Buildings0.0
4.3Industrial energy Savings80.0
Parameter 5: Environmental Sustainability (48.7)
5.1Emission Intensity of GSDP98.1
5.2Utilization of RE potential0.8
5.3Percentage change in forest cover w.r.t 20056.2
5.4Forest carbon stock82.9
Parameter 6: New Initiatives (14.7)
6.1EV penetration44.1
6.2Availability of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Mobility 0.04
6.3Proportion of consumers with Smart meters0.0
FRONT-
RUNNER Annexure
71State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
WEST BENGAL
SECI Score: 38.9
Overall Rank: 20
Category: Larger States
Category Rank: 14
PARAMETER-WISE & INDICATOR-WISE SCORE
S.No.Indicator NameScores
Parameter 1: DISCOM’s Performance (55.3)
1.1Debt Equity Ratio87.7
1.2AT&C Losses70.8
1.3T&D Losses68.7
1.4ACS – ARR gap89.0
1.5Implementation of ToD/ToU tariff for Consumers100
1.6States Implemented DBT Transfer0.0
1.7Open Access SurchargeNull
1.8Regulatory Assets20.5
1.9Complexity of Tariff0.0
Parameter 2: Access, affordability & reliability (52)
2.1Per capita energy consumption4.5
2.2Hours of Electricity Supplied (Industry)100
2.3Hours of Electricity Supplied (Agri)94.4
2.4Cross-Subsidization77.4
2.5Life-line electricity and tariff27.9
Parameter 3: Clean Energy Initiatives (8.5)
3.1Clean Cooking Fuel Supply23.2
3.2Renewable Energy Penetration1.9
3.3CNG Vehicle Penetration0.4
Parameter 4: Energy Efficiency (27.7)
4.1Energy Intensity of GSDP63.0
4.2Energy savings in Commercial & Public Buildings0.0
4.3Industrial energy Savings20.0
Parameter 5: Environmental Sustainability (40.9)
5.1Emission Intensity of GSDP80.0
5.2Utilization of RE potential1.6
5.3Percentage change in forest cover w.r.t 200530.6
5.4Forest carbon stock22.4
Parameter 6: New Initiatives (9)
6.1EV penetration25.4
6.2Availability of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Mobility 0.6
6.3Proportion of consumers with Smart meters0.9
ACHIEVER Annexure
72State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
ARUNACHAL PRADESH
SECI Score: 27
Overall Rank: 34
Category: Smaller States
Category Rank: 8
PARAMETER-WISE & INDICATOR-WISE SCORE
S.No.Indicator NameScores
Parameter 1: DISCOM’s Performance (31.1)
1.1Debt Equity Ratio0.0
1.2AT&C Losses26.0
1.3T&D Losses0.0
1.4ACS – ARR gap68.1
1.5Implementation of ToD/ToU tariff for Consumers0.0
1.6States Implemented DBT Transfer0.0
1.7Open Access Surcharge0.0
1.8Regulatory Assets100
1.9Complexity of Tariff95.3
Parameter 2: Access, affordability & reliability (43.2)
2.1Per capita energy consumption11.7
2.2Hours of Electricity Supplied (Industry)Null
2.3Hours of Electricity Supplied (Agri)Null
2.4Cross-Subsidization85.6
2.5Life-line electricity and tariff57.9
Parameter 3: Clean Energy Initiatives (5.8)
3.1Clean Cooking Fuel Supply17.1
3.2Renewable Energy Penetration0.03
3.3CNG Vehicle Penetration0.2
Parameter 4: Energy Efficiency (19.8)
4.1Energy Intensity of GSDP59.3
4.2Energy savings in Commercial & Public Buildings0.0
4.3Industrial energy Savings0.0
Parameter 5: Environmental Sustainability (49.0)
5.1Emission Intensity of GSDP97.1
5.2Utilization of RE potential0.3
5.3Percentage change in forest cover w.r.t 20055.9
5.4Forest carbon stock87.6
Parameter 6: New Initiatives (1.1)
6.1EV penetration3.4
6.2Availability of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Mobility Null
6.3Proportion of consumers with Smart meters0.0
ASPIRANT Annexure
73State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
GOA
SECI Score: 51.4
Overall Rank: 4
Category: Smaller States
Category Rank: 1
PARAMETER-WISE & INDICATOR-WISE SCORE
S.No.Indicator NameScores
Parameter 1: DISCOM’s Performance (63.4)
1.1Debt Equity RatioNull
1.2AT&C Losses82.2
1.3T&D Losses80.7
1.4ACS – ARR gap88.2
1.5Implementation of ToD/ToU tariff for Consumers66.7
1.6States Implemented DBT Transfer0.0
1.7Open Access Surcharge39.0
1.8Regulatory Assets100
1.9Complexity of Tariff92.8
Parameter 2: Access, affordability & reliability (59.6)
2.1Per capita energy consumption31.4
2.2Hours of Electricity Supplied (Industry)100
2.3Hours of Electricity Supplied (Agri)100
2.4Cross-Subsidization41.8
2.5Life-line electricity and tariff86.6
Parameter 3: Clean Energy Initiatives (62.4)
3.1Clean Cooking Fuel Supply87.0
3.2Renewable Energy Penetration100
3.3CNG Vehicle Penetration0.03
Parameter 4: Energy Efficiency (16.6)
4.1Energy Intensity of GSDP50.0
4.2Energy savings in Commercial & Public Buildings0.0
4.3Industrial energy Savings0.0
Parameter 5: Environmental Sustainability (43.7)
5.1Emission Intensity of GSDP98.0
5.2Utilization of RE potential0.1
5.3Percentage change in forest cover w.r.t 20059.7
5.4Forest carbon stock46.3
Parameter 6: New Initiatives (12.4)
6.1EV penetration37.2
6.2Availability of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Mobility 0.0
6.3Proportion of consumers with Smart meters0.0
FRONT-
RUNNER Annexure
74State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
MANIPUR
SECI Score: 36.0
Overall Rank: 23
Category: Smaller States
Category Rank: 3
PARAMETER-WISE & INDICATOR-WISE SCORE
S.No.Indicator NameScores
Parameter 1: DISCOM’s Performance 57.6)
1.1Debt Equity Ratio98.0
1.2AT&C Losses71.0
1.3T&D Losses28.0
1.4ACS – ARR gap83.3
1.5Implementation of ToD/ToU tariff for Consumers0.0
1.6States Implemented DBT Transfer0.0
1.7Open Access SurchargeNull
1.8Regulatory Assets100
1.9Complexity of Tariff98.2
Parameter 2: Access, affordability & reliability (34.1)
2.1Per capita energy consumption3.6
2.2Hours of Electricity Supplied (Industry)Null
2.3Hours of Electricity Supplied (Agri)Null
2.4Cross-Subsidization68.6
2.5Life-line electricity and tariff51.2
Parameter 3: Clean Energy Initiatives (4.7)
3.1Clean Cooking Fuel Supply13.1
3.2Renewable Energy Penetration1.04
3.3CNG Vehicle Penetration0.05
Parameter 4: Energy Efficiency (22.1)
4.1Energy Intensity of GSDP66.1
4.2Energy savings in Commercial & Public Buildings0.0
4.3Industrial energy Savings0.0
Parameter 5: Environmental Sustainability (41.3)
5.1Emission Intensity of GSDP97.8
5.2Utilization of RE potential0.0
5.3Percentage change in forest cover w.r.t 20056.3
5.4Forest carbon stock39.7
Parameter 6: New Initiatives (7.3)
6.1EV penetration22.0
6.2Availability of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Mobility Null
6.3Proportion of consumers with Smart meters0.0
ASPIRANTS Annexure
75State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
MEGHALAYA
SECI Score: 29.4
Overall Rank: 30
Category: Smaller States
Category Rank: 6
PARAMETER-WISE & INDICATOR-WISE SCORE
S.No.Indicator NameScores
Parameter 1: DISCOM’s Performance (47.9)
1.1Debt Equity Ratio0.0
1.2AT&C Losses46.3
1.3T&D Losses14.5
1.4ACS – ARR gap82.6
1.5Implementation of ToD/ToU tariff for Consumers33.3
1.6States Implemented DBT Transfer0.0
1.7Open Access Surcharge53.0
1.8Regulatory Assets100
1.9Complexity of Tariff97.1
Parameter 2: Access, affordability & reliability (30.9)
2.1Per capita energy consumption12.5
2.2Hours of Electricity Supplied (Industry)Null
2.3Hours of Electricity Supplied (Agri)Null
2.4Cross-Subsidization50.1
2.5Life-line electricity and tariff54.5
Parameter 3: Clean Energy Initiatives (1.9)
3.1Clean Cooking Fuel Supply0.0
3.2Renewable Energy Penetration5.7
3.3CNG Vehicle Penetration0.06
Parameter 4: Energy Efficiency (4.0)
4.1Energy Intensity of GSDP12.1
4.2Energy savings in Commercial & Public Buildings0.0
4.3Industrial energy Savings0.0
Parameter 5: Environmental Sustainability (39.8)
5.1Emission Intensity of GSDP93.1
5.2Utilization of RE potential0.2
5.3Percentage change in forest cover w.r.t 20056.4
5.4Forest carbon stock39.4
Parameter 6: New Initiatives (2.8)
6.1EV penetration8.5
6.2Availability of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Mobility Null
6.3Proportion of consumers with Smart meters0.0
ASPIRANT Annexure
76State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
MIZORAM
SECI Score: 35.9
Overall Rank: 24
Category: Smaller States
Category Rank: 4
PARAMETER-WISE & INDICATOR-WISE SCORE
S.No.Indicator NameScores
Parameter 1: DISCOM’s Performance (51.7)
1.1Debt Equity RatioNull
1.2AT&C LossesNull
1.3T&D Losses56.1
1.4ACS – ARR gapNull
1.5Implementation of ToD/ToU tariff for Consumers0.0
1.6States Implemented DBT Transfer0.0
1.7Open Access SurchargeNull
1.8Regulatory Assets100
1.9Complexity of Tariff98.2
Parameter 2: Access, affordability & reliability (39.3)
2.1Per capita energy consumption8.0
2.2Hours of Electricity Supplied (Industry)Null
2.3Hours of Electricity Supplied (Agri)Null
2.4Cross-Subsidization7.4
2.5Life-line electricity and tariff63.2
Parameter 3: Clean Energy Initiatives (18.9)
3.1Clean Cooking Fuel Supply34.8
3.2Renewable Energy Penetration22.0
3.3CNG Vehicle Penetration0.03
Parameter 4: Energy Efficiency (29.7)
4.1Energy Intensity of GSDP89.1
4.2Energy savings in Commercial & Public Buildings0.0
4.3Industrial energy Savings0.0
Parameter 5: Environmental Sustainability (38.2)
5.1Emission Intensity of GSDP99.2
5.2Utilization of RE potential0.07
5.3Percentage change in forest cover w.r.t 20054.3
5.4Forest carbon stock22.0
Parameter 6: New Initiatives (1.1)
6.1EV penetration3.4
6.2Availability of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Mobility Null
6.3Proportion of consumers with Smart meters0.0
ASPIRANT Annexure
77State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
NAGALAND
SECI Score: 27.9
Overall Rank: 33
Category: Smaller States
Category Rank: 7
PARAMETER-WISE & INDICATOR-WISE SCORE
S.No.Indicator NameScores
Parameter 1: DISCOM’s Performance (35.9)
1.1Debt Equity RatioNull
1.2AT&C Losses13.4
1.3T&D Losses59.4
1.4ACS – ARR gap64.7
1.5Implementation of ToD/ToU tariff for Consumers0.0
1.6States Implemented DBT Transfer0.0
1.7Open Access SurchargeNull
1.8Regulatory Assets100
1.9Complexity of Tariff97.1
Parameter 2: Access, affordability & reliability (32.9)
2.1Per capita energy consumption1.6
2.2Hours of Electricity Supplied (Industry)Null
2.3Hours of Electricity Supplied (Agri)Null
2.4Cross-Subsidization71.6
2.5Life-line electricity and tariff42.7
Parameter 3: Clean Energy Initiatives (12.2)
3.1Clean Cooking Fuel Supply7.0
3.2Renewable Energy Penetration29.5
3.3CNG Vehicle Penetration0.0
Parameter 4: Energy Efficiency (26.4)
4.1Energy Intensity of GSDP79.2
4.2Energy savings in Commercial & Public Buildings0.0
4.3Industrial energy Savings0.0
Parameter 5: Environmental Sustainability (40.0)
5.1Emission Intensity of GSDP98.9
5.2Utilization of RE potential0.08
5.3Percentage change in forest cover w.r.t 20050.0
5.4Forest carbon stock42.0
Parameter 6: New Initiatives (3.4)
6.1EV penetration10.2
6.2Availability of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Mobility Null
6.3Proportion of consumers with Smart meters0.0
ASPIRANT Annexure
78State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
SIKKIM
SECI Score: 33.3
Overall Rank: 27
Category: Smaller States
Category Rank: 5
PARAMETER-WISE & INDICATOR-WISE SCORE
S.No.Indicator NameScores
Parameter 1: DISCOM’s Performance (43.2)
1.1Debt Equity RatioNull
1.2AT&C Losses55.7
1.3T&D Losses28.6
1.4ACS – ARR gap88.4
1.5Implementation of ToD/ToU tariff for Consumers0.0
1.6States Implemented DBT Transfer0.0
1.7Open Access Surchargenull
1.8Regulatory Assets100
1.9Complexity of Tariff92.1
Parameter 2: Access, affordability & reliability (37.6)
2.1Per capita energy consumption13.7
2.2Hours of Electricity Supplied (Industry)Null
2.3Hours of Electricity Supplied (Agri)Null
2.4Cross-Subsidization49.5
2.5Life-line electricity and tariff87.2
Parameter 3: Clean Energy Initiatives (13.8)
3.1Clean Cooking Fuel Supply40.9
3.2Renewable Energy Penetration0.5
3.3CNG Vehicle Penetration0.1
Parameter 4: Energy Efficiency (33.3)
4.1Energy Intensity of GSDP100
4.2Energy savings in Commercial & Public Buildings0.0
4.3Industrial energy Savings0.0
Parameter 5: Environmental Sustainability (52.2)
5.1Emission Intensity of GSDP99.9
5.2Utilization of RE potential0.2
5.3Percentage change in forest cover w.r.t 20056.4
5.4Forest carbon stock100
Parameter 6: New Initiatives (0.6)
6.1EV penetration1.7
6.2Availability of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Mobility Null
6.3Proportion of consumers with Smart meters0.0
ASPIRANT Annexure
79State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
TRIPURA
SECI Score: 45.0
Overall Rank: 13
Category: Smaller States
Category Rank: 2
PARAMETER-WISE & INDICATOR-WISE SCORE
S.No.Indicator NameScores
Parameter 1: DISCOM’s Performance (57.3)
1.1Debt Equity Ratio93.7
1.2AT&C Losses40.4
1.3T&D Losses50.9
1.4ACS – ARR gap88.9
1.5Implementation of ToD/ToU tariff for Consumers33.3
1.6States Implemented DBT Transfer0.0
1.7Open Access SurchargeNull
1.8Regulatory Assets100
1.9Complexity of Tariff93.9
Parameter 2: Access, affordability & reliability (33.1)
2.1Per capita energy consumption1.8
2.2Hours of Electricity Supplied (Industry)Null
2.3Hours of Electricity Supplied (Agri)Null
2.4Cross-Subsidization73.0
2.5Life-line electricity and tariff41.6
Parameter 3: Clean Energy Initiatives (22.9)
3.1Clean Cooking Fuel Supply15.2
3.2Renewable Energy Penetration0.3
3.3CNG Vehicle Penetration53.2
Parameter 4: Energy Efficiency (31.7)
4.1Energy Intensity of GSDP95.0
4.2Energy savings in Commercial & Public Buildings0.0
4.3Industrial energy Savings0.0
Parameter 5: Environmental Sustainability (39.6)
5.1Emission Intensity of GSDP100
5.2Utilization of RE potential0.3
5.3Percentage change in forest cover w.r.t 20052.5
5.4Forest carbon stock32.7
Parameter 6: New Initiatives (58.7)
6.1EV penetration100
6.2Availability of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Mobility Null
6.3Proportion of consumers with Smart meters76.0
ACHIEVERS Annexure
80State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
ANDAMAN & NICOBAR
SECI Score: 29.4
Overall Rank: 31
Category: Union Territory
Category Rank: 5
PARAMETER-WISE & INDICATOR-WISE SCORE
S.No.Indicator NameScores
Parameter 1: DISCOM’s Performance (37.7)
1.1Debt Equity RatioNull
1.2AT&C Losses66.6
1.3T&D Losses88.5
1.4ACS – ARR gap0.0
1.5Implementation of ToD/ToU tariff for Consumers0.0
1.6States Implemented DBT Transfer0.0
1.7Open Access SurchargeNull
1.8Regulatory Assets100
1.9Complexity of Tariff99.6
Parameter 2: Access, affordability & reliability (35)
2.1Per capita energy consumption20.8
2.2Hours of Electricity Supplied (Industry)Null
2.3Hours of Electricity Supplied (Agri)Null
2.4Cross-Subsidization39.5
2.5Life-line electricity and tariff81.2
Parameter 3: Clean Energy Initiatives (20.6)
3.1Clean Cooking Fuel Supply50.3
3.2Renewable Energy Penetration11.5
3.3CNG Vehicle Penetration0.0
Parameter 4: Energy Efficiency (1.3)
4.1Energy Intensity of GSDP3.8
4.2Energy savings in Commercial & Public Buildings0.0
4.3Industrial energy Savings0.0
Parameter 5: Environmental Sustainability (49.5)
5.1Emission Intensity of GSDP92.4
5.2Utilization of RE potential0.3
5.3Percentage change in forest cover w.r.t 20057.7
5.4Forest carbon stock96.3
Parameter 6: New Initiatives (0.0)
6.1EV penetration0.0
6.2Availability of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Mobility Null
6.3Proportion of consumers with Smart meters0.0
ASPIRANT Annexure
81State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
CHANDIGARH
SECI Score: 55.7
Overall Rank: 1
Category: UTs
Category Rank: 1
PARAMETER-WISE & INDICATOR-WISE SCORE
S.No.Indicator NameScores
Parameter 1: DISCOM’s Performance (65.6)
1.1Debt Equity RatioNull
1.2AT&C Losses98.6
1.3T&D Losses71.2
1.4ACS – ARR gap94.7
1.5Implementation of ToD/ToU tariff for Consumers66.7
1.6States Implemented DBT Transfer0.0
1.7Open Access Surcharge30.1
1.8Regulatory Assets100
1.9Complexity of Tariff98.9
Parameter 2: Access, affordability & reliability (58.7)
2.1Per capita energy consumption16.2
2.2Hours of Electricity Supplied (Industry)100
2.3Hours of Electricity Supplied (Agri)100
2.4Cross-Subsidization59.9
2.5Life-line electricity and tariff72.0
Parameter 3: Clean Energy Initiatives (69.2)
3.1Clean Cooking Fuel Supply100
3.2Renewable Energy Penetration100
3.3CNG Vehicle Penetration7.6
Parameter 4: Energy Efficiency (16.2)
4.1Energy Intensity of GSDP48.6
4.2Energy savings in Commercial & Public Buildings0.0
4.3Industrial energy Savings0.0
Parameter 5: Environmental Sustainability (62.5)
5.1Emission Intensity of GSDP97.1
5.2Utilization of RE potential100
5.3Percentage change in forest cover w.r.t 200530.0
5.4Forest carbon stock21.1
Parameter 6: New Initiatives (14.1)
6.1EV penetration42.3
6.2Availability of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Mobility Null
6.3Proportion of consumers with Smart meters0.0
FRONT-
RUNNER Annexure
82State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
DAMAN & DIU AND DADRA & NAGAR HAVELI
SECI Score: 53.2
Overall Rank: 3
Category: UTs
Category Rank: 3
PARAMETER-WISE & INDICATOR-WISE SCORE
S.No.Indicator NameScores
Parameter 1: DISCOM’s Performance (71.5)
1.1Debt Equity RatioNull
1.2AT&C Losses100
1.3T&D Losses84.9
1.4ACS – ARR gap91.8
1.5Implementation of ToD/ToU tariff for Consumers0.0
1.6States Implemented DBT Transfer0.0
1.7Open Access Surcharge100
1.8Regulatory Assets100
1.9Complexity of Tariff98.2
Parameter 2: Access, affordability & reliability (60.3)
2.1Per capita energy consumption100
2.2Hours of Electricity Supplied (Industry)Null
2.3Hours of Electricity Supplied (Agri)Null
2.4Cross-Subsidization46.8
2.5Life-line electricity and tariff90.3
Parameter 3: Clean Energy Initiatives (68.6)
3.1Clean Cooking Fuel Supply93.3
3.2Renewable Energy Penetration100
3.3CNG Vehicle Penetration12.4
Parameter 4: Energy Efficiency (0)
4.1Energy Intensity of GSDP0.0
4.2Energy savings in Commercial & Public Buildings0.0
4.3Industrial energy Savings0.0
Parameter 5: Environmental Sustainability (36)
5.1Emission Intensity of GSDPNull
5.2Utilization of RE potentialNull
5.3Percentage change in forest cover w.r.t 2005100
5.4Forest carbon stock16.2
Parameter 6: New Initiatives (7.9)
6.1EV penetration23.8
6.2Availability of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Mobility Null
6.3Proportion of consumers with Smart meters0.0
FRONT-
RUNNER Annexure
83State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
DELHI
SECI Score: 55.6
Overall Rank: 2
Category: UTs
Category Rank: 2
PARAMETER-WISE & INDICATOR-WISE SCORE
S.No.Indicator NameScores
Parameter 1: DISCOM’s Performance (66.2)
1.1Debt Equity Ratio88.1
1.2AT&C Losses88.6
1.3T&D Losses77.4
1.4ACS – ARR gap95.0
1.5Implementation of ToD/ToU tariff for Consumers100.0
1.6States Implemented DBT Transfer0.0
1.7Open Access SurchargeNull
1.8Regulatory Assets0.0
1.9Complexity of Tariff97.8
Parameter 2: Access, affordability & reliability (38.3)
2.1Per capita energy consumption18.9
2.2Hours of Electricity Supplied (Industry)100
2.3Hours of Electricity Supplied (Agri)100
2.4Cross-Subsidization0.0
2.5Life-line electricity and tariff66.4
Parameter 3: Clean Energy Initiatives (67.2)
3.1Clean Cooking Fuel Supply95.1
3.2Renewable Energy Penetration6.5
3.3CNG Vehicle Penetration100
Parameter 4: Energy Efficiency (43.9)
4.1Energy Intensity of GSDP81.7
4.2Energy savings in Commercial & Public Buildings50.0
4.3Industrial energy Savings0.0
Parameter 5: Environmental Sustainability (38.6)
5.1Emission Intensity of GSDP99.7
5.2Utilization of RE potential2.5
5.3Percentage change in forest cover w.r.t 200515.0
5.4Forest carbon stock0.0
Parameter 6: New Initiatives (49.7)
6.1EV penetration84.7
6.2Availability of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Mobility 4.5
6.3Proportion of consumers with Smart meters59.9
FRONT-
RUNNER Annexure
84State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
JAMMU & KASHMIR
SECI Score: 29.3
Overall Rank: 32
Category: UTs
Category Rank: 6
PARAMETER-WISE & INDICATOR-WISE SCORE
S.No.Indicator NameScores
Parameter 1: DISCOM’s Performance (31.2)
1.1Debt Equity RatioNull
1.2AT&C Losses0.0
1.3T&D Losses21.9
1.4ACS – ARR gap81.6
1.5Implementation of ToD/ToU tariff for Consumers0.0
1.6States Implemented DBT Transfer0.0
1.7Open Access SurchargeNull
1.8Regulatory Assets100
1.9Complexity of Tariff89.2
Parameter 2: Access, affordability & reliability (51.4)
2.1Per capita energy consumption10.9
2.2Hours of Electricity Supplied (Industry)100
2.3Hours of Electricity Supplied (Agri)Null
2.4Cross-Subsidization64.0
2.5Life-line electricity and tariff85.8
Parameter 3: Clean Energy Initiatives (11.6)
3.1Clean Cooking Fuel Supply32.3
3.2Renewable Energy Penetration2.2
3.3CNG Vehicle Penetration0.01
Parameter 4: Energy Efficiency (9.9)
4.1Energy Intensity of GSDP29.7
4.2Energy savings in Commercial & Public Buildings0.0
4.3Industrial energy Savings0.0
Parameter 5: Environmental Sustainability (51.8)
5.1Emission Intensity of GSDP98.2
5.2Utilization of RE potential0.01
5.3Percentage change in forest cover w.r.t 200510.0
5.4Forest carbon stock94.4
Parameter 6: New Initiatives (4.5)
6.1EV penetration13.6
6.2Availability of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Mobility Null
6.3Proportion of consumers with Smart meters0.0
ASPIRANT Annexure
85State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
LAKSHADWEEP
SECI Score: 26.9
Overall Rank: 35
Category: UTs
Category Rank: 7
PARAMETER-WISE & INDICATOR-WISE SCORE
S.No.Indicator NameScores
Parameter 1: DISCOM’s Performance (42.9)
1.1Debt Equity RatioNull
1.2AT&C Losses81.6
1.3T&D Losses100
1.4ACS – ARR gap6.3
1.5Implementation of ToD/ToU tariff for Consumers0.0
1.6States Implemented DBT Transfer0.0
1.7Open Access SurchargeNull
1.8Regulatory Assets100
1.9Complexity of Tariff100
Parameter 2: Access, affordability & reliability (25.9)
2.1Per capita energy consumption11.0
2.2Hours of Electricity Supplied (Industry)Null
2.3Hours of Electricity Supplied (Agri)Null
2.4Cross-Subsidization14.4
2.5Life-line electricity and tariff90.6
Parameter 3: Clean Energy Initiatives (33.6)
3.1Clean Cooking Fuel Supply0.9
3.2Renewable Energy Penetration100
3.3CNG Vehicle Penetration0.0
Parameter 4: Energy Efficiency (0.0)
4.1Energy Intensity of GSDPNull
4.2Energy savings in Commercial & Public Buildings0.0
4.3Industrial energy Savings0.0
Parameter 5: Environmental Sustainability (7.1)
5.1Emission Intensity of GSDPNull
5.2Utilization of RE potential0.6
5.3Percentage change in forest cover w.r.t 200510.1
5.4Forest carbon stock22.0
Parameter 6: New Initiatives (0.0)
6.1EV penetrationNull
6.2Availability of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Mobility Null
6.3Proportion of consumers with Smart meters0.0
ASPIRANT Annexure
86State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
PUDUCHERRY
SECI Score: 48.5
Overall Rank: 8
Category: UTs
Category Rank: 4
PARAMETER-WISE & INDICATOR-WISE SCORE
S.No.Indicator NameScores
Parameter 1: DISCOM’s Performance (67.9)
1.1Debt Equity Ratio95.6
1.2AT&C Losses74.3
1.3T&D Losses71.3
1.4ACS – ARR gap86.4
1.5Implementation of ToD/ToU tariff for Consumers66.7
1.6States Implemented DBT Transfer0.0
1.7Open Access Surcharge0.0
1.8Regulatory Assets100
1.9Complexity of Tariff96.1
Parameter 2: Access, affordability & reliability (57.7)
2.1Per capita energy consumption24.6
2.2Hours of Electricity Supplied (Industry)100
2.3Hours of Electricity Supplied (Agri)100
2.4Cross-Subsidization42.0
2.5Life-line electricity and tariff86.0
Parameter 3: Clean Energy Initiatives (20.3)
3.1Clean Cooking Fuel Supply59.1
3.2Renewable Energy Penetration1.5
3.3CNG Vehicle Penetration0.0
Parameter 4: Energy Efficiency (0.6)
4.1Energy Intensity of GSDP1.9
4.2Energy savings in Commercial & Public Buildings0.0
4.3Industrial energy Savings0.0
Parameter 5: Environmental Sustainability (42.7)
5.1Emission Intensity of GSDP95.2
5.2Utilization of RE potential3.3
5.3Percentage change in forest cover w.r.t 200526.3
5.4Forest carbon stock12.6
Parameter 6: New Initiatives (37.9)
6.1EV penetration13.6
6.2Availability of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Mobility 0.0
6.3Proportion of consumers with Smart meters100
FRONT-
RUNNER Annexure
87State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
ANNEXURE 2: INDICATOR-WISE PERFORMANCE OF ALL STATES
DISCOM’s Performance
States/UTs
Debt
equity
ratio
AT&C
losses
T&D
losses
ACS-
ARR
gap
Imple
mentation
of ToD/
ToU Tariff
Imple
mentation
of DBT
transfer
Open
Access
Surcharge
Regula-
tory
Assets
Comp
lexity of
tariff
A&N Null66.688.5 0 0 0 Null 100 99.6
Andhra
Pradesh
0 87.867.290.4 100 0 53.1 100 67.7
Arunachal
Pradesh
0 26 0 68.1 0 0 0 100 95.3
Assam 95.965.542.791.6 33.3 0 47 100 93.9
Bihar 95.635.535.786.7 66.7 0 39.3 100 91.8
Chandigarh Null98.771.294.7 66.7 0 30.1 100 98.9
Chhattisgarh 0 65.147.590.0 66.7 0 57.1 100 85.7
D&D/D&N Null100 84.991.7 0 0 100 100 98.2
Delhi 88.192.477.490.0 100 0 Null 0 97.8
Goa Null82.180.788.0 66.7 0 39 100 92.8
Gujarat 99.585.656.991.2 66.7 0 49.5 100 57
Haryana 27.774.754.791.2 100 0 79.6 100 90
Himachal
Pradesh
0 86.273.291.0 0 0 17.7 100 95
J&K Null 0 21.981.5 0 0 Null 100 89.2
Jharkhand 45.341.567.784.7 0 0 59.1 100 95.7
Karnataka 0 76 66.789.2 66.7 0 33.9 69.7 78.5
Kerala 0 81.272.290.5 100 0 46.1 100 77.4
Lakshadweep Null81.6100 6.3 0 0 Null 100 100
Madhya
Pradesh
0 53.044.187.2 100 0 43.4 100 59.1
Maharashtra 81 71.557.788.5 66.7 0 24.1 25.8 43.7
Manipur 98 71.0 28 83.3 0 0 Null 100 98.2
Meghalaya 0 46.314.582.5 33.3 0 53.1 100 97.1
Mizoram Null70.356.1100 0 0 Null 100 98.2
Nagaland Null13.459.464.7 0 0 Null 100 97.1
Odisha 0 55.660.989.4 66.7 0 61.9 100 88.2
Puducherry 95.674.271.386.4 66.7 0 0 100 96.1
Punjab 89.781.469.590.1 66.7 0 77.2 100 77.8
Rajasthan 0 54.450.984.0 66.7 0 Null 100 92.1
Sikkim Null55.828.688.4 0 0 Null 100 92.1
Tamil Nadu 0 80.366.381.2 33.3 0 34.2 100 91
Telangana 0 68.7 71 86.0 66.7 0 13.9 100 76.3
Tripura 93.740.450.9 89 33.3 0 Null 100 93.9
Uttar Pradesh54.953.7 55 89 33.3 0 46.7 99.1 77.8
Uttarakhand 0 70.860.390.0 33.3 0 77.8 100 91.8
West Bengal 87.770.868.789.0 100 0 Null 20.5 0 Annexure
88State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
Access, Affordability & Reliability of Energy
States/UTs
Per capita
energy
consumption
Hours of
electricity
supplied
(industry)
Hours of
electricity
supplied
(Agriculture)
Cross-
subsidisation
Life-line
electricity
and tariff
A&N20.9 Null Null 39.5 81.3
Andhra Pradesh 9.9 100 5.6 38.2 83.5
Arunachal Pradesh 11.7 Null Null 85.7 57.9
Assam1.6 Null Null 95.8 29.9
Bihar0 100 66.7 74 18.5
Chandigarh16.3 100 100 59.9 72
Chhattisgarh15.3 100 66.7 36.6 62.2
D&D100 Null Null 46.8 90.3
Delhi18.9 100 100 0 66.4
Goa31.4 100 100 41.8 86.6
Gujarat25.7 100 11.4 67.9 58.7
Haryana27.3 100 12.8 68 61.9
Himachal Pradesh 16.1 100 100 67.8 47.3
J&K10.9 100 Null 64 85.8
Jharkhand6.3 100 77.8 68 22.1
Karnataka17 100 1.7 69.6 38.1
Kerala11.2 100 100 100 54.9
Lakshadweep11 Null Null 14.4 90.6
Madhya Pradesh 7.6 100 61.1 54.2 32.6
Maharashtra14.6 100 16.7 88.8 30.2
Manipur3.6 Null Null 68.6 51.2
Meghalaya12.5 Null Null 50.1 54.5
Mizoram8 Null Null 73.7 63.2
Nagaland1.6 Null Null 71.6 42.7
Orissa11.9 100 100 57.2 75.7
Puducherry24.6 100 100 42 86
Punjab22.2 100 0 74.1 30.6
Rajasthan11.5 100 1.7 89.1 0
Sikkim13.7 Null Null 49.5 87.3
Tamil Nadu19.1 100 16.7 28.7 100
Telangana22.5 100 100 55.5 79.5
Tripura1.8 Null Null 73 41.6
Uttar Pradesh 4.5 100 79.3 35 35.2
Uttarakhand14.4 100 97.7 56 65.2
West Bengal4.5 100 94.4 77.4 27.9 Annexure
89State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
Clean Energy Initiatives
States/UTs
Clean cooking fuel
supply
Renewable energy
penetration (at
generation level)
CNG Vehicle
Penetration
A&N50.311.50
Andhra Pradesh33.117.7Null
Arunachal Pradesh17.100.2
Assam12.60.20.1
Bihar9.80.93.9
Chandigarh1001007.6
Chhattisgarh5.50.80
D&D/D&N93.310012.4
Delhi95.16.5100
Goa87.11000
Gujarat32.413.771.4
Haryana55.13.969.8
Himachal Pradesh37.850.1
J&K32.42.30
Jharkhand5.503.4
Karnataka43.636.21.2
Kerala48.112.14.4
Lakshadweep0.91000
Madhya Pradesh12.760
Maharashtra43.69.548.8
Manipur13.110.1
Meghalaya05.70.1
Mizoram34.8220
Nagaland729.50
Odisha9.21.53.8
Puducherry59.31.50.1
Punjab57.89.411.2
Rajasthan24.719.52.2
Sikkim40.90.50.1
Tamil Nadu46.418.80
Telangana42.611.50
Tripura15.30.353.2
Uttar Pradesh19.53.914.5
Uttarakhand47.16.71.7
West Bengal23.21.90.4 Annexure
90State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
Energy Efficiency
States/UTs Energy intensity
Energy Savings in
Commercial & Public
Buildings
Industrial energy
savings
A&N3.800
Andhra Pradesh9.95060
Arunachal Pradesh59.300
Assam77040
Bihar48.3020
Chandigarh48.600
Chhattisgarh000
D&D/D&NNull00
Delhi81.7500
Goa49.900
Gujarat40.3080
Haryana3500
Himachal Pradesh60.300
J&K29.700
Jharkhand31.7020
Karnataka61.65060
Kerala74.10100
LakshadweepNull00
Madhya Pradesh24.800
Maharashtra6710060
Manipur66.200
Meghalaya12.100
Mizoram89.100
Nagaland79.200
Orissa25.3040
Puducherry1.900
Punjab15.25040
Rajasthan22.15060
Sikkim10000
Tamil Nadu56.1100100
Telangana54.210040
Tripura95.100
Uttar Pradesh165060
Uttarakhand71.4080
West Bengal63020 Annexure
91State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
Environmental Sustainability
States/UTs
Emission
intensity
Utilisation of RE
potential
Percentage
change in forest
cover
Forest carbon
stock
A&N92.40.37.796.4
Andhra Pradesh 83.81.814.711.2
Arunachal Pradesh 97.10.35.987.6
Assam96.30.18.429.8
Bihar82.70.512.511.4
Chandigarh97.11003021.1
Chhattisgarh00.76.321.4
D&D/D&NNullNull10016.3
Delhi99.72.5150
Goa980.19.746.4
Gujarat92.41.58.18.3
Haryana91.51.96.71.9
Himachal Pradesh 98.70.610.993
J&K98.201094.5
Jharkhand41.709.911.2
Karnataka95.42.511.933.3
Kerala98.6124.334.4
LakshadweepNull0.610.122
Madhya Pradesh 59.11.66.511.7
Maharashtra90.11.4721.8
Manipur97.806.339.7
Meghalaya93.20.26.439.4
Mizoram99.30.14.322
Nagaland98.90.1042
Odisha46.80.411.419
Puducherry95.20.326.312.6
Punjab88.6515.78.2
Rajasthan83.10.99.81.7
Sikkim99.90.26.4100
Tamil Nadu89.7417.117.6
Telangana83.62.214.49.7
Tripura1000.32.532.7
Uttar Pradesh 75.13.19.313.8
Uttarakhand98.10.96.282.9
West Bengal801.630.622.4 Annexure
92State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
New Initiatives
States/UTs EV penetration
Availability
of Charging
Infrastructure for
Electric Mobility
Proportion of
consumers with smart
meter
A&N0Null0
Andhra PradeshNullNull0
Arunachal Pradesh3.4Null0
Assam49.20.13.6
Bihar20.302.3
Chandigarh42.4Null0
Chhattisgarh11.90.60
D&D/D&N23.7Null0
Delhi84.74.559.9
Goa37.300
Gujarat10.24.51.8
Haryana20.30.30
Himachal Pradesh13.61000.8
J&K13.6Null0
Jharkhand11.916.10
Karnataka18.623.51.2
Kerala18.64.40.1
LakshadweepNullNull0
Madhya PradeshNullNull10
Maharashtra16.914.30
Manipur22Null0
Meghalaya8.5Null0
Mizoram3.4Null0
Nagaland10.2Null0
Orissa2Null0.6
Puducherry13.60100
Punjab6.800
Rajasthan11.902.5
Sikkim1.7Null0
Tamil Nadu11.900
TelanganaNullNull1.2
Tripura100Null76
Uttar Pradesh30.5Null51.7
Uttarakhand44.100
West Bengal25.40.61 Annexure
93State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
ANNEXURE 3: INDICATORS-SECI ROUND I
Parameter 1 DISCOM’s performance 40%
Indicator 1. 1 Debt Equity Ratio
Description
It provides information that will be used to assess the financial leverage
of DISCOMs. A low debt-equity ratio indicates less risk and therefore,
it attracts favorable investment and helps in further improvement of
DISCOM’s performance. The states with negative net worth reflect
DISCOMs weak financial profile.
Methodology
1. Total borrowings/Total net worth
39
Score = 0, if state’s net-worth is negative
Unit of measurement Ratio
Data Source PFC
Weights5
Type of indicator Regressive indicator
Normalization method (Highest-Actual)/(Highest-Lowest)
Indicator 1.2AT&C losses (Aggregate Technical & Commercial losses)
Description
The concept of Aggregate Technical & Commercial losses provides a
realistic picture of loss situation in the context it is measured. The DISCOMs
in each state should target to reduce AT&C losses through improvement
in billing efficiency and collection efficiency.
Methodology --
Unit of measurement Percentage
Data Source PFC
Weights7
Type of indicator Regressive indicator
Normalization method (Highest-Actual)/(Highest-Lowest)
Indicator 1.3T&D losses
40
Description
Transmission and distribution losses in the electricity sector occur when the
amount of electricity generated is greater than the amount of electricity
delivered to end-users. Few of the reasons for T & D losses are long
distribution lines, inappropriate size of conductors, theft etc. On the basis
of the score received, the state government can take several steps such as
improving quality of power lines, using correct size of transformers, steps
taken to reduce theft to reduce their technical losses.
39 https://pfcindia.com/DocumentRepository/ckfinder/files/GoI_Initiatives/Annual_Integrated_Ratings_of_State_
DISCOMs/9th%20Integrated%20Rating%20Booklet.pdf
40 Both T&D loss and AT&C loss have been included in the study because the correlation between them was not
high. And At 100% Collection Efficiency, AT&C Loss equals Distribution Loss. Transmission Losses, Energy Traded/
Inter-state sales and energy transmitted/wheeled under Open Access are not considered in the calculation of
AT&C Loss. Since Transmission Losses are not included in AT&C loss, it is possible that T&D losses are higher than
AT&C Losses. Annexure
94State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
Methodology --
Unit of measurement Percentage
Data Source CEA
Weights5
Type of indicator Regressive indicator
Normalization method (Highest-Actual)/(Highest-Lowest)
Indicator 1.4ACS-ARR Gap
Description
The gap between Average Cost of Supply (ACS) per unit and Average
Revenue Realised (ARR) per unit is one of the most important performance
parameters for power distribution in India. The DISCOM’s should aim
at achieving negative ACS-ARR gap which reflects profitability of the
DISCOM’s as they realise revenue higher than the cost.
Methodology
Gap on Tariff Subsidy received basis (adjusted for Regulatory Income and
UDAY Grant)
Unit of measurement INR/kWh
Data Source PFC
Weights7
Type of indicator Regressive indicator
Normalization method (Highest-Actual)/(Highest-Lowest)
Indicator 1.5Implementation of ToD/ToU tariff for Consumers
Description
The objective is to check whether consumers are being charged dynamic
prices for electricity consumed during peak and off-peak periods to shift
demand to off-peak periods thereby reducing peak demand.
Methodology
The data is available for three types of consumers, as given below:
1. Commercial Consumers (C): Value is 1, if implemented otherwise;
0 {Weightage: 0.83}
2. Residential Consumers (R): Value is 1, if implemented otherwise;
0 {Weightage: 0.83}
3. Industrial Consumers (I): Value is 1, if implemented otherwise;
0 {Weightage: 0.83}
4. Weighted score for each set of consumers is calculated separately as:
(Weighted score)
i
= Value
i
*0.83;
where i = type of consumer R, D & C
5. Total score of the indicator= Σ(Weighted score)
i
where i = type of consumer R, D & C
Unit of measurement Binary values
Data Source BEE
Weights2.5
Type of indicator Progressive indicator
Normalization method (Actual-Lowest)/(Highest-Lowest) Annexure
95State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
Indicator 1.6Implementation of Direct Benefit Transfer
Description
Under the National Electricity Policy, electricity is subsidized for the
agricultural sector. Now the government has proposed that state should
start Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) of electricity subsidy to farmers.
Methodology Value is 1, if implemented otherwise; 0
Unit of measurement Binary values
Data Source --
Weights2.5
Type of indicator Progressive indicator
Normalization method Not required
Indicator 1. 7 Open Access Surcharge
Description
An Open Access consumer, receiving the supply of electricity from a
person other than the distribution licensee of his area of supply, shall pay
to the distribution licensee, an additional surcharge on the charges of
wheeling, in addition to wheeling charges and cross-subsidy surcharge.
Methodology State-wise average of all OA surcharge
Unit of measurement Rs./Kwh
Data Source CEA
Weights5
Type of indicator Regressive indicator
Normalization method (Highest-Actual)/(Highest-Lowest)
Indicator 1.8Regulatory Assets
Description
Often SERCs do not increase tariffs to match the increasing costs of
DISCOMs, in order to shield consumers from tariff shocks. The higher costs
have to be absorbed by DISCOMs. However, they are recognised by the
regulator as regulatory assets, to be recovered through future tariff hikes.
Mounting regulatory assets create cash-flow problems for DISCOMs,
forcing them to borrow funds to cover the revenue deficit. The additional
borrowing, coupled with the interest, adds to the burden
41
. Therefore, the
states have to deal effectively with regulatory assets.
Methodology State-wise average of all OA surcharge
Unit of measurement Rs.(in crores)
Data Source PFC
Weights3
Type of indicator Regressive indicator
Normalization method (Highest-Actual)/(Highest-Lowest)
41 https://www.niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/2021-08/Electricity-Distribution-Report_030821.pdf Annexure
96State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
Indicator 1.9Complexity of Tariff
Description
A critical issue in the power sector is a complex tariff structure. Different
states and UTs have different categories of customers, different slabs and
sub-slabs, and different slabs for ToD/ToU tariffs. This makes it difficult
to understand the tariff structure. Some states also have different tariff
structures for public and private suppliers.
Methodology State-wise Numbers of categories of tariffs
Unit of measurement Numbers
Data Source CEA
Weights3
Type of indicator Regressive indicator
Normalization method (Highest-Actual)/(Highest-Lowest)
Parameter 2 Access, affordability and Reliability of Energy 15%
Accessibility of Energy
Indicator 2. 1 Per capita energy consumption
Description
The state’s performance in providing access to energy is measured by
per capita energy consumption. Per capita energy consumption has been
calculated by using state-wise consumption data of LPG, MS, HSD, PNG,
CNG, and electricity. The state-wise data for other forms of energy were
not available.
Methodology
1. Total energy consumption= Sum of LPG, MS, HSD, PNG, CNG, and
electricity consumption
2. Total energy consumption/State’s projected population
Unit of measurement kgoe/capita
Data Source MoPNG, CEA, PNGRB, Census
Weights4
Type of indicator Progressive indicator
Normalization method (Actual-Lowest)/(Highest-Lowest)
Reliability of Energy
Indicator 2.2Hours of electricity supplied (Industry)
Description
This indicator would show - the number of hours electricity is supplied
to the consumers. The number of hours for which electricity has been
supplied would be taken for the industrial sector in each state. The data
for commercial and domestic consumers is not available.
Methodology --
Unit of measurement Hours
Data Source CEA
Weights1.5
Type of indicator Progressive indicator
Normalization method (Actual-Lowest)/(Highest-Lowest) Annexure
97State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
Indicator 2.3Hours of electricity supplied (Agriculture) *
Description
This indicator would show the number of hours electricity is supplied
to the consumers. The number of hours for which electricity has been
supplied would be taken for the agriculture sector in each state. The data
for commercial and domestic consumers is not available.
Methodology --
Unit of measurement Hours
Data Source CEA
Weights1.5
Type of indicator Progressive indicator
Normalization method (Actual-Lowest)/(Highest-Lowest)
Affordability
Indicator 2.4Cross-subsidization
Description
The cross-subsidised electricity tariffs may encourage inefficiencies as the
industrial sector are required to pay high tariffs to subsidize the electricity
consumption in agriculture and domestic sector. This hampers the growth
and development of states.
Methodology
Average tariff rate of power (Industry) – Average tariff rate of power
(Domestic)
Unit of measurement INR/kWh
Data Source CEA
Weights5
Type of indicator Regressive indicator
Normalization method (Highest-Actual)/(Highest-Lowest)
Indicator 2.5Life-line electricity and tariff
National electricity policy aims at providing minimum lifeline consumption
of 1 unit/household/day electricity as a merit good. The indicator of
affordable energy in the state is also measured through average tariff rate
of power in the slab of 1KW connection load (100 kWh/Month), which
may represent affordability of lifeline support to households below the
poverty line, which would need to be adequately subsidized.
Methodology --
Data Source CEA
Weights3
Regressive indicator
Normalization method (Actual-Lowest)/(Highest-Lowest)
*State-wise data of hours of electricity supplied to domestic consumers and industrial consumers is not available. Annexure
98State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
Parameter 3 Clean Energy Initiatives 15%
Indicator 3. 1 Clean cooking fuel supply
Description
In order to understand the last-mile connectivity and availability of clean
energy source for cooking, the presence of LPG and PNG will be evaluated.
Since, the number of households using biomass fuels for cooking is
difficult to evaluate, the per capita sale of LPG (kg/capita) and per capita
PNG connection (scm/capita) in the state would give us an idea about the
same.
Methodology
1. {[State’s volume of LPG sales]/[Population]}*Calorific value
2. {[State’s volume of PNG sales]/[Population]}* Calorific value
Clean cooking fuel supply = 1+2 (convert kcal/capita to toe/capita)
Unit of measurement toe/capita
Data Source PPAC, PGRNB, Census
Weights5
Type of indicator Progressive indicator
Normalization method (Actual-Lowest)/(Highest-Lowest)
Indicator 3.2Renewable energy penetration (at generation level)
Description
This will provide a definitive assessment of high RE generation, and drive
states to ensure efficient pathways to achieve a low-carbon electricity
system.
Methodology
{Total electricity generation from RE sources/Total Electricity generation
from all sources}*100
Unit of measurement Gwh
Data Source CEA
Weights5
Type of indicator Progressive indicator
Normalization method (Actual-Lowest)/(Highest-Lowest)
Indicator 3.3CNG Vehicle Penetration
Description
In order to understand the penetration as well as the influence of the
various schemes/plans, the number of CNG vehicles will be evaluated. This
will help us in understanding the role of states in reducing and combating
pollution.
Methodology
If CNG infrastructure is available,
CNG vehicle penetration = {[State’s CNG vehicles registered]/[Total
number of vehicles registered]}*100;
Otherwise = null
Unit of measurement Percentage
Data Source MoRTH
Weights5
Type of indicator Progressive indicator
Normalization method (Actual-Lowest)/(Highest-Lowest) Annexure
99State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
Parameter 4 Energy efficiency 6%
Indicator 4. 1 Energy intensity
Description
Energy Intensity is measured by the quantity of energy required per unit
output or activity, so using less energy to produce a product reduces the
intensity. The lower the energy intensity of the state, the more energy-
efficient the state is, and would rank higher. The states will require
technological innovations, sufficient investment, and a good combination
of incentives and regulation to reduce their energy intensity. The total
energy consumption has been calculated by using state-wise consumption
data of LPG, MS, HSD, PNG, CNG, and electricity. The state-wise data for
other forms of energy were not available.
Methodology
1. Total energy consumption = Sum of LPG, MS, HSD, PNG, CNG, and
electricity consumption
2. Energy intensity = Total energy consumption/GSDP (constant price)
Unit of measurement kgoe/GDP in 1000 INR
Data Source MoPNG, PNGRB, CEA, RBI
Weights2
Type of indicator Regressive indicator
Normalization method (Highest-Actual)/(Highest-Lowest)
Indicator 4.2Energy Savings in Commercial & Public Buildings
Description
The indicator will evaluate the reduction in energy consumption in
commercial and public buildings, specifically due to the implementation
of EE measures
Methodology Data taken from State Energy Efficiency Index
Unit of measurement Scores
Data Source BEE
Weights2
Type of indicator Progressive indicator
Normalization method (Actual-Lowest)/(Highest-Lowest)
Indicator 4.3
Industrial energy savings in kWh/ktoe specifically due to
implementation of EE/EC measures
Description
The indicator will evaluate the energy savings (kWh/ktoe) in industrial
energy use, specifically due to energy efficiency/energy conservation
measures.
Methodology Data taken from State Energy Efficiency Index
Unit of measurement Scores
Data Source BEE
Weights2
Type of indicator Progressive indicator
Normalization method (Actual-Lowest)/(Highest-Lowest) Annexure
100State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
Parameter 5 Environmental Sustainability 12%
Indicator 5. 1 Emission intensity
Description
Emission intensity is the volume of emissions per unit of GDP. The state
should aim at reducing emission intensity, and target that less pollution
is being created per unit of GDP. The state-wise consumption data of
LPG, MS, HSD, PNG, CNG, coal and respective emission factors
42
and
conversion factors
43
has been used for calculation. The state-wise data for
other forms of energy were not available.
Methodology
Energy source: LPG, MS, HSD, PNG, CNG and coal consumption
1. CO2 Emissions (tonnes) = S(Energy sourcei * Emission factor)
2. CH4 Emissions (tonnes) = S(Energy sourcei * Emission factor)
3. N2O Emissions (tonnes) = S(Energy sourcei * Emission factor)
4. CO2eq Emissions (tonnes) = CO2 Emissions + (CH4 Emissions *
conversion factor) + (N2O Emissions*conversion factor)
5. Emission intensity = CO2eq Emissions/GSDP (constant)
Unit of measurement kgCO2eq/GSDP in 1000 INR
Data Source CEA, MoPNG, PPAC, PGRNB, RBI
Weights4
Type of indicator Regressive indicator
Normalization method (Highest-Actual)/(Highest-Lowest)
Indicator 5.2Utilisation of RE potential
Description
The indicator will measure the State’s effort to achieve about 40 per cent
cumulative electric power installed capacity from non-fossil fuel-based
energy resources by 2030. As of July 2021, India had 98.8 GW of installed
renewable energy capacity.
Methodology (RE installed capacity/RE potential)*100
Unit of measurement Percentage
Data Source CEA, MNRE
Weights2
Type of indicator Progressive indicator
Normalization method (Actual-Lowest)/(Highest-Lowest)
42 https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/INDIA_%20BUR-3_20.02.2021_High.pdf; https://www.ipcc-nggip.
iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/pdf/2_Volume2/V2_2_Ch2_Stationary_Combustion.pdf
43 http://www.ercevolution.energy/ipcc-sixth-assessment-report/ Annexure
101State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
Indicator 5.3Percentage change in forest cover
Description
The Total Forest Cover (TFC) of India is 712,249 square kilometres (sq
km) according to the biennial assessment of India State of forest Report
2019 (ISFR, 2019). India has set a target of bringing 33 percent of its
geographical area under forest cover. The TFC of India in 2019 is 21.67
percent of the total geographical area (TGA) of the country.
Methodology Percentage change in forest cover since 2005.
Unit of measurement Percentage change
Data Source India State of Forest Report 2019
Weights4
Type of indicator Progressive indicator
Normalization method (Actual-Lowest)/(Highest-Lowest)
Indicator 5.4Forest carbon stock
Description
Very dense forests, which absorb maximum carbon dioxide from the
atmosphere, increased by a mere 1.14 % between 2017 and 2019, according
to the India State of Forest Report 2019 (ISFR, 2019). This indicator has
been incorporated to check the State’s efforts to increase its forest carbon
stock.
Methodology --
Unit of measurement Per ha carbon stock in tonnes
Data Source India State of Forest Report 2019
Weights2
Type of indicator Progressive indicator
Normalization method (Actual-Lowest)/(Highest-Lowest)
Parameter 6 New Initiatives 12%
Indicator 6. 1 EV Penetration
Description
In order to understand the penetration as well as the influence of the
various schemes/plans, the number of EV vehicles will be evaluated. This
will help us in understanding the role of states in reducing and combating
pollution.
Methodology
[State’s EV & Hybrid Registered number]/[Total number of vehicles
registered] * 100
Unit of measurement Percentage
Data Source MoRTH
Weights4
Type of indicator Progressive indicator
Normalization method (Actual-Lowest)/(Highest-Lowest) Annexure
102State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
Indicator 6.2Availability of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Mobility
Description
The availability of adequate charging stations is important to promote EV
penetration.
Methodology
1. If EV>0,
(No. of charging stations/EV vehicles)*100
Otherwise = null
Unit of measurement Percentage
Data Source CEA
Weights4
Type of indicator Progressive indicator
Normalization method (Actual-Lowest)/(Highest-Lowest)
Indicator 6.3Proportion of consumers with smart meter
Description
Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) facilitates monitoring and
measurement of consumer information through Smart Meters installed at
customer premises. Smart meters will also enable Time of Day (ToD) and
Critical Peak Pricing (CPP)/Real-Time Pricing (RTP) rate metering and
monitoring based on energy consumption.
Methodology
1. State-wise cumulative numbers of smart meters installed/State-wise
total no. of consumers
Unit of measurement Percentage
Data Source CEA
Weights4
Type of indicator Progressive indicator
Normalization method (Actual-Lowest)/(Highest-Lowest)
List of progressive and regressive indicators
IndicatorsType of indicator
Debt equity ratioRegressive indicator
AT&C lossesRegressive indicator
ACS-ARR gapRegressive indicator
T&D lossesRegressive indicator
Implementation of ToD/ToU TariffProgressive indicator
Implementation of Direct Benefit TransferProgressive indicator
Open Access ChargesRegressive indicator
Regulatory Assets Regressive indicator
Complexity of TariffRegressive indicator
Per capita energy consumptionProgressive indicator Annexure
103State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
IndicatorsType of indicator
Hours of electricity supplied (industry)Progressive indicator
Hours of electricity supplied (Agriculture)Progressive indicator
Cross-subsidizationRegressive indicator
Life-line electricity and tariff Progressive indicator
Clean cooking fuel supplyProgressive indicator
Renewable energy penetrationProgressive indicator
CNG vehicle penetrationProgressive indicator
Energy intensityRegressive indicator
Energy Savings in Commercial & Public BuildingsProgressive indicator
Industrial energy savings Progressive indicator
Emission intensityRegressive indicator
Utilisation of RE potentialProgressive indicator
Percentage change in forest coverProgressive indicator
Forest carbon stock Progressive indicator
EV penetrationProgressive indicator
Availability of charging infrastructure for electric mobility Progressive indicator
Proportion of consumers with smart metersProgressive indicator Annexure
104State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
ANNEXURE 4: STATES WITH NULL VALUES FOR ALL INDICATORS
IndicatorsStates with Null Values
Debt equity ratio
A&N, Arunachal Pradesh, Chandigarh, D&D, Goa, J&K,
Lakshadweep, Mizoram, Nagaland, Sikkim
AT&C lossesNone
ACS-ARR gapNone
T&D lossesNone
Implementation of ToD/ToU TariffNone
Implementation of Direct Benefit
Transfer
None
Open Access Charges
A&N, Arunachal Pradesh, Delhi, J&K, Lakshadweep, Manipur,
Mizoram, Nagaland, Rajasthan, Sikkim, Telangana, Tripura,
West Bengal
Regulatory Assets None
Complexity of TariffNone
Per capita energy consumption None
Hours of electricity supplied
(industry)
A&N, Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, D&N, D&D, Lakshadweep,
Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Sikkim, Tripura
Hours of electricity supplied
(Agriculture)
A&N, Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, D&N, D&D, J&K, Lakshadweep,
Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Sikkim, Tripura
Cross-subsidizationNone
Life-line electricity and tariff None
Clean cooking fuel supply None
Renewable energy penetration None
CNG vehicle penetration Andhra Pradesh
Energy intensityD&N, D&D, Lakshadweep
Energy Savings in Commercial &
Public Buildings
None
Industrial energy savings None
Emission intensityD&N, D&D, Lakshadweep
Utilisation of RE sources D&N, D&D
Percentage change in forest
cover
None
Forest carbon stock None
EV penetrationAndhra Pradesh, Lakshadweep, Madhya Pradesh, Telangana
Availability of charging
infrastructure for electric mobility
A&N, Andhra Pradesh, Arunachal Pradesh, Chandigarh,
D&N, D&D, J&K, Lakshadweep, Madhya Pradesh, Manipur,
Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Orissa, Sikkim, Telangana,
Tripura, Uttar Pradesh
Proportion of consumers with
smart meters
None Annexure
105State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
ANNEXURE 5: CORRELATION MATRIX OF ALL THE INDICATORS
Debt
equity
ratio
AT&C
losses
ACS-
ARR
gap
T&D
losses
Implemen
tation of
ToD/ToU
Tariff
Implemen
tation
of Direct
Benerfit
Transfer
Open
Access
Charges
Regulatory
Assests
Complexity
of Tariff
Per capita
energy
consumption
Hours of
electricity
supplied
(industry)
Hours of
electricity
supplied
(Agriculture)
Cross-
subsidization
Life-line
electricity
and
tariff
Clean
cooking
fuel
supply
Renewable
energy
penetration
CNG vehicle
penetration
Energy
intensity
Energy
Savings in
Commercial
& Public
Buildings
Industrial
energy
savings
Emission
intensity
Utilisation
of RE
potential
Percentage
change
in forest
cover
Forest
carbon
stock
EV
penetra
tion
Availability
of charging
infrastructure
for electric
mobility
Proportion
of
consumers
with smart
meters
Debt equity ratio1
AT&C losses0.121
ACS-ARR gap-0.030.171
T&D losses0.030.7-0.071
Implementation of
ToD/ToU Tariff
0.13-0.37-0.36-0.191
Implementation of
Direct Benerfit Transfer
000001
Open Access Charges -0.150.080.25-0.040.1301
Regulatory Assests 0.24-0.21-0.1-0.170.3900.251
Complexity of Tariff 0.09-0.11-0.19-0.060.5300.150.531
Per capita energy
consumption
0.01-0.48-0.02-0.37-0.060-0.42-0.05-0.131
Hours of electricity
supplied (industry)
00000000000
Hours of electricity
supplied (Agriculture)
-0.380.08-0.16-0.33-0.1400.290.05-0.16-0.1201
Cross-subsidization -0.01-0.230.14-0.38-0.010-0.010.11-0.240.2400.231
Life-line electricity
and tariff
0.230.25-0.170.250.180-0.010.20.31-0.430-0.26-0.611
Clean cooking fuel
supply
0.03-0.66-0.04-0.470.240-0.020.25-0.10.6200.150.25-0.411
Renewable energy
penetration
0.08-0.53-0.11-0.52-0.10-0.12-0.11-0.210.5200.10.28-0.380.481
CNG vehicle
penetration
0.29-0.25-0.17-0.110.390-0.220.50.120.130-0.240.160.050.31-0.121
Energy intensity0.070.10.28-0.080.220-0.16-0.280.020.280-0.250.29-0.05-0.11-0.05-0.191
Energy Savings in
Commercial & Public
Buildings
0.13-0.23-0.08-0.180.2700.310.340.240.020-0.420.130.030.18-0.080.180.021
Industrial energy
savings
-0.08-0.25-0.18-0.150.33000.030.33-0.090-0.38-0.220.14-0.01-0.170.04-0.010.531
Emission intensity 0.050.21-0.09-0.010.190-0.26-0.080.15-0.1100.060.180.16-0.43-0.22-0.160.51-0.04-0.031
Utilisation of RE
potential
0.21-0.34-0.13-0.140.1300.15-0.04-0.10.0900.170.01-0.110.470.53-0.010.01-0.05-0.1-0.091
Percentage change
in forest cover
-0.03-0.44-0.14-0.360.010-0.340.060.040.8400.340.11-0.260.520.49-0.040.14-0.03-0.03-0.060.481
Forest carbon stock -0.540.350.450.3-0.5900.09-0.19-0.23-0.0900.38-0.08-0.26-0.04-0.11-0.35-0.23-0.34-0.23-0.32-0.1-0.21
EV penetration0.06-0.14-0.28-0.170.260-0.020.34-0.07-0.0600.420.190.080.270.110.52-0.420.03-0.08-0.230.170.03-0.191
Availability of charging
infrastructure for
electric mobility
-0.4-0.09-0.16-0.26-0.5200.38-0.03-0.11-0.0200.18-0.090.1-0.05-0.07-0.11-0.18-0.07-0.2-0.12-0.14-0.120.62-0.161
Proportion of
consumers with
smart meters
0.220.02-0.1-0.090.2100.320.17-0.12-0.0300.230.28-0.030.16-0.210.450.050-0.18-0.13-0.07-0.01-0.250.53-0.141 Annexure
106State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
ANNEXURE 6: RAW DATA OF EACH STATE FOR ALL INDICATORS
States/UTs
DISCOM’S PERFORMANCEACCESS, AFFORDABILITY, AND RELIABILITY OF ENERGY
States/UTs
CLEAN ENERGY INITIATIVESENERGY EFFICIENCY ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITYNEW INITIATIVES
Debt
equity
ratio
AT&C
losses
(Percent
age)
ACS-ARR
gap
(INR/
kWh)
T&D
losses
(Percent
age)
Implemen
tation of
ToD/ToU
Tariff
Implemen
tation
of Direct
Benerfit
Transfer
Open
Access
Charges
(Rs./
kWh)
Regulatory
Assests
(Rs. In
crores)
Complexity
of Tariff
(Numbers)
Per capita
energy
consumption
(kgoe/
capita)
Hours of
electricity
supplied
(industry)
(Hours)
Hours of
electricity
supplied
(Agriculture)
(Hours)
Cross-
subsidisation
(INR/kWh)
Life-line
electricity
and tariff
(INR/kWh)
Clean
cooking
fuel supply
(toe/
capita)
Renewable
energy
penetration
(Percentage)
CNG vehicle
penetration
(Percentage)
Energy
intensity
(kgoe/GDP
in 1000
INR)
Energy
Savings in
Commercial
& Public
Buildings
Industrial
energy
savings
Emission
intensity
(kgCO2eq/
GSDP in
1000 INR)
Utilisation
of RE
potential
(Percen
tage)
Percentage
change
in forest
cover
Forest
carbon
stock (Per
ha carbon
stock in
tonnes)
EV
penetration
(Percentage)
Availability
of charging
infrastructure
for electric
mobility
(Percentage)
Proportion
of consumers
with smart
meters
(Percentage)
A&N Null22.719.67.5 0 0 Null0 15 337.5NullNull 2.9 2.3A&N 0.03711.6 0 2.9 0 0 0.0081.41.2167.20 Null 0
Andhra
Pradesh
-1.410.80.1217 3 0 1.30 104 197.724 7 3 2.1
Andhra
Pradesh
0.02817.8 Null 2.7 1 1.50.0147.310.175.3Null Null 0
Arunachal
Pradesh
Null45.84.9247.10 0 Null0 27 220.3NullNull -0.1 4
Arunachal
Pradesh
0.02 0.2 0.1 1.7 0 0 0.0041.3-1.2157.70.2 Null 0
Assam 0.323.4-0.1428 1 0 1.40 31 92 NullNull -0.7 6.1Assam 0.0170.3 0.1 1.4 0 1 0.0050.6 2.195.42.9 0.0000.002
Bihar 0.440.40.9231.12 0 1.60 37 71.824 18 0.7 7Bihar 0.0161.1 0.4 1.9 0 0.50.0152.17.475.6 1.2 0 0.002
ChandigarhNull4.6-0.8215.32 0 1.80 17 279 24 24 1.6 3Chandigarh0.063100 0.7 1.9 0 0 0.004397.629.686 2.5 Null 0
Chhattisgarh-1.523.7-0.1825.92 0 1.20 54 267 24 18 3.1 3.7Chhattisgarh0.0141 0.1 2.9 0 0 0.0772.8-0.686.40.7 0.000 0
D&D/D&N0 3.9-0.29.1 0 0 0.20 19 1345NullNull 2.4 1.6D&D/D&N0.06 100 1.1 Null 0 0 NullNull118.780.8 1.4 Null 0
Delhi 0.98.20.212.53 0 Null23139.520 312.724 24 5.3 3.4Delhi 0.0616.6 8.9 1.3 1 0 0.00210 10.563.3 5 0.0030.040
Goa Null140.611 2 0 1.60 34 471.724 24 2.7 1.9Goa 0.057100 0.1 1.9 0 0 0.0040.63.8113.32.2 0 0
Gujarat0.112-0.121.62 0 1.40 134 399.524 8.1 1.1 4Gujarat0.02813.9 6.4 2.1 0 2 0.0085.91.872.20.6 0.0030.001
Haryana5.118.2-0.122.63 0 0.70 42 419.224 8.3 1.1 3.7Haryana0.04 4.1 6.2 2.2 0 0 0.0087.9-0.265.3 1.2 0.0000.022
Himachal
Pradesh
-7.511.7-0.0214.40 0 2.10 28 276.424 24 1.1 4.8
Himachal
Pradesh
0.0315.1 0.1 1.7 0 0 0.0032.65.3163.60.8 0.0750.001
J&K Null60.52.0337.30 0 Null0 44 210.924 Null 1.4 2J&K 0.0282.4 0.1 2.3 0 0 0.0030.2 4.1165.20.8 Null 0
Jharkhand3.937.11.316.80 0 1.20 26 151.424 20 1.1 6.7Jharkhand0.0140.1 0.3 2.3 0 0.50.0460.3 4 75.40.7 0.012 0
Karnataka7.117.50.417.32 0 1.77001.274 288.724 6.3 1 5.5Karnataka0.03436.3 0.2 1.7 1 1.50.0069.96.699.2 1.1 0.0180.001
Kerala-3.714.50.1014.83 0 1.50 77 213.824 244.3Kerala 0.03612.2 0.4 1.4 0 2.50.0034.322.4100.41.1 0.0030.000
LakshadweepNull14.318.22.3 0 0 Null0 14 212.4NullNull 4.4 1.6Lakshadweep0.011100 0 Null 0 0 Null2.54.3 87 Null Null 0
Madhya
Pradesh
-1.630.40.7927.33 0 1.50 128 168.424 17 2 5.9
Madhya
Pradesh
0.0176.1 0 2.4 0 0 0.0336.3-0.475.9Null Null 0.007
Maharashtra1.4200.5321.32 0 2 17173.8171 257.124 9 -0.3 6.1Maharashtra0.0349.6 4.4 1.6 2 1.50.015.90.386.8 1 0.011 0
Manipur0.220.31.6434.60 0 Null0 19 117.8NullNull 1.1 4.5Manipur0.0181.2 0.1 1.6 0 0 0.0040.1-0.7106.11.3 Null 0
Meghalaya 34.31.8140.61 0 1.30 22 231.2NullNull 2.2 4.3Meghalaya0.0115.9 0.1 2.7 0 0 0.0070.8-0.5105.80.5 Null 0
MizoramNull20.7-1.9422 0 0 Null0 19 174.1NullNull 0.8 3.6Mizoram0.02922.1 0.1 1.1 0 0 0.0030.5-3.287 0.2 Null 0
NagalandNull52.95.6220.50 0 Null0 22 92.8NullNull 0.9 5.2Nagaland0.01529.6 0 1.3 0 0 0.0030.5-8.7108.60.6 Null 0
Orissa-0.8290.3419.82 0 1.10 47 223.424 24 1.8 2.7Orissa 0.0161.6 0.4 2.4 0 1 0.0421.65.983.70.2 Null 0.000
Puducherry0.418.51 15.22 0 2.50 25 385.224 24 2.7 1.9Puducherry0.0421.6 0.1 2.9 0 0 0.0061.524.876.90.8 0 0.068
Punjab0.814.40.216 2 0 0.70 76 354.324 6 0.7 6.1Punjab 0.0419.6 1 2.6 1 1 0.01120.211.472.10.4 0 0
Rajasthan-1.129.71.524.32 0 Null0 36 218.824 6.3 -0.3 8.4Rajasthan0.02419.7 0.2 2.5 1 1.50.0153.63.965.10.7 0 0.002
SikkimNull28.90.634.30 0 Null0 36 246.2NullNull 2.3 1.8Sikkim 0.0320.6 0.1 0.9 0 0 0.0021.1-0.5171.10.1 Null 0
Tamil Nadu-1.8152.117.41 0 1.70 39 314.724 9 3.6 0.9Tamil Nadu0.03519 0 1.8 2 2.50.0116.213.182.20.7 0 0
Telangana 21.61.115.32 0 2.20 80 357.924 24 1.9 2.4Telangana0.03311.6 0 1.8 2 1 0.0148.99.773.7Null Null 0.001
Tripura0.537.60.4324.31 0 Null0 31 94.8NullNull 0.8 5.3Tripura0.0190.5 4.8 1 0 0 0.0021.2-5.598.55.9 Null 0.051
Uttar Pradesh3.230.10.522.51 0 1.4210.776 129.224 20.3 3.2 5.7Uttar Pradesh0.0214 1.3 2.6 1 1.50.02112.33.3 78.11.8 Null 0.035
Uttarakhand-3.520.40.2120.11 0 0.70 37 255.824 23.6 1.9 3.5Uttarakhand0.0366.8 0.2 1.5 0 2 0.0043.6-0.8152.72.6 0.000 0
West Bengal0.920.40.4216.43 0 Null18387.7293 129.724 23 0.5 6.3West Bengal0.0232 0.1 1.6 0 0.50.0176.530.487.41.5 0.0000.001 Annexure
107State Energy & Climate Index Round-I
ANNEXURE 6: RAW DATA OF EACH STATE FOR ALL INDICATORS
States/UTs
DISCOM’S PERFORMANCEACCESS, AFFORDABILITY, AND RELIABILITY OF ENERGY
States/UTs
CLEAN ENERGY INITIATIVESENERGY EFFICIENCY ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITYNEW INITIATIVES
Debt
equity
ratio
AT&C
losses
(Percent
age)
ACS-ARR
gap
(INR/
kWh)
T&D
losses
(Percent
age)
Implemen
tation of
ToD/ToU
Tariff
Implemen
tation
of Direct
Benerfit
Transfer
Open
Access
Charges
(Rs./
kWh)
Regulatory
Assests
(Rs. In
crores)
Complexity
of Tariff
(Numbers)
Per capita
energy
consumption
(kgoe/
capita)
Hours of
electricity
supplied
(industry)
(Hours)
Hours of
electricity
supplied
(Agriculture)
(Hours)
Cross-
subsidisation
(INR/kWh)
Life-line
electricity
and tariff
(INR/kWh)
Clean
cooking
fuel supply
(toe/
capita)
Renewable
energy
penetration
(Percentage)
CNG vehicle
penetration
(Percentage)
Energy
intensity
(kgoe/GDP
in 1000
INR)
Energy
Savings in
Commercial
& Public
Buildings
Industrial
energy
savings
Emission
intensity
(kgCO2eq/
GSDP in
1000 INR)
Utilisation
of RE
potential
(Percen
tage)
Percentage
change
in forest
cover
Forest
carbon
stock (Per
ha carbon
stock in
tonnes)
EV
penetration
(Percentage)
Availability
of charging
infrastructure
for electric
mobility
(Percentage)
Proportion
of consumers
with smart
meters
(Percentage)
A&N Null22.719.67.5 0 0 Null0 15 337.5NullNull 2.9 2.3A&N 0.03711.6 0 2.9 0 0 0.0081.41.2167.20 Null 0
Andhra
Pradesh
-1.410.80.1217 3 0 1.30 104 197.724 7 3 2.1
Andhra
Pradesh
0.02817.8 Null 2.7 1 1.50.0147.310.175.3Null Null 0
Arunachal
Pradesh
Null45.84.9247.10 0 Null0 27 220.3NullNull -0.1 4
Arunachal
Pradesh
0.02 0.2 0.1 1.7 0 0 0.0041.3-1.2157.70.2 Null 0
Assam 0.323.4-0.1428 1 0 1.40 31 92 NullNull -0.7 6.1Assam 0.0170.3 0.1 1.4 0 1 0.0050.6 2.195.42.9 0.0000.002
Bihar 0.440.40.9231.12 0 1.60 37 71.824 18 0.7 7Bihar 0.0161.1 0.4 1.9 0 0.50.0152.17.475.6 1.2 0 0.002
ChandigarhNull4.6-0.8215.32 0 1.80 17 279 24 24 1.6 3Chandigarh0.063100 0.7 1.9 0 0 0.004397.629.686 2.5 Null 0
Chhattisgarh-1.523.7-0.1825.92 0 1.20 54 267 24 18 3.1 3.7Chhattisgarh0.0141 0.1 2.9 0 0 0.0772.8-0.686.40.7 0.000 0
D&D/D&N0 3.9-0.29.1 0 0 0.20 19 1345NullNull 2.4 1.6D&D/D&N0.06 100 1.1 Null 0 0 NullNull118.780.8 1.4 Null 0
Delhi 0.98.20.212.53 0 Null23139.520 312.724 24 5.3 3.4Delhi 0.0616.6 8.9 1.3 1 0 0.00210 10.563.3 5 0.0030.040
Goa Null140.611 2 0 1.60 34 471.724 24 2.7 1.9Goa 0.057100 0.1 1.9 0 0 0.0040.63.8113.32.2 0 0
Gujarat0.112-0.121.62 0 1.40 134 399.524 8.1 1.1 4Gujarat0.02813.9 6.4 2.1 0 2 0.0085.91.872.20.6 0.0030.001
Haryana5.118.2-0.122.63 0 0.70 42 419.224 8.3 1.1 3.7Haryana0.04 4.1 6.2 2.2 0 0 0.0087.9-0.265.3 1.2 0.0000.022
Himachal
Pradesh
-7.511.7-0.0214.40 0 2.10 28 276.424 24 1.1 4.8
Himachal
Pradesh
0.0315.1 0.1 1.7 0 0 0.0032.65.3163.60.8 0.0750.001
J&K Null60.52.0337.30 0 Null0 44 210.924 Null 1.4 2J&K 0.0282.4 0.1 2.3 0 0 0.0030.2 4.1165.20.8 Null 0
Jharkhand3.937.11.316.80 0 1.20 26 151.424 20 1.1 6.7Jharkhand0.0140.1 0.3 2.3 0 0.50.0460.3 4 75.40.7 0.012 0
Karnataka7.117.50.417.32 0 1.77001.274 288.724 6.3 1 5.5Karnataka0.03436.3 0.2 1.7 1 1.50.0069.96.699.2 1.1 0.0180.001
Kerala-3.714.50.1014.83 0 1.50 77 213.824 244.3Kerala 0.03612.2 0.4 1.4 0 2.50.0034.322.4100.41.1 0.0030.000
LakshadweepNull14.318.22.3 0 0 Null0 14 212.4NullNull 4.4 1.6Lakshadweep0.011100 0 Null 0 0 Null2.54.3 87 Null Null 0
Madhya
Pradesh
-1.630.40.7927.33 0 1.50 128 168.424 17 2 5.9
Madhya
Pradesh
0.0176.1 0 2.4 0 0 0.0336.3-0.475.9Null Null 0.007
Maharashtra1.4200.5321.32 0 2 17173.8171 257.124 9 -0.3 6.1Maharashtra0.0349.6 4.4 1.6 2 1.50.015.90.386.8 1 0.011 0
Manipur0.220.31.6434.60 0 Null0 19 117.8NullNull 1.1 4.5Manipur0.0181.2 0.1 1.6 0 0 0.0040.1-0.7106.11.3 Null 0
Meghalaya 34.31.8140.61 0 1.30 22 231.2NullNull 2.2 4.3Meghalaya0.0115.9 0.1 2.7 0 0 0.0070.8-0.5105.80.5 Null 0
MizoramNull20.7-1.9422 0 0 Null0 19 174.1NullNull 0.8 3.6Mizoram0.02922.1 0.1 1.1 0 0 0.0030.5-3.287 0.2 Null 0
NagalandNull52.95.6220.50 0 Null0 22 92.8NullNull 0.9 5.2Nagaland0.01529.6 0 1.3 0 0 0.0030.5-8.7108.60.6 Null 0
Orissa-0.8290.3419.82 0 1.10 47 223.424 24 1.8 2.7Orissa 0.0161.6 0.4 2.4 0 1 0.0421.65.983.70.2 Null 0.000
Puducherry0.418.51 15.22 0 2.50 25 385.224 24 2.7 1.9Puducherry0.0421.6 0.1 2.9 0 0 0.0061.524.876.90.8 0 0.068
Punjab0.814.40.216 2 0 0.70 76 354.324 6 0.7 6.1Punjab 0.0419.6 1 2.6 1 1 0.01120.211.472.10.4 0 0
Rajasthan-1.129.71.524.32 0 Null0 36 218.824 6.3 -0.3 8.4Rajasthan0.02419.7 0.2 2.5 1 1.50.0153.63.965.10.7 0 0.002
SikkimNull28.90.634.30 0 Null0 36 246.2NullNull 2.3 1.8Sikkim 0.0320.6 0.1 0.9 0 0 0.0021.1-0.5171.10.1 Null 0
Tamil Nadu-1.8152.117.41 0 1.70 39 314.724 9 3.6 0.9Tamil Nadu0.03519 0 1.8 2 2.50.0116.213.182.20.7 0 0
Telangana 21.61.115.32 0 2.20 80 357.924 24 1.9 2.4Telangana0.03311.6 0 1.8 2 1 0.0148.99.773.7Null Null 0.001
Tripura0.537.60.4324.31 0 Null0 31 94.8NullNull 0.8 5.3Tripura0.0190.5 4.8 1 0 0 0.0021.2-5.598.55.9 Null 0.051
Uttar Pradesh3.230.10.522.51 0 1.4210.776 129.224 20.3 3.2 5.7Uttar Pradesh0.0214 1.3 2.6 1 1.50.02112.33.3 78.11.8 Null 0.035
Uttarakhand-3.520.40.2120.11 0 0.70 37 255.824 23.6 1.9 3.5Uttarakhand0.0366.8 0.2 1.5 0 2 0.0043.6-0.8152.72.6 0.000 0
West Bengal0.920.40.4216.43 0 Null18387.7293 129.724 23 0.5 6.3West Bengal0.0232 0.1 1.6 0 0.50.0176.530.487.41.5 0.0000.001
Designed b y
STATE
ROUND-I
ENERGY &
CLIMATE INDEX
STATE ENERGY & CLIMATE INDEX
ROUND-I